Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2012   #31
Mash
Senior Member
 
Mash's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Canada
Posts:
4,060
Default

Stephen and Jerry dont evaluate talent.....

The listen to people around them....people who get paid to do that stuff.

I think alot of the stuff they spew on radio is just jibberish....
John 16:22 And ye therefore now have sorrow: but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no one taketh away from you.
Mash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #32
TheSport78
The Excellence of Execution
 
TheSport78's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
7,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mash View Post
Stephen and Jerry dont evaluate talent.....

The listen to people around them....people who get paid to do that stuff.

I think alot of the stuff they spew on radio is just jibberish....
Then can you explain Quincy Carter, Felix Jones, Jason Williams, Robert Brewster, etc.? lol
TheSport78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #33
ABQcowboyJR
Senior Member
 
ABQcowboyJR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
2,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSport78 View Post
Then can you explain Quincy Carter, Felix Jones, Jason Williams, Robert Brewster, etc.? lol
Pre JG... Lets see what the draft style will be now.
ABQcowboyJR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #34
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stasheroo View Post
Very true, excellent points. And great job with that research!



But, I would say that New England has done it without short-changing themselves at other positions as they have maintained a high level of success during that time.

I would not consider the current Cowboys as having that luxury.
They have maintained a high level of success on the offense...their defense last year was not exactly stellar.

It seems they decide to draft on the idea of BPA or the idea that they want to keep the offense up and choose to concentrate more on that side of the ball.

That last draft is really crazy considering they had so many needs on defense yet they only drafted a total of three players on defense and instead decided to draft 2 RBs, A QB and yet ANOTHER TE even though they had Gronk at Hernandez.

So...Maybe, just maybe if we get fleener in the second, it might be because they think he is the BPA and they also want to further strengthen the offense.
Now There are other areas I would rather address myself so we are in the same boat here, but there is also other things to consider and just because it might not be what we want does not automatically make it silly...although sometimes it is silly.


BrAinPaiNt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #35
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
1-star thread
Posts:
32,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSport78 View Post
Then can you explain Quincy Carter, Felix Jones, Jason Williams, Robert Brewster, etc.? lol
No comprendo... Are you saying the scouts and coaches couldn't have made those evaluations because they were bad? (Now Quincy was a JJ pick, we know that.)
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #36
TheSport78
The Excellence of Execution
 
TheSport78's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
7,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQcowboyJR View Post
Pre JG... Lets see what the draft style will be now.
That's true. Let's hope those days are over!
TheSport78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #37
SilverStarCowboy
The Actualist
 
SilverStarCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
6,006
Default

A TE in a very weak TE class. Our Front Office repeatedly/constantly leaves a lot to be desired to say the least.


SilverStarCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #38
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt View Post
They have maintained a high level of success on the offense...their defense last year was not exactly stellar.

It seems they decide to draft on the idea of BPA or the idea that they want to keep the offense up and choose to concentrate more on that side of the ball.

That last draft is really crazy considering they had so many needs on defense yet they only drafted a total of three players on defense and instead decided to draft 2 RBs, A QB and yet ANOTHER TE even though they had Gronk at Hernandez.

So...Maybe, just maybe if we get fleener in the second, it might be because they think he is the BPA and they also want to further strengthen the offense.
[View Full Quote]
When you have a HOF QB you can get away with sucking mostly everywhere else. Ask the Colts.
jterrell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #39
cowboysooner
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2010
Posts:
1,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
and both times he mentioned backup Tight End.


Then I see Bill Jones mock and he has us trading down and taking Fleener in the 1st round.


Now I could see us going Fleener in round 2 if he somehow was at our pick but I can't see us going TE until Round 3 at the earliest.


Anyone worried we may go TE in the 2nd round and it won't be Fleener?
If you told me I had 2 picks after #10 to make my offense better in the near and long term, Fleener would be one of the picks. You would get more dynamic plays and edge pass protection in a division of edge rushers from being in a base 2 tight end set than most other things you could do offensively.

I would certainly pick Fleener (plus an additional 2nd) and one of the second round guard/centers over 2 more interior linemen.

