Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-05-2012   #76
cbow44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
Next year as another year of the Romo window closes, who is the surest thing to make an impact? Brockers, Perry or DeCastro? Obviously it is DeCastro he has started and played at a high level on one of the best programs in the country for the last 3 years. The other two not nearly as much. BTW sign Mario Williams who also is sure thing to make an impact it solves the other problem. Further more Bunting has DeCastro listed as 6th best prospect in the draft. Way too many people here are all wrapped up in what Free is getting paid. Put your best 5 people out there and make it work.
So LSU and USC are not high level programs ? Your right Brockers and Perry are underclassmen so they havent played at a high level for as long. And you get me Mario Williams I'll be turning cartwheels.
cbow44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #77
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbow44 View Post
I see you worked really hard on this and I'm not knocking DeCastro I think he is a really good player. But I quit looking after 6 links, all you showed were a bunch of fourms like this one. I have just about every draft site in my favorite places and I look at them all most every night. All agree he is a high pick. I'm saying their are other players we need to consider. Every year after the combine and senior bowl and all of the amatuer draft guys get to mingle with the the real scouts and you see a shuffling of their boards. At this time last year you didnt really hear anything about Aldon Smith or J.J. Watt as being top 10 picks. The same will hold true this year. After the Combine DeCastro may be considered a top 10 talent but so may Brockers or Perry. If the talent is equal I want someone who can help Ware put pressure on the QB. You guys would rather have Romo better protected. that dosent mean we dont care about Romo's health. It simply means I'm tired of some of this teams [View Full Quote]
So really what you're saying is you haven't seen DeCastro or Brockers play that much at all, and you need to be convinced by some hypberbole off a scouting report to tell who is better?

Last edited by realtick : 02-05-2012 at 09:53 PM.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #78
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbow44 View Post
So LSU and USC are not high level programs ? Your right Brockers and Perry are underclassmen so they havent played at a high level for as long. And you get me Mario Williams I'll be turning cartwheels.
DeCastro played at a high level as a freshmen and every year till this his Junior season. Perry didnt do much until this year. Brockers similar situation. Not saying they wont pan out. I am surest about the combination of DeCastro and Williams. How many more years do you thnk this core plays at a high level? 1st rounder needs to make an impact this year.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #79
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
DeCastro played at a high level as a freshmen and every year till this his Junior season. Perry didnt do much until this year. Brockers similar situation. Not saying they wont pan out. I am surest about the combination of DeCastro and Williams. How many more years do you thnk this core plays at a high level? 1st rounder needs to make an impact this year.
I find it funny that likely 999 out of 1000 didn't know who Michael Brockers was until just a few weeks ago. Yet, now he's this absolute must have prospect all of a sudden.

He wasn't even on the radar of most professional scouting services for this draft because most assumed he would be staying for at least one more season.

I was more bummed that Brockers teammate Sam Montgomery DE/OLB didn't come out for this draft. I'd love to throw that guy into the passrush mix.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #80
cbow44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post
So really what you're saying is you haven't seen DeCastro or Brockers play that much at all, you need to be convinced by some hypberbole off a scouting report.
jeez where did I say I havent seen them play. And yes, I want to see what the real experts say about them. Certainly not ashamed of that. I guess you dont look at all the draft sites and take their opinions into consideration. Do all your own film work and breakdown, more power to you.

Last edited by Hostile : 02-05-2012 at 10:08 PM.
cbow44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #81
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

[quote=cbow44;4407733]
Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post
So really what you're saying is you haven't seen DeCastro or Brockers play that much at all, you need to be convinced by some hypberbole off a scouting report.[/quote

jeez where did I say I havent seen them play. And yes, I want to see what the real experts say about them. Certainly not ashamed of that. I guess you dont look at all the draft sites and take their opinions into consideration. Do all your own film work and breakdown, more power to you.
Okay, my bad.

I only assume you hadn't seen much of them if you really are relying on the word draft pundits (not scouts) to determine what you're supposedly seeing for yourself. I mean, if you're so fickle that you need to hear an "expert" make a one-to-one comparison between Hutchinson and DeCastro before you think he's the real deal, then....I don't know.

So, are you really telling me in all honesty that you've known of Michael Brockers all season long and have focused in on him during LSU games?
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #82
cbow44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post
I find it funny that likely 999 out of 1000 didn't know who Michael Brockers was until just a few weeks ago. Yet, now he's this absolute must have prospect all of a sudden.

He wasn't even on the radar of most professional scouting services for this draft because most assumed he would be staying for at least one more season.

