Originally Posted by JoeyBoy718
xwalker, I'm just a little confused by "players with contracts that can be restructered." All but 3 of those players would have a positive impact if restructered, but 3 of those players (Ware, Carr and Austin) have a negative impact and thus make the restructuring of all those contracts barely useful. So why would you include Ware, Carr and Austin? Wouldn't it be in our best interest to restructure everyone besides them?
My guess is the hit woud be much worse if we did not restrcuture those contracts. I don't have the data in front of me to verify it though.