I'd rather go defense, but I get why we would want to add Fleener a 6-6 guy who can run a 4.5 and knows how to find holes in zones is pretty valuable.
cowboysooner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #40
TheSport78
The Excellence of Execution
 
TheSport78's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
7,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocolate Lab View Post
No comprendo... Are you saying the scouts and coaches couldn't have made those evaluations because they were bad? (Now Quincy was a JJ pick, we know that.)
Jerry chose Felix when there were higher RB's on the board. Strictly a Garrett/Jerry pick.

Jason Williams was a Wade Philips pick and Jerry listened to him. Jerry's fault. Wade isn't a scout.

Brewster? Who knows, but can our scouts really be that horrific with scouting offensive linemen? I hope not!
TheSport78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #41
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

I like Fleener, but to me he only makes sense if the Cowboys are just completely doing away with using a 3rd WR for nickel packages and using a 2 TE set in nickel .... because they currently they have no 3rd WR for nickel packages.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #42
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSport78 View Post
Then can you explain Quincy Carter, Felix Jones, Jason Williams, Robert Brewster, etc.? lol
Of those only Carter was a Jerry pet cat.

JG loved Felix. He felt his offense truly needed that speed dimension and pass threat out of the back field. He drew up plays to show how he could use Felix before the draft. ---And Felix has been solid thus far not a waste.

Jason Williams and Brewster were just all-around draft misses but hardly guys Jerry or Stephen were in love with.

Believe it or not every team misses on guys.
jterrell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #43
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboysooner View Post
If you told me I had 2 picks after #10 to make my offense better in the near and long term, Fleener would be one of the picks. You would get more dynamic plays and edge pass protection in a division of edge rushers from being in a base 2 tight end set than most other things you could do offensively.

I would certainly pick Fleener (plus an additional 2nd) and one of the second round guard/centers over 2 more interior linemen.

I'd rather go defense, but I get why we would want to add Fleener a 6-6 guy who can run a 4.5 and knows how to find holes in zones is pretty valuable.
Fleener can not block.
jterrell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #44
stasheroo
Senior Member
 
stasheroo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2006
Posts:
15,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt View Post
They have maintained a high level of success on the offense...their defense last year was not exactly stellar.

It seems they decide to draft on the idea of BPA or the idea that they want to keep the offense up and choose to concentrate more on that side of the ball.

That last draft is really crazy considering they had so many needs on defense yet they only drafted a total of three players on defense and instead decided to draft 2 RBs, A QB and yet ANOTHER TE even though they had Gronk at Hernandez.
It's one issue I have with New England's recent draft as well as free agency moves.

I feel they've been neglecting pass rusher and cornerback for far too long and I think it's come back to haunt them.

Quote:
So...Maybe, just maybe if we get fleener in the second, it might be because they think he is the BPA and they also want to further strengthen the offense.
Again, I can agree with improving the offense but I don;t think a #2 TE is the way to do it. No knock on Fleener, just that this team has bigger needs elsewhere.

Quote:
Now There are other areas I would rather address myself so we are in the same boat here, but there is also other things to consider and just because it might not be what we want does not automatically make it silly...although sometimes it is silly.
Very true. But conversely, just because the Cowboys make a move, that doesn;t automatically make it the right move (no matter what some people would like to think).

Many people, inside and outside of the game have stated that the Cowboys have overlooked both lines for far too long and their underwhelming results have supported that belief.


"I don't understand it Stephen, it's opening day 2014, where is everybody?"
stasheroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #45
TheSport78
The Excellence of Execution
 
TheSport78's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
7,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell View Post
Of those only Carter was a Jerry pet cat.

JG loved Felix. He felt his offense truly needed that speed dimension and pass threat out of the back field. He drew up plays to show how he could use Felix before the draft. ---And Felix has been solid thus far not a waste.

Jason Williams and Brewster were just all-around draft misses but hardly guys Jerry or Stephen were in love with.

Believe it or not every team misses on guys.
Jerry should not get a pass on the Felix pick. He hasn't been solid. He's been the definition of a frustrating draft pick with "potential." And considering the other RB's that were on the board (Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, Jamaal Charles), it's a huge miss. Another example of Jerry listening to his coaches and not his scouts.
TheSport78 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com