I was more bummed that Brockers teammate Sam Montgomery DE/OLB didn't come out for this draft. I'd love to throw that guy into the passrush mix.
I went back and looked and cant find anyone who said he was a must have. Just another option to look at. But hey dont let the truth get in the way of another post.
cbow44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #83
cbow44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
550
Default

[quote=realtick;4407753]
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbow44 View Post

Okay, my bad.

I only assume you hadn't seen much of them if you really are relying on the word draft pundits (not scouts) to determine what you're supposedly seeing for yourself. I mean, if you're so fickle that you need to hear an "expert" make a one-to-one comparison between Hutchinson and DeCastro before you think he's the real deal, then....I don't know.

So, are you really telling me in all honesty that you've known of Michael Brockers all season long and have focused in on him during LSU games?
No I didnt, I didnt see Jenkins play in one single game this year either or a dozen other players , I depend on scouting reports on them. I depend on the senior bowl and the combine to seperate people and the experts to tell me why one is better than the other. you act like you dont do the same thing.
cbow44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #84
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbow44 View Post
I went back and looked and cant find anyone who said he was a must have. Just another option to look at. But hey dont let the truth get in the way of another post.
Sweet.

While you're searching for that, please point out where I claimed someone specifically said "Brockers is a must have."

Irony....it always manifests fast and quick on the unassuming.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #85
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

[quote=cbow44;4407795]
Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post

No I didnt, I didnt see Jenkins play in one single game this year either or a dozen other players , I depend on scouting reports on them. I depend on the senior bowl and the combine to seperate people and the experts to tell me why one is better than the other. you act like you dont do the same thing.
So wait, just earlier you objected when I said you hadn't really watched the players in question play, yet now you're admitting that you hadn't watched them play, but depend on the scouting reports.

Game over.

Yeah, I'll read a scouting report from a trusted source, but I'm also aware of the prospects each year that are coming out and actually watch the games, recording them and come to my own conclusions.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #86
cbow44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
550
Default

[quote=realtick;4407804][quote=cbow44;4407795]

So wait, just earlier you objected when I said you hadn't really watched the players in question play, yet now you're admitting that you hadn't watched them play, but depend on the scouting reports.

Game over.

Yeah, I'll read a scouting report from a trusted source, but I'm also aware of the prospects each year that are coming out and actually watch the games, recording them and come to my own conclusions.[/quote

I have you figured out now. when you cant win the debate attack the poster. have at it. I have see enough of your posts to know when it comes to actual facts your not very good.
cbow44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012   #87
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbow44 View Post
I have you figured out now. when you cant win the debate attack the poster. have at it. I have see enough of your posts to know when it comes to actual facts your not very good.


Loooool, so I literally just pointed out what you actually said and that's an attack, and not the "actual facts."

Nice out.

Last edited by realtick : 02-05-2012 at 11:04 PM.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012   #88
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
he has by far fewer question marks then anyone else likely to be there. He fits a position of great need. Not sure why anyone really does not get that?
According to you Burm. The fact is, he has not tested and until that happens, it's pretty much popular opinion on this player.

Be introspective and look at what you are basing your opinions on. Are you saying that you base your opinions on what you know to be true or are you saying that you think this is true?

I think this is a deep draft at the guard position. I will wait to see what the combine and scouts say.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012   #89
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbow44 View Post
If DeCastro is truly the best guard prospect to come along since Steve Hutchinson. A potential hall of fame player then he is hands down the choice. The problem I have, I havent seen that written by anyone other than the posters on here.
Lookie what I found here:

"The best guard coming out since Steve Hutchinson in 2001. DeCastro is intense, explosive, patient, and has excellent recoverability in pass protection."

From Ourlads http://www.ourlads.com/top-32-colleg...t/2012/1178241

You can now have peace of mind knowing that some draft website has said DeCastro and Hutchinson in the same breath.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012   #90
cruz_aedo861
Senior Member
 
cruz_aedo861's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2011
Posts:
102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post
Lookie what I found here:

"The best guard coming out since Steve Hutchinson in 2001. DeCastro is intense, explosive, patient, and has excellent recoverability in pass protection."

From Ourlads http://www.ourlads.com/top-32-colleg...t/2012/1178241

You can now have peace of mind knowing that some draft website has said DeCastro and Hutchinson in the same breath.
pwned great job realtick always enjoy your post and insight.

as much as i like decastro the player i most covet in this draft is janoris jenkins. i grade him higher than morris claiborne and would jump all over him at 14 regardless of the issues. but i dont see that happening.

hey realtick do you see us picking up either tyler hansen (colorado) or aaron corp (richmond)as a udfa. or brock oswiler falling to 4th which i dont see happening
cruz_aedo861 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com