Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt
The proof has been overwhelming.
They do not strip him of all titles on a hunch.
He does not resign from his charity for no reason.
The guy cheated. He knows it, the cycling world knows it, his former team mates know it.
No need to continually act like it is not so when it is so.
Where is the proof of a dirty test?
He resigned from the Charity because the publicity was hurting the charity.
If he cheated, there should be a record of it. If he cheated, he would have been nailed to the wall for it. The Cycling world has been out to get him for 20 years.
No need to convict him with no proof either BP but you did.