Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2007   #1
Silverstar
Senior Member
 
Silverstar's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin
Posts:
3,911
Default Grading the DE/OLB tweeners... I'm bored

I was looking at all the DE/OLB tweeners, that the Cowboys might consider as Ellis' eventual replacement. I decided to go with a simple premise, that if Ware is our WSLB at 6-4 257lbs, then our SSLB should be at least heavier than that right?

Right or wrong, that's how I feel about it and that's who I decided to look for in this draft. So, I started looking for tweeners at least 6020 inches tall and weighing 260 to 275lbs at the most. Then, I wanted a prospect that could run at least a 4.75 forty, a 1.60 or better 10 yard dash, a 3 cone drill of 7.20 or better and at least 25 reps. To me, that's adequate speed/strength to cause pressure from the LOS, cover a TE downfield or change directions in space by a SSLB in a 3-4.

Using these measurables and their best numbers at either the combine or campus workouts, I came up with only 4 prospects!

Winners

Anthony Spencer - 6027, 261, 4.69, 1.56, 7.14, 30 Reps
Brian Robison - 6031, 260, 4.67, 1.49, 6.89, 27 reps
Jay Moore - 6046, 274, 4.74, 1.59, 7.19, 26 reps
CJ Ah You - 6036, 274, 4.70, 1.53, 7.06, 26 reps


Losers

Gaines Adams - 6046, 260, 4.64, 1.58, 7.17, 21 reps
Jarvis Moss - 6064, 258 (soaking wet) 4.70, 1.52, 7.21, 16 reps
LaMarr Woodley - 6014, 266, 4.74, 1.65, N/A , 29 reps
Quentin Moses - 6052, 261, 4.75, 1.59, 7.38, 17 reps
Charles Johnson - 6022, 275, 4.75, 1.58, 7.50, 33 reps
Ray McDonald - 6033, 276, 4.88, 1.62, 7.41, never lifted
Victor Abiamiri - 6042, 267, 4.80, 1.56, N/A, 25 reps
Tim Crowder - 6035, 272, 4.69, 1.59, 7.28, 32 reps
Baraka Atkins - 6044, 271, 4.69, 1.56, 7.02, 22 reps
Dan Bazuin - 6027, 266, 4.77, 1.59, 7.09, 25 reps


Very picky I know, but I did give them two chances (combine/campus) to get into my range. Not an exact science for sure, but it did separate the better prospects and shine some light on others. Of course, Adams and Atkins can definitely get stronger, but the others were simply lacking in one form or another. If we could get Jay Moore or Baraka Atkins in say the 4th or 5th round, that would be a steal IMO.


Ok, my work is finished.
Tradition, Loyalty, Courage, Pride - COWBOYS
Silverstar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-27-2007   #2
tomson75
Brain Dead Shill
 
tomson75's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Virginia
Posts:
16,714
Default

Give me Robison in the fourth!
.


"What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
tomson75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #3
CowboyFan74
NFC Beast Champs
 
CowboyFan74's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Bedford, TX
Posts:
11,209
Send a message via AIM to CowboyFan74 Send a message via MSN to CowboyFan74 Send a message via Yahoo to CowboyFan74
Question

What did you mean by soaking wet next to Jarvis Moss?
CowboyFan74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #4
ENGCowboy
Senior Member
 
ENGCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2007
Location:
Manchester, Engl
Posts:
368
Default

Nice good work you must be bored.

I like the reasoning on what we need and Atkins/Rbinson sounds like a great pick, with a year to learn the defense

But only if WP is definately moving Carp inside.
ENGCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #5
Clove
Shrinkage
 
Clove's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
34,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverstar View Post
I was looking at all the DE/OLB tweeners, that the Cowboys might consider as Ellis' eventual replacement. I decided to go with a simple premise, that if Ware is our WSLB at 6-4 257lbs, then our SSLB should be at least heavier than that right?

Right or wrong, that's how I feel about it and that's who I decided to look for in this draft. So, I started looking for tweeners at least 6020 inches tall and weighing 260 to 275lbs at the most. Then, I wanted a prospect that could run at least a 4.75 forty, a 1.60 or better 10 yard dash, a 3 cone drill of 7.20 or better and at least 25 reps. To me, that's adequate speed/strength to cause pressure from the LOS, cover a TE downfield or change directions in space by a SSLB in a 3-4.

Using these measurables and their best numbers at either the combine or campus workouts, I came up with only 4 prospects!

