Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-13-2006   #16
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,829
Default

Its funny to see how both the Cardinals and Bucs both have top 5 picks when they were both common picks to go to the playoffs. And then the Dolphins, Steelers, and Redskins in the top 10 as well when a lot of people thought that they coudl be super bowl contenders. A lot of teams were overrated this offseason.
Future is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #17
CrazyCowboy
Senior Member
 
CrazyCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Schertz, TX
Posts:
32,066
Default

We are headed to 32 folks.....


Mr. Jones and CrazyCowboy--Training Camp 2004
CrazyCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #18
baj1dallas
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,556
Default

the Lions are so inept that they can't even get the first pick in the draft.
baj1dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #19
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baj1dallas View Post
the Lions are so inept that they can't even get the first pick in the draft.
The Cardinals are inepter (is that a word?).
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #20
Funxva
Inventor of the Whizzinator
 
Funxva's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Location:
Alexandria, VA
Posts:
1,624
Default

So Deadskins would drop to the 30th pick right now, and the Broncos would get the 10th?

Is that right?
Let's Go Boys!

We are building something of worth!

Funxva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #21
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funxva View Post
So Deadskins would drop to the 30th pick right now, and the Broncos would get the 10th?

Is that right?
NO, the terms of their trade mean that the pick swap would have to equate a high third round value.



The most interesting thing on the entire chart is the Bears' opponents' winning percentage... .417. By far the easiest schedule in the league.
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #22
kmd24
Senior Member
 
kmd24's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funxva View Post
So Deadskins would drop to the 30th pick right now, and the Broncos would get the 10th?

Is that right?
No, the Skins pick is too high for the 1st round swap. The Broncos would likely get the 2007 3rd and possibly the 2008 4th.

The Skins would have to end up with a pick around 20 for the swap to happen if Denver finished with the 30th pick (i.e., lost the AFC title game). If Denver loses in the first round of the playoffs, the Skins would have to pick around 13-14 for the 1st round swap to happen.

In short, the first round swap is unlikely to happen. If Washington tanks the rest of the season, Denver will probably just end up with the 3rd rounder.
kmd24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #23
REDVOLUTION
Return to Dominance
 
REDVOLUTION's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Formerly YoMick
Posts:
21,416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski View Post
NO, the terms of their trade mean that the pick swap would have to equate a high third round value.



The most interesting thing on the entire chart is the Bears' opponents' winning percentage... .417. By far the easiest schedule in the league.
Take away the Giants wins against us and the Eagles and its even lower
REDVOLUTION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #24
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski View Post
NO, the terms of their trade mean that the pick swap would have to equate a high third round value.



The most interesting thing on the entire chart is the Bears' opponents' winning percentage... .417. By far the easiest schedule in the league.
At one point I nearly added a blurb about that. The Titans have the roughest schedule.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #25
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
At one point I nearly added a blurb about that. The Titans have the roughest schedule.


It's still early in the year though. Playing the one win Cardinals dropped the Cowboys dramatically the same way that playing the unbeaten Colts will raise it quickly.
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #26
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski View Post
It's still early in the year though. Playing the one win Cardinals dropped the Cowboys dramatically the same way that playing the unbeaten Colts will raise it quickly.
Actually, after a PM conversation with AdamJT13, I detemined that he was correct, and I calculate this based on the entire season's roster. So Indianapolis, Philly, Gayants, Falcons, Saints, Buccaneers, & Lions are already figured into the current winning % for the Cowboys and the same for every other team. It gives a truer sense of how it will break down over the course of the season.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #27
kTXe
On To The Next One
 
kTXe's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Location:
Chapel Hill, NC
Posts:
1,472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrumann59 View Post
Gladly but I just never expected a newbie thread by an ADMIN.
WTH? I find this information interesting, as do all the others that opened up this thread. Perhaps you should remove your banhammer from your pooper.
kTXe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #28
skinsngibbs4life
Senior Member
 
skinsngibbs4life's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
1,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
The Cardinals are inepter (is that a word?).
jeez, we might see an o-lineman go with the #1 overall pick...
skinsngibbs4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #29
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsngibbs4life View Post
jeez, we might see an o-lineman go with the #1 overall pick...
Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconosin.

Though I think they will dangle the overall #1 and Brady Quinn to several teams.

I can name 2 OTs that have gone overall #1. Ron Yary & Orlando Pace. I can't say Thomas is in that zone.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #30
skinsngibbs4life
Senior Member
 
skinsngibbs4life's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
1,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconosin.

Though I think they will dangle the overall #1 and Brady Quinn to several teams.

I can name 2 OTs that have gone overall #1. Ron Yary & Orlando Pace. I can't say Thomas is in that zone.
they would be stupid to not try and trade down, but it is always tough to trade out of that spot
skinsngibbs4life is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com