Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboysBravesSpurs
I disagree. I dont know why so many people are worried about the dline. Its in much better shape than our safeties. Why draft a DT? Im sure Ratliff, lissemore, & Hatcher will be great at DT. I am worried about LE. I wouldn't be mad if we drafted someone who would be good to put on the opposite side of ware. But just take a look at out safeties. Church is coming off such a bad injury. He was already slow in the first place, lets not hope he lost a step when he comes back because I think he can be a great ss. Im just sick of seeing sensabum out there. Always getting beat. And people are putting hope in matt Johnson, but what has he done in the NFL? And plus the dude is injury prone. Not saying he cant be a great NFL player but I wanna see it before I hop on the bandwagon. [View Full Quote]So we got a bum in sensabaugh, church who really hasn't fully proven himself & coming off injury, and matt Johnson who is also coming off injury & we have no clue how great he's gonna be. I think we need atleast one good athletic free safety who can cover the field & excel in coverage.
I think it should be like this.. OL>S>DL |
Yeah if Spencer is brought back, a DL of Spencer, Ware, TRat, and Hatch is much better than anything we have at safety.....and its not close. A rookie DL would probably not even start, unless of course one of the old guys we have on the DL breaks down.
I really don't know how anyone would think Sensy (who is around Spencer and Hatch's age, 30, so he's also old) is as good of a football player as anyone of those starting 4 on our DL. Give me an old DL over an old DB any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Our DL needs youth, but our safety position needs talent....and that is the huge difference.