
|
11-13-2006
|
#16
|
|
Intramural Legend
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Canandaigua, NY |
Posts: | 12,829 |
|
Its funny to see how both the Cardinals and Bucs both have top 5 picks when they were both common picks to go to the playoffs. And then the Dolphins, Steelers, and Redskins in the top 10 as well when a lot of people thought that they coudl be super bowl contenders. A lot of teams were overrated this offseason.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Schertz, TX |
Posts: | 32,066 |
|
We are headed to 32 folks.....
Mr. Jones and CrazyCowboy--Training Camp 2004
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 6,556 |
|
the Lions are so inept that they can't even get the first pick in the draft.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#19
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baj1dallas
the Lions are so inept that they can't even get the first pick in the draft.
|
The Cardinals are inepter (is that a word?).
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#20
|
|
Inventor of the Whizzinator
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Location: | Alexandria, VA |
Posts: | 1,624 |
|
So Deadskins would drop to the 30th pick right now, and the Broncos would get the 10th?
Is that right?
Let's Go Boys!
We are building something of worth!
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 4,812 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funxva
So Deadskins would drop to the 30th pick right now, and the Broncos would get the 10th?
Is that right?
|
NO, the terms of their trade mean that the pick swap would have to equate a high third round value.
The most interesting thing on the entire chart is the Bears' opponents' winning percentage... .417. By far the easiest schedule in the league.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 3,436 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funxva
So Deadskins would drop to the 30th pick right now, and the Broncos would get the 10th?
Is that right?
|
No, the Skins pick is too high for the 1st round swap. The Broncos would likely get the 2007 3rd and possibly the 2008 4th.
The Skins would have to end up with a pick around 20 for the swap to happen if Denver finished with the 30th pick (i.e., lost the AFC title game). If Denver loses in the first round of the playoffs, the Skins would have to pick around 13-14 for the 1st round swap to happen.
In short, the first round swap is unlikely to happen. If Washington tanks the rest of the season, Denver will probably just end up with the 3rd rounder.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#23
|
|
Return to Dominance
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Formerly YoMick |
Posts: | 21,416 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski
NO, the terms of their trade mean that the pick swap would have to equate a high third round value.
The most interesting thing on the entire chart is the Bears' opponents' winning percentage... .417. By far the easiest schedule in the league.
|
Take away the Giants wins against us and the Eagles and its even lower 
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#24
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski
NO, the terms of their trade mean that the pick swap would have to equate a high third round value.
The most interesting thing on the entire chart is the Bears' opponents' winning percentage... .417. By far the easiest schedule in the league.
|
At one point I nearly added a blurb about that. The Titans have the roughest schedule.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 4,812 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
At one point I nearly added a blurb about that. The Titans have the roughest schedule.
|
It's still early in the year though. Playing the one win Cardinals dropped the Cowboys dramatically the same way that playing the unbeaten Colts will raise it quickly.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#26
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski
It's still early in the year though. Playing the one win Cardinals dropped the Cowboys dramatically the same way that playing the unbeaten Colts will raise it quickly.
|
Actually, after a PM conversation with AdamJT13, I detemined that he was correct, and I calculate this based on the entire season's roster. So Indianapolis, Philly, Gayants, Falcons, Saints, Buccaneers, & Lions are already figured into the current winning % for the Cowboys and the same for every other team. It gives a truer sense of how it will break down over the course of the season.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#27
|
|
On To The Next One
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Location: | Chapel Hill, NC |
Posts: | 1,472 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrumann59
Gladly but I just never expected a newbie thread by an ADMIN.
|
WTH? I find this information interesting, as do all the others that opened up this thread. Perhaps you should remove your banhammer from your pooper.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 1,382 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
The Cardinals are inepter (is that a word?).
|
jeez, we might see an o-lineman go with the #1 overall pick...
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#29
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsngibbs4life
jeez, we might see an o-lineman go with the #1 overall pick...
|
Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconosin.
Though I think they will dangle the overall #1 and Brady Quinn to several teams.
I can name 2 OTs that have gone overall #1. Ron Yary & Orlando Pace. I can't say Thomas is in that zone.
|
|
|
11-14-2006
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 1,382 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconosin.
Though I think they will dangle the overall #1 and Brady Quinn to several teams.
I can name 2 OTs that have gone overall #1. Ron Yary & Orlando Pace. I can't say Thomas is in that zone.
|
they would be stupid to not try and trade down, but it is always tough to trade out of that spot
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.
|