Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-19-2012   #1
a_minimalist
Senior Member
 
a_minimalist's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
Earth
Posts:
4,531
Default If we get DeCastro at #14

If we get DeCastro at #14 would you be willing to reach and draft Bruce Irvin in round 2 at #45? It sounds like a couple of teams are really interested and there's always the possibility they reach.

I would be okay with reaching and drafting him in round 2. I like him that much.
a_minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-19-2012   #2
SilverStarCowboy
The Actualist
 
SilverStarCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
6,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a_minimalist View Post
If we get DeCastro at #14 would you be willing to reach and draft Bruce Irvin in round 2 at #45? It sounds like a couple of teams are really interested and there's always the possibility they reach.

I would be okay with reaching and drafting him in round 2. I like him that much.
Sounds good but doubting Bruce Irvin will be considered a reach at #45 and if DeCastro or Cox are there, why reach in the 2nd there is value beyond OLB.


SilverStarCowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #3
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

I've never heard anyone say they'd be okay with reaching.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #4
SDogo
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
 
SDogo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Falconer, NY
Posts:
13,894
Default

Heck no, you have a solid smart draft going, why ruin it with the next pick.
Quote:
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
SDogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #5
pupulehaole
Senior Member
 
pupulehaole's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2009
Posts:
1,153
Default

I know Bruce Irvin has been talked about as a 3rd rounder but is drafting him @ 45 a huge reach? I don't know much about him other than he's very raw n has the physical tools and showed he can have great upside.
“When you surround an army, leave an outlet free. Do not press a desperate foe too hard.”
-Sun Tzu
pupulehaole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #6
a_minimalist
Senior Member
 
a_minimalist's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
Earth
Posts:
4,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
I've never heard anyone say they'd be okay with reaching.
I mean technically it wouldn't be reaching. Think of Ware being projected to go in the second round and then us taking him at #11. That at the time was a reach. I think Irvin who is projected to go in the 3rd by most being taken in the 2nd is a smart "reach."


Quote:
Originally Posted by SDogo View Post
Heck no, you have a solid smart draft going, why ruin it with the next pick.
You'd know more about Bruce Irvin than I would but he seems like he just has a knack for getting after people and QB's. He's a beast.

As we inch closer to draft day I'm starting to doubt he will even be around in the 3rd round and I'd love to see him wearing a .
a_minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #7
VThokie7
Senior Member
 
VThokie7's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Baltimore, MD
Posts:
1,334
Default

It took a lot of losing accompanied with fan and media outcry for Jerry to break his habit of reaching. Why give him the chance to return to his old ways? No reaching!
VThokie7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #8
a_minimalist
Senior Member
 
a_minimalist's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
Earth
Posts:
4,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VThokie7 View Post
It took a lot of losing accompanied with fan and media outcry for Jerry to break his habit of reaching. Why give him the chance to return to his old ways? No reaching!
Well I agree. But I still behind the fact that it really isn't reaching.

It's reaching, but it really isn't reaching.
a_minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #9
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,957
Default

If we take a player at 45, I would like to think we vlaue him in the tier that puts at or near 45. If we don't have him valued that way then there's never a reason to take him there if we can help it.
DFWJC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #10
Wulfman
Unofficial GM
 
Wulfman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,271
Default

IF Irvin was the highest rated player on their board, then I'd be fine with the pick. But then it's not reaching, and unless they are valuing him WAY higher than they should be, he won't be at the top of their board at #45. If he is, they've got much bigger problems.

The Cowboys have WAY too many holes to fill to reach for anyone.
"Contrary to popular opinion, you CAN lead a horse to water AND make him drink...you just have to hold his head under water long enough."

- Wulf
Wulfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #11
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,727
Default

Good question.

There is a good chance that Irvin will be the highest rated player on "my" board at #45; however, if I'm the team and think that he will be available at 81, then I'd wait.

I've thought about this senerio before. What if a player is the highest rated on a team's board at a given pick, BUT they are convinced that every other team has him rated at least 1 round lower?
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #12
Wulfman
Unofficial GM
 
Wulfman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
Good question.

There is a good chance that Irvin will be the highest rated player on "my" board at #45; however, if I'm the team and think that he will be available at 81, then I'd wait.

I've thought about this senerio before. What if a player is the highest rated on a team's board at a given pick, BUT they are convinced that every other team has him rated at least 1 round lower?
As a rule of thumb, when I face this question, I choose to take another player who I know is rated as worthy of the pick and take a chance the other will fall to the next round. No one player short of a franchise Qb at the top of the first is going to make or break the draft, and there are usually enough other quality players to take that taking an unnecessary risk is...well...unnecessary.
"Contrary to popular opinion, you CAN lead a horse to water AND make him drink...you just have to hold his head under water long enough."

- Wulf
Wulfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #13
texbumthelife
Senior Member
 
texbumthelife's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2007
Posts:
1,871
Default

If the highest rated player on your board is there you have two good options.

You take him and don't take any chances.
or
You trade back a bit and hope he is still there.

Personally, I don't think Irvin is a reach midway through the second no matter how the draft shapes up.
texbumthelife is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com