Originally Posted by Wolverine
Another Zimmer Apologist speaks.
Other people have brought out how ever since ZImmer has been DC we have spent all our high draft picks on Defense. Yet this guys never improves the pass rush or QB sacks or turnovers . You say how Parcells picked to keep Zimmer but you dont wanna deal with how it looks like Parcells has about had it with him.
The real prob is Zimmer sucks so bad he cant figure out how to do anything with the talent he has. And in 2003 our D was only #1 cuz of a weak schedule. What hapt to our great #1 D in our 1st play off game when he had to face a good offense. Oh thats right Zimmers #1 D got lit up. Just like it got lit up whenever we did have to face a offense that was good.
Hey HOLLYWOOD HENDERSON. Good stuff. To bad people in here dont listen more to you cuz you couldnt be more right!!!
It's strikes me as funny how...when someone is in support of an individual coach or player, they are immediately labeled by some as an "apologist." And furthermore, why does the "apologist" moniker always seem to have a negative connotation attached to it by those throwing the label around?
If some (all 2 or 3 of you) want to continue being "Zimmer antagonists", go right ahead. Wolverine's public endorsement of Hollywood and his stance on Zimmer probably has everyone jumping on the Anti-Zimmer bandwagon as we speak.