
|
04-02-2012
|
#76
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,779 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeonDeion21
That's bad drafting philosophy. You take the player you think will be the best for the duration of the career, not in year 1. Draft BPA, not a player that fills a need.
The Packers took Aaron Rodgers at #25, didn't help at all immediately. But eventually was the BPA and they sacrificed 3 years to let him develop.
|
Smart man. Listen to this guy.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#77
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,779 |
|
I hope this is wrong only because nobody outside of the organization should have this information.
This is in house stuff that needs to be kept in house.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#78
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | San Antonio |
Posts: | 1,496 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
I hope this is wrong only because nobody outside of the organization should have this information.
This is in house stuff that needs to be kept in house.
|
Especially since Jerry singled out Poe the other day talking about how much they liked him. If this is their true target, then I'm going to dislike it just because they are telling everyone a month before the draft.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#79
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 28 Joker
I think the Cowboys would take Michael Brockers over Poe, Cox, and Coples. Brockers is the purest 5 technique, and Poe and Cox are raw pass rushers just like Brockers, too. According to Charlie Casserly, Coples would not be a good fit as a 5 technique based on his tape at North Carolina. So, Coples would probably be a situational pass rusher in Dallas' scheme. I think Coples is a 43 player.
I think Poe's best use may be as a 3 technique based on my research. Carolina will most likely draft Coples, Brockers, or Poe.
|
I think Coples would play better as a 43 end as well.
You are probably right that the Cowboys prefer Brockers over Poe, Cox, and Coples, but nevertheless, while Brockers is intruiging, I don't think he's going to bring much of a pass rush. Yes, I think he can help control the LOS, set the edge, hopefully push the pocket, but I don't see him as a dynamic player.
Now, there's nothing wrong with the skill set I mentioned above. And to have a successful 34 defense, it is necessary.
My issue is does that player have to be the 14th overall pick in the NFL Draft?
Why not get a more dynamic player at 14? Or at least more of a sure thing. There are a lot of projections that Brockers will develop into more of a pass rusher, etc. Maybe he will, but it doesn't seem that is necessarily his best set of skills.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#80
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeandOut
Especially since Jerry singled out Poe the other day talking about how much they liked him. If this is there true target, then I'm going to dislike it just because they are telling everyone a month before the draft.
|
That's why I think it's a smoke screen.
Just giving too much info on him ....
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#81
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 29,083 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
Completely disagree. You are essentially saying draft for need in round 1.
Draft players for their projected careers. Any production you get year 1 is a bonus.
|
I don't think it has to be either.
You can draft a contributor that is or is not a need.
You could draft a non-contributor with a good projected career that is or is not need.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#82
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,263 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woods
I think Coples would play better as a 43 end as well.
You are probably right that the Cowboys prefer Brockers over Poe, Cox, and Coples, but nevertheless, while Brockers is intruiging, I don't think he's going to bring much of a pass rush. Yes, I think he can help control the LOS, set the edge, hopefully push the pocket, but I don't see him as a dynamic player.
Now, there's nothing wrong with the skill set I mentioned above. And to have a successful 34 defense, it is necessary.
My issue is does that player have to be the 14th overall pick in the NFL Draft?
Why not get a more dynamic player at 14? Or at least more of a sure thing. There are a lot of projections that Brockers will develop into more of a pass rusher, etc. Maybe he will, but it doesn't seem that is necessarily his best set of skills.
|
I actually think Coples will be an excellent 3-4 DE than 4-3 DE. He played DT in 2010 and was much more productive than the years he played DE (soph and senior). I think he can utilize his quickness better between G/T than straight up against T all the time.
I hope he can be a Seymur type player. He certainly has the body type.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#83
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 27,837 |
|
WOW, no one has caught it yet?
First player cowboys loved was cordy glenn. Who is reported to go 17th to 21st in 1st round.
Cowboys possibly could trade down, pick up a 3rd or 2nd depending how far down trade down, get Cordy Glenn, remember Calahan went and checked out Zietler OG who can play C and the C from Wisconsin.
