
|
11-07-2006
|
#1
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
Current Draft Order
I am not figuring any tie breakers yet. I'm not slotting playoff seeds higher. Also not switching traded picks. Just slotting the teams on the winning % of their 2006 opponents.
1. Arizona Cardinals, 1-7, .531
2. Detroit Lions, 2-6, .508
T3. Houston Texans, 2-6, .516
T3. Cleveland Browns, 2-6, .516
T3. Miami Dolphins, 2-6, .516
T6. Oakland Raiders, 2-6, .523
T6. Pittsburgh Steelers, 2-6, .523
8. Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 2-6, .570
9. Tennessee Titans, 2-6, .578
10. Green Bay Packers, 3-5, .492
11. San Francisco 49ers, 3-5, .508
12. Buffalo Bills, 3-5, .539
13. Washington Redskins, 3-5, .547
T14. Minnesota Vikings, 4-4, .461
T14. New York Jets, 4-4, .461
16. St. Louis Rams, 4-4, .469
17. Dallas Cowboys, 4-4, .492
18. Carolina Panthers, 4-4, .508
19. Philadelphia Eagles, 4-4, .516
20. Cincinnati Bengals, 4-4, .547
21. Atlanta Falcons, 5-3, .453
22. Seattle Seahawks, 5-3, .461
23. Kansas City Chiefs, 5-3, .484
24. Jacksonville Jaguars, 5-3, .492
25. Baltimore Ravens, 6-2, .442
26. San Diego Chargers, 6-2, .453
27. New Orleans Saints, 6-2, .461
28. New England Patriots, 6-2, .500
29. Denver Broncos, 6-2, .523
30. New York Giants, 6-2, .531
31. Chicago Bears, 7-1, .422
32. Indianapolis Colts, 8-0, .469
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | In transition |
Posts: | 9,351 |
|
How did you devise those percentages out of equal records? Did you formulate a strength of schedule or something?
Conan O'Brien will work you until you are pale !
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#3
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | DC suburb |
Posts: | 27,870 |
|
Please, no more Ohio State linebackers.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#4
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aikbach
How did you devise those percentages out of equal records? Did you formulate a strength of schedule or something?
|
I made a program that has the entire season's schedule already entered. Then all I have to do is add a win when a team wins and a loss when they lose and it automatically calculates the %s.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2004 |
Posts: | 2,185 |
|
if we do end up picking in the middle somewhere, my pre-combine wishlist would include either Levi Brown or Jake Long, both offensive linemen.
If not, OL, then I would hope Dwayne Jarrett would fall to us. He's probably not going to come close to his last year numbers, so I'm hoping he slides a little, but his stock could also skyrocket if he runs a good 40.
Number 3 on the wishlist would be a stud CB.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#6
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hailmary
if we do end up picking in the middle somewhere, my pre-combine wishlist would include either Levi Brown or Jake Long, both offensive linemen.
If not, OL, then I would hope Dwayne Jarrett would fall to us. He's probably not going to come close to his last year numbers, so I'm hoping he slides a little, but his stock could also skyrocket if he runs a good 40.
Number 3 on the wishlist would be a stud CB.
|
FS, Laron Landry, of LSU is still on top of my wish list. I like Pat Watkins, Landry is a difference maker.
If a QB is there I think we have to consider it. OL is definitely a top need.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#7
|
|
Mr. Wright
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Galloway, New Je |
Posts: | 7,161 |
|
I covered Dwayne Jarret in HS. He was just a frosh though so he wasnt "too" dangerous.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2006 |
Location: | New York |
Posts: | 24,117 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I am not figuring any tie breakers yet. I'm not slotting playoff seeds higher. Also not switching traded picks. Just slotting the teams on the winning % of their 2006 opponents.
