
|
04-06-2012
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 411 |
|
Bruce Irvin vs D.Ware Combine/Stats
I'd like to see him drafted in the 2nd.
He's much more explosive than Spencer. Then the team
could save money and let Spencer walk.
DWare
40-4.56
B.Irvin
40-4.50
DWare
Shuttle 4.07
B.Irvin
Shuttle 4.03
DWare
Cone 6.85
B.Irvin
Cone 6.70
DWare
Vert. 38.5
B.Irvin
Vert 33.5
DWare
Bench 27
B.Irvin 23
Last Year in College
DWare
Sacks 10.5 TFL 19 TK 53
B.Irvin
Sacks 8.5 TFL 15 TK 40
DWare
HT 6.4 WT 250
B.Irvin
HT 6.3 WT 245
DWare
Arm Length 34
B.Irvin
Arm Length 33 3/8
Dware
Broad 122in
B.Irvin 123in
|
|
|
04-06-2012
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Edmonton, Albert |
Posts: | 12,201 |
|
I love the Irvin pick and we should really make sure we draft him.
It is one thing to put up his combine numbers which are very good but just watch him play. He just seems to have the innate sense to hunt down QBs. He is extremely good at turning the corner on a speed rush and is deadly on his inside counter. I can see him putting up double digits his rookie year playing opposite Ware.
He may never be anything more than a nickel pass rusher but I"d be okay with that. It is the position we have the most trouble drafting. Outside of Greg Ellis who did it once and Tony Tolbert who also did it once we haven't drafted a double digit sack guy other than DeMarcus Ware since Jim Jeffcoat back in 1983. That is 30 years to draft a guy who had two double digit sack years.
So when I see a guy on film who can do it I want to pick him even if it is the only thing he can do well.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 877 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo
I love the Irvin pick and we should really make sure we draft him.
It is one thing to put up his combine numbers which are very good but just watch him play. He just seems to have the innate sense to hunt down QBs. He is extremely good at turning the corner on a speed rush and is deadly on his inside counter. I can see him putting up double digits his rookie year playing opposite Ware.
He may never be anything more than a nickel pass rusher but I"d be okay with that. It is the position we have the most trouble drafting. Outside of Greg Ellis who did it once and Tony Tolbert who also did it once we haven't drafted a double digit sack guy other than DeMarcus Ware since Jim Jeffcoat back in 1983. That is 30 years to draft a guy who had two double digit sack years.
So when I see a guy on film who can do it I want to pick him even if it is the only thing he can do well.
|
If he got 23 sacks playing as an EXTREMELY UNDERSIZED 5-tech (in a 3-3-5) alignment, imagine what he could do from the OLB position - especially when someone teaches him how to properly rush the passer.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 3,264 |
|
I like Irvin as a 3rd down rusher.
I think he'll get engulfed trying to stop the run as a SOLB though.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#5
|
|
Defender of the Star
Joined: | Nov 2004 |
Location: | Ozark, Missouri |
Posts: | 5,471 |
|
won't be surprised at all if he is our pick at 45. Combine that with either cox or barron in round 1 and the defense improves.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Sep 2011 |
Posts: | 2,646 |
|
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#7
|
|
Seldom Seen
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,147 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Realist
I like Irvin as a 3rd down rusher.
I think he'll get engulfed trying to stop the run as a SOLB though.
|
Setting the edge is more about technique than brute strength. I'm hoping after a year he learns better technique both as a run defender and getting more pass rush moves. Much like Ware who learned from Haley, a speed rusher has to be able to go inside in order to make tackles respect the edge.
I like Bruce in the 2nd. Here is my rule: pure pass rushers like Irvin are rare; if given the opportunity to draft one, you should.
Just keep in mind, back in the day, small DE like Irvin were the classic OLB. He can 15 lbs of muscle w/o any loss in speed.
