
|
03-16-2007
|
#31
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Schertz, TX |
Posts: | 32,067 |
|
This would be a great pickup.
Mr. Jones and CrazyCowboy--Training Camp 2004
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#32
|
|
Hardwork and Dedication
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2012
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Location: | Dunder Mifflin |
Posts: | 3,983 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by abersonc
I promise to wet myself if that happens on draft day
|
you and me both  but someone drops every year so we shall see...lol..
I may live in DC but my heart is with the COWBOYS!!!!!..A Storm is coming!!
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#33
|
|
The Boognish
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Location: | Nowhereland |
Posts: | 13,853 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano
Torry Holt, #1 receiver, says hello back
but my God, St. Louis passing on the defender of Landry's ilk is what I want people to talk about
|
Oh that makes a lot of sense.
He s their number 1 receiver no doubt but the fact that they signed Bennett should indicate to anyone with a modicum of sense that they are going towards a more balanced passing attack. Thus s possesion receiver in the draft makes sense but as per usual any indication that we might have the oppurtunity to draft a RB or S on day 1 just means summer sticks his head farther and farther into the sand.
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins
Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#34
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Posts: | 175 |
|
HaH...Lions select another WR, well this is a very credible mock draft now.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#35
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Sep 2004 |
Location: | I'm on a boat |
Posts: | 24,279 |
|
I'd nut myself if we got Landry
Or conversely, I'd drive up to Valley Ranch and show Jerruh's insides what a size 12 steel-toed boot looks like if he fell to us and we didnt pick him
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#36
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
Oh that makes a lot of sense.
He s their number 1 receiver no doubt but the fact that they signed Bennett should indicate to anyone with a modicum of sense that they are going towards a more balanced passing attack. Thus s possesion receiver in the draft makes sense but as per usual any indication that we might have the oppurtunity to draft a RB or S on day 1 just means summer sticks his head farther and farther into the sand.
|
I don't know what this has to do w/ me not wanting a S and RB on the 1st day, many people believe Landry is a top 10 pick, I just don't see St. Louis sacrificing the chance to draft an impact player for their D, for a possession receiver
Last edited by Bob Sacamano : 03-16-2007 at 05:54 PM.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#37
|
|
The Dog that Saved Charleston
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Herriman, UT |
Posts: | 7,159 |
|
Not gunna' happen.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#38
|
|
The Boognish
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Location: | Nowhereland |
Posts: | 13,853 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano
I don't know what this has to do w/ me not wanting a S and RB on the 1st day, many people believe Landry is a top 10 pick, I just don't see St. Louis sacrificing the chance to draft an impact player for their D, for a possession receiver
|
Sometimes i wonder if you are truly feigning density or if it is real.
In any situation where a safety or RB prospect is proposed to fall to us you do your best to shoot it down. Its a trend.
You dont even use correct logic. What would have made sense is that with Holt, Bruce and Bennet under contract they dont need another receiver.
Regardless I still would see you being mad if Landry did fall to us and we picked him up.
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins
Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#39
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
Sometimes i wonder if you are truly feigning density or if it is real.
In any situation where a safety or RB prospect is proposed to fall to us you do your best to shoot it down. Its a trend.
You dont even use correct logic. What would have made sense is that with Holt, Bruce and Bennet under contract they dont need another receiver.
Regardless I still would see you being mad if Landry did fall to us and we picked him up.
|
I wouldn't be mad at all if a top 10 pick fell to us at 22, not at all, I just don't see Landry dropping all the way to 22 when Donte Whitner, a lesser prospect, went #8 or #9 overall last year, Landry can do so much, he can patrol CF, and he can cover the slot receiver, a perfect pick for St. Louis
but can I have a preference for who I want to take in the 1st? please, can I? good Gawd
btw, I don't think Landry gets past San Fran or Atlanta
Last edited by Bob Sacamano : 03-16-2007 at 06:32 PM.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#40
|
|
THE BIG DOG
Years Donated 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Ahhhhh Kansas |
Posts: | 42,815 |
|
Think Clark Judge is drawing names out of a hat and calling it his mock?
This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#41
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2005 |
Location: | South O |
Posts: | 26,136 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I promise to wet you too.
|
This thread is gross.
victory is ours
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#42
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kansas City |
Posts: | 1,813 |
|
I also don't think Landry will still be on the board by the time we pick, and it wouldn't surprise me at all if Jones wants to trade down (that is, "if" he can find a team to trade with) in order to pick up additional picks.
|
|
|
03-16-2007
|
#43
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,898 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by superpunk
This thread is gross.
|
 That was the first person to come to my mind also.
But since there was no teenage girls are around, I figure R wouldn't be interested.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.
|