Winners

Anthony Spencer - 6027, 261, 4.69, 1.56, 7.14, 30 Reps
[View Full Quote]
Good work.
The only thing I will say about this logic is playmaking ability exemption. If the guy misses out on a couple of measurables, but he is a flat out play-maker, he makes my list based on just getting the job done. (period )


Last edited by Clove : 03-27-2007 at 09:20 AM.
Clove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #6
AbeBeta
Senior Member
 
AbeBeta's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
23,316
Default

Measurables? How about performance playing a role?
AbeBeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #7
Silverstar
Senior Member
 
Silverstar's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin
Posts:
3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abersonc View Post
Measurables? How about performance playing a role?

Do you mean overall production...like stats?

Hard to come up with a standard for individual production.
Tradition, Loyalty, Courage, Pride - COWBOYS
Silverstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #8
AbeBeta
Senior Member
 
AbeBeta's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
23,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverstar View Post
Do you mean overall production...like stats?

Hard to come up with a standard for individual production.
you mean like how a guy actually performs in football games rather than in the underwear Olympics?
AbeBeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #9
dargonking999
DKRandom
 
dargonking999's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2010
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Location:
http://www.thepo
Posts:
11,519
Send a message via AIM to dargonking999 Send a message via MSN to dargonking999 Send a message via Yahoo to dargonking999
Default

IMO, you cna jude a players performance in College, to what he will do in the NFL. There are just way to man varaibles that affect it. I like silverstars anaylsis, as it focuses, on there size, speed, and strengh, the only things that wont decline from College ==> NFL
#Bootz2A..

Football Style

1. Redskins - Check

2. Dolphins - Check

3. Arizona -
dargonking999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #10
ThreeSportStar80
Banned
 
ThreeSportStar80's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Location:
Mid Atlantic
Posts:
27,093
Default

I'm bored just by reading your reasons for the rankings...*yawns*
ThreeSportStar80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #11
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,417
Default

These workouts give team a bit more info for the draft but in the end you can't erase 3 or 4 years of play on 1 day of workouts. There are some players on the Losers list who are very good players who I think have a chance to have very good careers and while the workout session may hurt them a bit in the draft it really has little to do with playing the games.
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #12
Silverstar
Senior Member
 
Silverstar's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin
Posts:
3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELDudearino View Post
What did you mean by soaking wet next to Jarvis Moss?
Jarvis weighed 250 at the combine and then added 8 pounds for his Pro Day. So, he's not a natural 260lb player (yet) and that's why I didn't give him the extra 2lbs to fit in my range. I gave it to Adams and Robison though, who weighed in at 258 and 259 at the combine....but didn't like doing it.
Tradition, Loyalty, Courage, Pride - COWBOYS
Silverstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #13
Silverstar
Senior Member
 
Silverstar's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin
Posts:
3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abersonc View Post
you mean like how a guy actually performs in football games rather than in the underwear Olympics?
Funny how those underwear Olympics, seem awfully important to NFL Owners, GM's, HC's and scouts.

You didn't answer my question...so here's more.


How do you grade performance in games?

What do you measure it by....tackles, sacks, tfl's, ff, fr, pbu's?

What is the lowest standard your willing to accept from a SSLB?
Tradition, Loyalty, Courage, Pride - COWBOYS
Silverstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #14
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverstar View Post
Funny how those underwear Olympics, seem awfully important to NFL Owners, GM's, HC's and scouts.

You didn't answer my question...so here's more.


How do you grade performance in games?

What do you measure it by....tackles, sacks, tfl's, ff, fr, pbu's?

What is the lowest standard your willing to accept from a pass rusher?
I would say scouts look at how quick a guy is off the ball, how quickly he reads and reacts during a play. There are a lot of intangibles that you can look at without resorting to just stats. I have heard more and more scouts say they get more out of the personal interviews with players than things like the 3 cone shuttle or even the 40. These workouts are drafting tools but do not replace the work a player has done on the field.
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007   #15
Silverstar
Senior Member
 
Silverstar's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin
Posts:
3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101 View Post
These workouts give team a bit more info for the draft but in the end you can't erase 3 or 4 years of play on 1 day of workouts. There are some players on the Losers list who are very good players who I think have a chance to have very good careers and while the workout session may hurt them a bit in the draft it really has little to do with playing the games.
Agreed, but you can erase a lot with a major injury or even a history of nagging injuries. Teams aren't going to be impressed by any player, who can't stay on the field and take the pounding that comes with the job.

Workouts are very important when grading a player and rightfully so.
Tradition, Loyalty, Courage, Pride - COWBOYS
Silverstar is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com