Originally Posted by CATCH17
I was anti Spencer because I didn't feel like he deserved 10 mill a year. I still don't think he is a 10 mill a year player.
If we can ink him up for around 6.5 - 7.5 a year then I think that would be good.
He may not get ten, but it will be closer to 9, then 6.5
Just for reference, If he finishes with 10+ sacks, most would agree that he wasn't over paid this year ($8.9 Million), so for him to take a pay cut would be absurd.