Originally Posted by JDSmith
Once again, I didn't bring Troy into the equation. Someone else did. It turns out that is a follish example because Troy actually plays much better against 10+ win teams than Bledsoe does.
Bledsoe's entire career can't equal Troy's 4 year run from 1992 to 1995.
So someone brought up Troy's record in bad team years. 4-6. I'll take that over 5 for a career any day of the week.
Why won't you?
anybody woudl take aikman over bledsoe, but you look at the teams, look at the player, Is bledsoe so bad because he has only 5 wins against 11+ teams, when his TEAM has only made it to the SB ONCE. Troy was on the best dynasty in the NFL, he should beat the 11+teams, but yet he only had a 41% winning, even great QB's fall,
take away 1996 and Troy was only 2-6. Was he bad or his team
1. Redskins - Check
2. Dolphins - Check
3. Arizona -