I am a Dallas Cowboys fan on a Dallas Cowboys forum. I will probably defend my team if I feel the need. If this in some way offends you, I invite you to avoid my posts.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Sep 2008 |
Posts: | 166 |
|
I have a serious lust for Irvin... care more about getting him than anyone in the first. If we have to trade up to the end of the 1st or early 2nd I would.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#9
|
|
Surrealist
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 43,249 |
|
Seems a little high risk to warrant a second round pick to me.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 4,473 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt
Seems a little high risk to warrant a second round pick to me.
|
agreed
if he is there with our third round pick, run to the podium
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 3,264 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt
Seems a little high risk to warrant a second round pick to me.
|
If I had an extra 2nd rounder I would. But agreed.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#12
|
|
Member
|
You guys have to realize that DeMarcus was much bigger and stronger than Irvin, relative to the slight speed advantage Irvin has.... And Irvin couldn't replace Spencer on the strong side. He's not big and powerful enough to play the run
... At least not this early in his career and, assuming we draft him, it would be a stretch to have him be able to play the run as well as Spencer in year 2 of his career if we left Spencer walk after this year.
There's a reason Spencer was considered the second best 3-4 OLB after Mario Williams in FA this year. Stop dogging on him because he doesn't get a lot of sacks, he plays a different role in the defense.
The defense which, by the way, he is probably the 4th best player of. Unless Carr can beat him out of that spot of course. Then he would be the 5th best player of what would hopefully be a very good defense at that point.
In fact, this is going to sound stupid, but if I had to rate them in terms of overall Madden ratings (Yeah I know, what a joke, but whatever)....
ROLB Ware: 99
NT Ratliff: 91; DE Ratliff: 93
ILB Lee: 89
CB Carr if he ends up progressing at his current rate: 88
LOLB Spencer: 87
CB Carr if he is the same as he was last year: 85
CB Jenkins: 83
ILB Dan Conner if he works out like I think he will: 83
ILB Dan Conner if he stays about the level he was in Carolina: 80
S Sensabaugh: 79
ILB Dan Conner if I'm an idiot: 78
CB Scandrick: 77
RE Hatcher: 77
LE Spears: 75; NT Spears: 76
S Brodney Pool: 74
DL Lissemore: 72
So yeah, I personally think Spencer is pretty good. I also think we could use some S and DL help, lol.
EDIT: Also, you can probably tell that I'm borderline awful at staying on topic. And by borderline I mean the borderline between awful and absolutely horrendous.
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | May 2005 |
Location: | WHITE SANDS NM |
Posts: | 38,165 |
|
If spencer is the 4th best player on our D then it is an indictment of our D.
Frankly the fact that he is solid against the run becomes less and less important each year. As regards coverage- all anyone that big can do is occupy an area; not really cover anyone.
If we could get a guy there that the D has to worry about then that changes a whole lot of things.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM
Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#14
|
|
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
Joined: | Feb 2005 |
Location: | Falconer, NY |
Posts: | 13,894 |
|
I just got done watching two separate WV games again and while Irvin showed the explosive ability we all knew he had he is far from ready to turn into a legitimate and consistent threat at the next level.
He can be absolutely owned by smaller offensive lineman. His only two major threats in his rush package is by either simply beating the man in front of him off the LOS or the up and under against bigger lineman. At the next level those two moves will be negated somewhat. He needs to add another 10 pounds in muscle, he has no finesse game what so ever.
He will be liability in the run game because he will get chewed up in tight spaces.
His ceiling is off the charts but how much time are you willing to invest in him with a 2nd round pick. Perhaps the temptation is stronger if he's does not have bonehead character issues to go along with him.
I was on the fence about taking him in 2 and had to go back and see if I could push myself one way or the other. I did, I pushed myself the other. I don't touch him before the 3rd.
Quote:
|
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
|
|
|
|
04-07-2012
|
#15
|
|
Member
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDogo
I just got done watching two separate WV games again and while Irvin showed the explosive ability we all knew he had he is far from ready to turn into a legitimate and consistent threat at the next level.
He can be absolutely owned by smaller offensive lineman. His only two major threats in his rush package is by either simply beating the man in front of him off the LOS or the up and under against bigger lineman. At the next level those two moves will be negated somewhat. He needs to add another 10 pounds in muscle, he has no finesse game what so ever.
He will be liability in the run game because he will get chewed up in tight spaces.
His ceiling is off the charts but how much time are you willing to invest in him with a 2nd round pick. Perhaps the temptation is stronger if he's does not have bonehead character issues to go along with him.
[View Full Quote]I was on the fence about taking him in 2 and had to go back and see if I could push myself one way or the other. I did, I pushed myself the other. I don't touch him before the 3rd.
|
Good study
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.
|