But now we hear Cordy Glenn.
Finally, one thing Jerry has repeatedly said was they must protect Romo.
Put Glenn by Tyron Smith and you could have a huge pass blocking and run blocking on left side.
Or you could team Glenn with Doug Free, and have 2 big linemen on right side.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#84
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
im calling smokescreen on this one
i almost never use the smokescreen excuse..as a matter of fact, this may be my first time..however, i do recall reading something earlier that said we didnt like poe and we were pleased he blew up the combine..couple this report with mosleys report and HOPEFULLY its our attempt to build up his stock to ensure he gets drafted before us
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#85
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 5,674 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyjoe
WOW, no one has caught it yet?
First player cowboys loved was cordy glenn. Who is reported to go 17th to 21st in 1st round.
Cowboys possibly could trade down, pick up a 3rd or 2nd depending how far down trade down, get Cordy Glenn, remember Calahan went and checked out Zietler OG who can play C and the C from Wisconsin.
But now we hear Cordy Glenn.
Finally, one thing Jerry has repeatedly said was they must protect Romo.
Put Glenn by Tyron Smith and you could have a huge pass blocking and run blocking on left side.
Or you could team Glenn with Doug Free, and have 2 big linemen on right side.
|
Plus, Cordy Glenn can fill in at OT if needed.
Versatility is a plus. He can play four OL positions.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#86
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyjoe
WOW, no one has caught it yet?
First player cowboys loved was cordy glenn. Who is reported to go 17th to 21st in 1st round.
Cowboys possibly could trade down, pick up a 3rd or 2nd depending how far down trade down, get Cordy Glenn, remember Calahan went and checked out Zietler OG who can play C and the C from Wisconsin.
But now we hear Cordy Glenn.
Finally, one thing Jerry has repeatedly said was they must protect Romo.
Put Glenn by Tyron Smith and you could have a huge pass blocking and run blocking on left side.
Or you could team Glenn with Doug Free, and have 2 big linemen on right side.
|
just about this entire board, myself included, would blow their load, if our 1st two picks were glenn via a trade down and konz via a trade up....not happening though
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#87
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 11,357 |
|
More talk that Dontari Poe’s draft stock is sinking
Another day, another sign that the shine of Dontari Poe’s impressive Scouting Combine performance is wearing off.
Yesterday we passed along a report that quoted an NFL scout saying Poe “didn’t do anything” on tape and that the talk of Poe as a potential Top 5 pick was based solely on his Combine showing, when he ran a 4.87-second 40-yard dash and bench pressed 225 pounds 44 times. Today NFL Network’s Mike Mayock has altered his rankings of the Top 5 players at each position, and Poe falls further than anyone.
Mayock listed Poe as the top defensive tackle in the draft after the Combine, but after spending more time watching tape, Mayock has dropped Poe down to the fourth-best defensive tackle, behind Mississippi State’s Fletcher Cox, Michigan State’s Jerel Worthy and LSU’s Michael Brockers.
“Coming off the Combine I wanted to show people what a freak this kid Poe is — and he is a physical freak, no doubt,” Mayock said. “However, the tape is very average. So how do you match the two up? Potential versus his actual game footage. When I look at this kid I see a freaky athlete with a good motor. If you have those two things, over time I believe you can develop into a high-quality NFL player. But the key is time. How quickly can he step in and produce at a high level?”
Mayock said he doesn’t think Poe is a player who’s going to be a good NFL starter as a rookie. He thinks Poe is going to need some time to develop.
“He needs to get into a good locker room, with a mentor in that defensive line group who can show this kid how to play football,” Mayock said.
So a team that wants to spend its first-round pick on a Week One starter would be wise to look at someone other than Poe.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ck-is-sinking/
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#88
|
|
The Actualist
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 6,007 |
|
Screw Mayock, Poe starts for Dallas week 1, day 1 and play 1.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#89
|
|
28 Joker
Joined: | Apr 2007 |
Posts: | 7,878 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woods
I think Coples would play better as a 43 end as well.
