Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt
I find it amazing how many people just KNOW for a fact that it was Jason hire or Jerry's hire when the only fact is it is their opinions that it was Jason or Jerry's hire.
Some time down the road we will get the true story. Until that time all we have are opinions and it is magical how people are so sure their opinions are the right one in this matter and any one who does not agree is something similar to an ostrich with it's head in the sand or agenda driven.
I have yet to see any facts that convince me one way or the other of who's hire it was.
My GUESS and OPINION is that it could be a hire that BOTH agreed upon...and that could be good or bad for Jason depending on how it went down...IF it went down that way.
[View Full Quote]Again...time will tell and the truth will come out down the road. Until that time how about those that just KNOW that it was this guy's or that guy's hire talk about in as an opinion instead of acting like it is fact and everyone that does not agree with your Fact (opinion) is wrong.
Just something to consider.
I agree,i dont care who hired who,the only thing that matters is wins and losses and we wont know that for another 7 months, if we do good,its a JG hire,bad,JJ ****ed up again...rinse wash repeat.