View Single Post
Old 07-06-2005   #9
Kangaroo
Senior Member
 
Kangaroo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi
And what would the total have been if we stayed in the 4-3? 7?

Everyone talks of Glover being on the downside of his career, but Ellis will be 30 years old by the time trainig camp breaks. He's just 1 year younger than Glover, and unlike Glover he's had a major injury in his career. Neither Ellis nor Glover have upside left. They have no ceiling yet to reach. They are what they are, and its nothing spectacular. To just stick in this 4-3 because it best suits Ellis and Glover reminds me of people who hold at Blackjack at 15. Yeah, you're not going to bust, but you're not likely to beat the house either. These are not players we should build a franchise on.


[View Full Quote]
No we should have cut ties with them or traded them period end of story. They are undersized making this defense a crappy defense when it goes 3-4. The line is not big enough to run a 3-4 at this time. This team will be killed by the run just like last year
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from his government."
Thomas Paine




Kangaroo is offline