Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2012   #1
CowboyHawg2012
Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2012
Posts:
65
Default Hightower, DeCastro, Barron, or Cox

I think these are the only real options we should think about at 14.
-I really dont want Coples, any player that admits taking a year off should scare the piss out of all of you too. whats going to happen when we hand him a big check?
-Ingram is too much of a "what do we do with him" guy. certainly has the talent, but he is more trouble for our own staff trying to figure out where to put him than he is for opposing offenses
-I would certainly consider Brockers only if we traded down, unquestionable talent, needs some serious refinement in technique but shows glimpses of being dominant. remember, only a redshirt sophmore
-Dont want to touch kirkpatrick honestly, any corner that struggles in man-to-man is a big red flag for me. great in zone ya, but you gotta be able to match up individually in the NFL, cant hide in zone forever.
CowboyHawg2012 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2012   #2
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyHawg2012 View Post
I think these are the only real options we should think about at 14.
-I really dont want Coples, any player that admits taking a year off should scare the piss out of all of you too. whats going to happen when we hand him a big check?
-Ingram is too much of a "what do we do with him" guy. certainly has the talent, but he is more trouble for our own staff trying to figure out where to put him than he is for opposing offenses
-I would certainly consider Brockers only if we traded down, unquestionable talent, needs some serious refinement in technique but shows glimpses of being dominant. remember, only a redshirt sophmore
-Dont want to touch kirkpatrick honestly, any corner that struggles in man-to-man is a big red flag for me. great in zone ya, but you gotta be able to match up individually in the NFL, cant hide in zone forever.
I think Cox will go before 14.

That leaves DeCastro, Barron, and Hightower.

It seems the Cowboys may prefer to go OC earlier than OG in this draft. I would like DeCastro, but I don't think we'll go that way.

That leaves Barron and Hightower from your list of candidates.

I think the Cowboys would probably go with Barron as it's the position of greater need, and I think Barron is probably ranked a touch higher as well.

I agree with you regarding your comments on Coples. It would scare me too.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #3
SilverStarCowboy
The Actualist
 
SilverStarCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
6,007
Default

Rightnow I like Poe, look at his numbers they compare favorably to Suh. He is going to be able to compete and is a need pick moving Rattliff to DE.


SilverStarCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #4
CowboyFan74
NFC Beast Champs
 
CowboyFan74's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Bedford, TX
Posts:
11,202
Send a message via AIM to CowboyFan74 Send a message via MSN to CowboyFan74 Send a message via Yahoo to CowboyFan74
Default

DeCastro or trade down...
CowboyFan74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #5
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,587
Default

I'd be fine with Barron and thrilled with DeCastro. I think some people are a little too high on Cox because they want him to be JJ Watt, but the production and athletisim don't match up.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #6
cbow44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
550
Default

The only player with an elite grade left in your scenario is DeCastro. But if Coples is there I dont hesitate I jump all over him.
cbow44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #7
fifaguy
Senior Member
 
fifaguy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2011
Posts:
2,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverStarCowboy View Post
Rightnow I like Poe, look at his numbers they compare favorably to Suh. He is going to be able to compete and is a need pick moving Rattliff to DE.
I prefer Melvin Ingram. At least he had a great season.... Poe has done nothing on tape. Other than put up nice combine numbers he is a non-factor. He was not even known until than. As we know combine numbers can be completely misleading.
fifaguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #8
btcutter
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverStarCowboy View Post
Rightnow I like Poe, look at his numbers they compare favorably to Suh. He is going to be able to compete and is a need pick moving Rattliff to DE.
No way on Poe. Only numbers he has comparable are combine numbers. His production is dismal. Can't take a guy who's a workout warrior at 14.

Coples is certainly a risk. But he also has gone through coaching changes and position changes. Didn't have a great 2011 campaign but he did the year prior so we know he is capable. Now he is experienced multiple positions and we can play him at the DE or OLB position. At the least he will give you instant upgrade in passrush off the edge in passing downs.
btcutter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #9
Yuma Cactus
Senior Member
 
Yuma Cactus's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2011
Location:
Yuma, AZ
Posts:
626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverStarCowboy View Post
Rightnow I like Poe, look at his numbers they compare favorably to Suh. He is going to be able to compete and is a need pick moving Rattliff to DE.
Poe's measurables may compare to Suh, but Suh was an absolute wrecking ball in college and there was no doubt about how his NFL career would go. Many doubts on Poe.

Cox, Barron or Gilmore for me at this point.
Yuma Cactus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #10
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,357
Default

I dont even see Barron in the question at 14. I think Coples is the guy they are praying for.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #11
btcutter
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
I dont even see Barron in the question at 14. I think Coples is the guy they are praying for.
Coples would be great. I am hoping he turns into a Seymour type DE.
btcutter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #12
Dash28
Felis silvestris catus
 
Dash28's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
5,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
I dont even see Barron in the question at 14. I think Coples is the guy they are praying for.
I think Coples may be there.
Dash28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #13
fortdick
Senior Member
 
fortdick's Avatar
Years Donated
2006, 2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
5,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverStarCowboy View Post
Rightnow I like Poe, look at his numbers they compare favorably to Suh. He is going to be able to compete and is a need pick moving Rattliff to DE.
Not at 14. Too much talk about him being lazy to risk it.
fortdick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #14
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,924
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dash28 View Post
I think Coples may be there.
That would shock me.
He or DeCastro work for me. Otherwise if they can get they right trade down opportunity--not too far down and fair value--they shoud take it.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com