Originally Posted by theogt
There isn't any argument. There is no logical argument that it wasn't a catch. No one has espoused any reasonable argument -- at all. The only argument is "it didn't touch the ground". Well...uhh....yeah, the pictures don't lie.
The only argument is just how clear it was that it wasn't a catch. Everyone agrees now it wasn't a catch.
Your picture doesn't show it touching the ground. It looks like it might be, but they need conclusive evidence to over turn the call on the field. The evidence is inconclusive.