Originally Posted by jksmith269
I agree with you about the Rome part but Matt Mosley, and Micky Spags both have mentioned that Glover could be traded. I think last week spags talked about it on one of the Ranch Reports it was the day or two after the minicamp. So I tend to think its more than just possible that Glover is moved. Muller the new GM of the Dolphins said the reason he when he was with the saints traded Glover to us in the first place was he wasn't fitting into their 34 they were trying to implement. Now I like Glover he's a good player but I've said all offseason if we switch to the 34 I expect to see him traded and I still do if we are going to the 34 full time or even 1/2 the time. Does he deserve to not start? to only play part time? I don't think so. I'd rather see him start somewhere than sit on our bench that said I wouldn't mind his talent being there if Ferrgie got hurt. So like I said it would depend on what we could get for him.
uh, the Saints didnt trade Glover to us...they released him ina slaary cap move and we signed his as a free agent
we arnt trading Glover, nor will we be playing the 3-4 every single down...you'll see plenty of 4 man fronts, and Glover will be a part of a majority of those snaps