Originally Posted by Beast_from_East
Is an extension for Romo in the best interest of the team?
Well Aikman said we would win no more than 3 games without Romo, so I would think an extension would be in the best interest of the team. In fact, even the Romo haters admit that there is currently no QB we can get that would be better, their argument is that we should get rid of Romo so we can tank and get the first pick so we can then draft Johnny football.
So even the haters agree that we would suck without Romo, they just wouldnt mind it.
Aikman is correct about the 3 games. Heck with Romo we half won 8 games last season and the previous one. Romo is a goog QB.