You are probably right that the Cowboys prefer Brockers over Poe, Cox, and Coples, but nevertheless, while Brockers is intruiging, I don't think he's going to bring much of a pass rush. Yes, I think he can help control the LOS, set the edge, hopefully push the pocket, but I don't see him as a dynamic player.
Now, there's nothing wrong with the skill set I mentioned above. And to have a successful 34 defense, it is necessary.
My issue is does that player have to be the 14th overall pick in the NFL Draft?
Why not get a more dynamic player at 14? Or at least more of a sure thing. There are a lot of projections that Brockers will develop into more of a pass rusher, etc. Maybe he will, but it doesn't seem that is necessarily his best set of skills.
|
I hear you, and I see what you mean for sure. I have been against drafting any of these defensive linemen due to the risk in all of them and due to the significant risk of drafting the position in round 1, especially for a team like Dallas. Plus, there will be other cleaner players on the board who meet significant needs. If someone forced me to choose one, I'd choose Michael Brockers, though. I'd take the purest 34 5 technique who has the most upside and hope the coaches could turn him into a disruptive pass rusher.
This is just my opinion, but I think Dallas' top 4 players at 14 will be:
Mark Barron- S VS Brodney Poole (1 year deal) and Gerald Sensabaugh
Michael Brockers- 5 technique VS Kenyon Coleman
Dre Kirkpatrick- CB VS Mike Jenkins (walk year and coming off injury)
Peter Konz- C VS Costa, Nagy, and Kowalski
Dallas could use all of those players, but perhaps, they could nab 2 if they draft a defensive player first and trade back into round one and draft Peter Konz. Tennessee could look at Konz, and Green Bay and Baltimore are threats to take him for sure, especially Baltimore. I think the drop-off from Konz to Blake/Jones is very significant, and I believe Callahan wants Konz to solidify the offensive line for a reason. Konz is the day one starter at center, and he solidifies the offensive line at center.
All 4 of those guys are good players, but I do see Brockers as the highest risk among the 4 due to his raw inexperience.
Last edited by 28 Joker : 04-02-2012 at 06:16 PM.
|
|
|
04-02-2012
|
#90
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2008 |
Location: | valley ranch |
Posts: | 3,925 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12
Another day, another sign that the shine of Dontari Poe’s impressive Scouting Combine performance is wearing off.
Yesterday we passed along a report that quoted an NFL scout saying Poe “didn’t do anything” on tape and that the talk of Poe as a potential Top 5 pick was based solely on his Combine showing, when he ran a 4.87-second 40-yard dash and bench pressed 225 pounds 44 times. Today NFL Network’s Mike Mayock has altered his rankings of the Top 5 players at each position, and Poe falls further than anyone.
Mayock listed Poe as the top defensive tackle in the draft after the Combine, but after spending more time watching tape, Mayock has dropped Poe down to the fourth-best defensive tackle, behind Mississippi State’s Fletcher Cox, Michigan State’s Jerel Worthy and LSU’s Michael Brockers.
[View Full Quote]“Coming off the Combine I wanted to show people what a freak this kid Poe is — and he is a physical freak, no doubt,” Mayock said. “However, the tape is very average. So how do you match the two up? Potential versus his actual game footage. When I look at this kid I see a freaky athlete with a good motor. If you have those two things, over time I believe you can develop into a high-quality NFL player. But the key is time. How quickly can he step in and produce at a high level?”
Mayock said he doesn’t think Poe is a player who’s going to be a good NFL starter as a rookie. He thinks Poe is going to need some time to develop.
“He needs to get into a good locker room, with a mentor in that defensive line group who can show this kid how to play football,” Mayock said.
So a team that wants to spend its first-round pick on a Week One starter would be wise to look at someone other than Poe.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ck-is-sinking/
|
This seems fair but he did play nose guard and he would be a top 5 pick if had better stats and we would not have a shot at him at all.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.
|