1. Arizona Cardinals, 1-7, .531
2. Detroit Lions, 2-6, .508
T3. Houston Texans, 2-6, .516
T3. Cleveland Browns, 2-6, .516
T3. Miami Dolphins, 2-6, .516
T6. Oakland Raiders, 2-6, .523
T6. Pittsburgh Steelers, 2-6, .523
8. Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 2-6, .570
9. Tennessee Titans, 2-6, .578
10. Green Bay Packers, 3-5, .492
11. San Francisco 49ers, 3-5, .508
12. Buffalo Bills, 3-5, .539
13. Washington Redskins, 3-5, .547
T14. Minnesota Vikings, 4-4, .461
T14. New York Jets, 4-4, .461
16. St. Louis Rams, 4-4, .469
17. Dallas Cowboys, 4-4, .492
18. Carolina Panthers, 4-4, .508
19. Philadelphia Eagles, 4-4, .516 [View Full Quote]20. Cincinnati Bengals, 4-4, .547
21. Atlanta Falcons, 5-3, .453
22. Seattle Seahawks, 5-3, .461
23. Kansas City Chiefs, 5-3, .484
24. Jacksonville Jaguars, 5-3, .492
25. Baltimore Ravens, 6-2, .442
26. San Diego Chargers, 6-2, .453
27. New Orleans Saints, 6-2, .461
28. New England Patriots, 6-2, .500
29. Denver Broncos, 6-2, .523
30. New York Giants, 6-2, .531
31. Chicago Bears, 7-1, .422
32. Indianapolis Colts, 8-0, .469
|
so who would you wanna draft? i think we will keep romo.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#9
|
|
Mr. Wright
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Galloway, New Je |
Posts: | 7,161 |
|
I have some favoritism w. Michigan but Long is a great OT which could be a very viable option and if we want CB early Hall has been a stand out this year (not sure if it would be a stretch though).
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#10
|
|
Mr. Wright
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Galloway, New Je |
Posts: | 7,161 |
|
I still wanna give Watkins a better shot and some time to develope personally.. so I would stay away from FS.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Valencia, CA |
Posts: | 2,113 |
|
i like that safety from florida he is pretty good also..and that wr they have bubba caldwell or something i think his name is
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#12
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
21. Atlanta Falcons, 5-3, .453
22. Seattle Seahawks, 5-3, .461
23. Kansas City Chiefs, 5-3, .484
24. Jacksonville Jaguars, 5-3, .492
25. Baltimore Ravens, 6-2, .442
26. San Diego Chargers, 6-2, .453
27. New Orleans Saints, 6-2, .461
28. New England Patriots, 6-2, .500
29. Denver Broncos, 6-2, .523
30. New York Giants, 6-2, .531
31. Chicago Bears, 7-1, .422
32. Indianapolis Colts, 8-0, .469
|
I was looking at these teams and thinking. That's almost the 12 playoff teams as it stands right now. All 8 division leaders are there. The problem is there are 7 AFC teams and 5 NFC teams.
If you went strictly by the draft order (Yes, I know they won't end up this way) KC would be out and Philly in.
I do think it's safe to say that 7 of the 8 division leaders at the halfway point all have their divisions in jeopardy. The Broncos and Chargers are in a dogfight for the AFC West. The rest not so much.
We figured the NFC East was the best division in football prior to the season. I think the AFC West might argue that.
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Schertz, TX |
Posts: | 32,067 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgun
Please, no more Ohio State linebackers.
|

Mr. Jones and CrazyCowboy--Training Camp 2004
|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#14
|
|
Mr. Buckeye
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Buckeye Nation |
Posts: | 12,746 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgun
Please, no more Ohio State linebackers.
|
bbgun...

|
|
|
11-07-2006
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | May 2005 |
Location: | WHITE SANDS NM |
Posts: | 38,205 |
|
I think that after looking at last night and knowing how messed up the Cards are that the Raiders and Cards will be one and two in some order.Houston 3; browns 4. Detroit seems to be getting its O together so I put them at 5.
After that who knows. with 8 games to go its going to get jumbled all over. I wonder what the draft order looked like this time last year, and then compare it with the actual 2006 draft.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.
|