
|
01-01-2007
|
#31
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2005 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 485 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967
hey thats great
he'd be lucky to have half of that here in this scheme
by the way, when Merriman missed those 4 games, did San Diego suffer any? nope...they won all 4 games and still had 14 or 15 sacks without him
David
|
you can argue ifs and buts all day long, the fact is Merriman has been a lot more consistent and a much better playmaker than Ware........those are the cold hard facts, but keep giving excuses if it makes you feel better about the pick.
Ware is a very good player, but thus far he has not been as good as Merriman, that is a simple fact.
Playmaker!
2007 HOF Class
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#32
|
|
iPhotoshop
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 5,684 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy493
you can argue ifs and buts all day long, the fact is Merriman has been a lot more consistent and a much better playmaker than Ware........those are the cold hard facts, but keep giving excuses if it makes you feel better about the pick.
Ware is a very good player, but thus far he has not been as good as Merriman, that is a simple fact.
|
u sound like bipo and his leftwich fetish 
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#33
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
Think draft depends on whether BP stays, whether we keep with the 3-4, TO stays or goes, and FA of course.
Let's assume that we DO stick with the 3-4 and that BP stays and that TO stays.
I don't think we take OL in Round 1.
In FA, I think we get
1 OL (Rivera gone)
1 OLB (Singleton gone)
quite possibly a FS.
In the draft,
We take either one more pressure type defensive player in the 1st.
In the 2nd and 3rd rounds we probably take 1 OL and either a CB or a WR to groom.
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#34
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Euless, TX |
Posts: | 6,566 |
|
Please, no TE's.
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#35
|
|
Penguinite
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 16,295 |
|
We will not go Cb in round 1. We have Cbs. We do not have safeties, nose tackles, pass rushing DE/OLBs, offensive guards.
We should consider who will be gone.
Its funny but Madden 07 is the best way to handle it.
See whose contract is up and who is back and each position.
We will sign/draft an interior lineman or draft one. I believe we cut Rivera, he has not regained all his strength after the back injury.
We will sign/draft a defensive tackle.
Greg Ellis' status will tell us whether we are looking at first round DE/OLBs or not.
TO's status will determine our WR interest. If he is cut we need another starter not a mediocre guy or pedestrian draft pick.
There are just so many possibilities and concerns it would be crazy to think we'd even be close this early.
All that said you aren't a draftnik if you are completely sane....
I really like LaMarr Woodley and Gaines Adams at OLB/DE.
I really like Laron Landry at safety even though it was probably a bit of down year by his own standards.
I really like Justin Blaylock on the interior line. He's a local kid.
I would almost insanely draft Justin Blaylock in round 1. I am against interior line in round 1 but we have been putrid there for too many years and the free agent route has been less than stellar.
Have to assume we fix the defense with free agency and address WR/DE/OLB based on signing replacements if the concerned parties are waived.
But I still don't know what any team saw Thursday night that would have made them comfortable with waiting a round or two for the offensive lineman they wanted. ---Todd McShay
We just converted half our LB to DL. We have a 30m starting DL, it better be pretty friggin good.
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#36
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 777 |
|
I know he's not available but Nick Collins of the Packers is a stud Safety. Perhaps a trade: J Jones for Collins. I'll take it right now.
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#37
|
|
iPhotoshop
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 5,684 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woods
Think draft depends on whether BP stays, whether we keep with the 3-4, TO stays or goes, and FA of course.
Let's assume that we DO stick with the 3-4 and that BP stays and that TO stays.
I don't think we take OL in Round 1.
In FA, I think we get
1 OL (Rivera gone)
1 OLB (Singleton gone)
quite possibly a FS.
In the draft,
We take either one more pressure type defensive player in the 1st.
In the 2nd and 3rd rounds we probably take 1 OL and either a CB or a WR to groom.
|
if dallas took another rookie fs i would gladly pay to have him shot
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#38
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2005 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 485 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinMind
u sound like bipo and his leftwich fetish 
|
Difference is, BiPo is a Marshall homer as you are a Fresno homer, Lefty sucks, Merriman does not, Merriman is a dominant force.
Besides I didn't want Lefty or Newman that draft, I wanted Suggs.
Playmaker!
2007 HOF Class
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#39
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy493
you can argue ifs and buts all day long, the fact is Merriman has been a lot more consistent and a much better playmaker than Ware........those are the cold hard facts, but keep giving excuses if it makes you feel better about the pick.
Ware is a very good player, but thus far he has not been as good as Merriman, that is a simple fact.
|
blah blah blah
put Ware in San Diego's defense and Merriman here, and we'd be having the xact same discussion "why did we draft Merriman when Ware is so much more athletic and productive"
same thing with the Steven Jackson non-sense
it just amazes me that some people continuously believe that no matter what a plyer does someplace else in a totally different scheme, atmosphere or with totally different players, that he'd be exactly the same or better here
David
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#40
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2005 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 485 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967
blah blah blah
put Ware in San Diego's defense and Merriman here, and we'd be having the xact same discussion "why did we draft Merriman when Ware is so much more athletic and productive"
same thing with the Steven Jackson non-sense
it just amazes me that some people continuously believe that no matter what a plyer does someplace else in a totally different scheme, atmosphere or with totally different players, that he'd be exactly the same or better here
David
|
Actually I hear nothing but blah, blah, blah homerism from you........I have presented facts, you have presented nothing but what ifs.
Playmaker!
2007 HOF Class
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#41
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Dec 2006 |
Location: | West Palm Beach, |
Posts: | 6,031 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy493
you can argue ifs and buts all day long, the fact is Merriman has been a lot more consistent and a much better playmaker than Ware........those are the cold hard facts, but keep giving excuses if it makes you feel better about the pick.
Ware is a very good player, but thus far he has not been as good as Merriman, that is a simple fact.
|
I'm happy to see I'm not alone in that debate.
I agree with you.
Oh as for the draft,stay away from LSU players.
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#42
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy493
Actually I hear nothing but blah, blah, blah homerism from you........I have presented facts, you have presented nothing but what ifs.
|
Wade Phillips >>>> Mike Zimmer
what facts have you presented exactly? that Merriman has more sacks? so what...look at how he's used...look at how many plays he does nothing other than rush the QB...Ware doesnt rush the passer every play...look at the blitz designs San Diego uses, I can probably count on one hand how many times we've seen a Cowboy player unblocked to the QB ALL SEASON, however you watch a San Diego game and it happens multiple times per game
they lost their best pass rusher before the season ever started, and they still rolled up a huge number of sacks without him (Foley)...they replaced him with a middle rd pick backup, and the guy produced double digit sacks himself
David
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#43
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2005 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 485 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967
Wade Phillips >>>> Mike Zimmer
what facts have you presented exactly? that Merriman has more sacks? so what...
|
yeah sacks and production and taking over games defensively on a consistent basis are way overrated, lol
Nice comeback.
The only thing you said in that post that I agree with is Wade Phillips is > than Zimmer, but thanks for pointing out the obvious there.
Playmaker!
2007 HOF Class
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#44
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | May 2005 |
Location: | WHITE SANDS NM |
Posts: | 38,190 |
|
It all comes down to what we do with the coaches and then in FA. No way you can tell who we might want in the draft at this time.
|
|
|
01-01-2007
|
#45
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | May 2005 |
Location: | WHITE SANDS NM |
Posts: | 38,190 |
|
Taking over a game- DWare has done that a couple of times. Merriman- that I question. SOme here seem to forget that a LB has to do more then rush the passer. DWares stats in everything except sacks are better then Merrimans. And can anyone seriously say that Dware is in as good a system, with as good support as Merriman?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.
|