Originally Posted by Cowboys&LakersFan
And again it's because he holds on to the ball far too and isn't very mobile. Bradford is like your classic pure pocket quarterback. Can't really get out of the pocket at all. Tony as we all know is the exact opposite. Incredibly mobile, can avoid the pressure and sacks that's why he doesn't get hit or sacked nearly as much as Bradford does.
..and this post means nothing in regards to how good or bad each team's OL is. Care to qualify your earlier statement on how the Rams OL is "far better" than the Cowboys when they have their guy pressured more, hit more, and sacked more?
Other than, "Tony is good at sensing pressure and avoiding sacks."
..because, while that's true, its not an argument that the Rams line is far better.