Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2012   #61
RoyTheHammer
Cab to Kinko's
 
RoyTheHammer's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Location:
State College, P
Posts:
11,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supercowboy8 View Post
Doea Jenkins ever play the slot or nickel. You can't cut scandrick right now after the season and save, the cap hit will be bigger than what you will pay him next year. Sorry to tell ya, Jenkins is gone after thia year. Sorry i was wrong for calling him small, but he Isnt going to be in Dallas after this year
What would the cap hit be if we kept Scandrick, and what would it be if we cut him after the season?
RoyTheHammer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #62
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys&LakersFan View Post
This makes no sense at all. You just admitted than Jenkins is far better than Scandrick you have him as the fourth corner? Ridiculous.
Did you read anything I just wrote. I said Jenkins Is better on the outside. But your nickel back is your #3 CB. Also we cant release scandrick with out a big cap hit and Jenkins isn't going to sign to be a #3 when he can get starter money.
Overall I think Jenkins is a better cb than scandrick, but Dallas has scandrick out there on the nickel not Jenkins. That makes scandrick our #3.
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #63
RoyTheHammer
Cab to Kinko's
 
RoyTheHammer's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Location:
State College, P
Posts:
11,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supercowboy8 View Post
Did you read anything I just wrote. I said Jenkins Is better on the outside. But your nickel back is your #3 CB. Also we cant release scandrick with out a big cap hit and Jenkins isn't going to sign to be a #3 when he can get starter money.
Overall I think Jenkins is a better cb than scandrick, but Dallas has scandrick out there on the nickel not Jenkins. That makes scandrick our #3.
So again, what would Scandrick's cap number be for us if we keep him next year, and what will it be if we cut him after this season?

Also, you can call Scandrick whatever number on the depth chart that you want, but Jenkins plays more because he's better..

..far better.
RoyTheHammer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #64
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer View Post


Sorry.. 12 lbs heavier.. not 10. As if any of us knows their actual weights in the first place.

Point was he's not that much smaller, and not "small" for CB at all.

I don't think he makes nearly as many "business decisions" as people want to believe. I think he made one or two of them during 2009 or 2010 and since then people want to jump all over how he's "soft" or "lazy" or he "takes plays off", etc, etc.. when none of that is true at all.

[View Full Quote]
ROFL. I am one of Mike Jenkins' biggest fans.

Jenkins is significantly smaller than Carr. Unless of course he magically grew since the combine. Those heights/weights are official and well documented.

Carr plays a physical game at the line of scrimmage and is a tough tackler. He never seems to pull up gimpy after these hits.
Mike Jenkins is not. He has stuck his head in there to make tackles before but he comes up banged up a lot in those exchanges. At 5'10" and under 200 pounds he just isn't a really big guy. 12 pounds is actually a fair amount; especially when it is muscle. But the truth is Jenkins probably plays closer to 185. He is a smallish guy with a slight build and would have wanted to add weight for the combine. Carr is a naturally bigger guy.

Those aren't knocks they are just basic facts.

I'd love to keep Jenkins. I'd entertain franchising him if we had to to keep him. I love the defense we have now that we have a handful of quality cover guys and hate to lose 1 for nothing.
jterrell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #65
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer View Post
What would the cap hit be if we kept Scandrick, and what would it be if we cut him after the season?
good question. Scandrick cap hit next year will be 3.78 million if on the team, if released he will be a 6.52 million cap hit.

Then you need to also remember we have a 5 million fine we have to pay. I believe as of now we will have almost 20 million is cap space next year, Adam could probably answer this better, then the 5 million fine. Then you will have to most likely franchise Jenkins which will be 10 million for a CB. Jenkins will get offers to be atleast a #2 CB elsewhere which will be more than we will be able to offer him.
So if you release Scandrick it will be a 2.74 million add on, then 10 million to jenkins which will be 12.74 million of the 15 million available to spend. So where do we look at helping the OL or any other hole. It just can't happen.
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #66
RoyTheHammer
Cab to Kinko's
 
RoyTheHammer's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Location:
State College, P
Posts:
11,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell View Post
ROFL. I am one of Mike Jenkins' biggest fans.

Jenkins is significantly smaller than Carr. Unless of course he magically grew since the combine. Those heights/weights are official and well documented.

Carr plays a physical game at the line of scrimmage and is a tough tackler. He never seems to pull up gimpy after these hits.
Mike Jenkins is not. He has stuck his head in there to make tackles before but he comes up banged up a lot in those exchanges. At 5'10" and under 200 pounds he just isn't a really big guy. 12 pounds is actually a fair amount; especially when it is muscle. But the truth is Jenkins probably plays closer to 185. He is a smallish guy with a slight build and would have wanted to add weight for the combine. Carr is a naturally bigger guy.

Those aren't knocks they are just basic facts.

[View Full Quote]
Im not denying that you are a fan of Jenkins.. clearly you are and realize his value to this team.

Im just stating that i don't feel like 10 lbs lighter is a significant difference and i don't feel like Jenkins is "small" for the position at all. Jenkins doesn't have a safety type build.. but he's a pure cover corner. The effort is still there in his tackling though and he made a couple hits last year that were bigger than any other DB on the team, CB or S. Sure he may come up roughed up a bit, but he played through the pain. Gotta give him credit for that.
RoyTheHammer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #67
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer View Post
So again, what would Scandrick's cap number be for us if we keep him next year, and what will it be if we cut him after this season?

Also, you can call Scandrick whatever number on the depth chart that you want, but Jenkins plays more because he's better..

..far better.
yes he is better far better on the outside. But Scandrick job is the nickel, and gets paid like the nickel. He is to man the slot and not the outside. Thats why we spend all the money on Carr and traded up to get Claiborne.No matter how great Jenkins plays he isn't going to sign to stay a #3 rather we cut Scandrick or not, and we won't have the money to franchise Jenkins.
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #68
RoyTheHammer
Cab to Kinko's
 
RoyTheHammer's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Location:
State College, P
Posts:
11,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supercowboy8 View Post
good question. Scandrick cap hit next year will be 3.78 million if on the team, if released he will be a 6.52 million cap hit.

Then you need to also remember we have a 5 million fine we have to pay. I believe as of now we will have almost 20 million is cap space next year, Adam could probably answer this better, then the 5 million fine. Then you will have to most likely franchise Jenkins which will be 10 million for a CB. Jenkins will get offers to be atleast a #2 CB elsewhere which will be more than we will be able to offer him.
So if you release Scandrick it will be a 2.74 million add on, then 10 million to jenkins which will be 12.74 million of the 15 million available to spend. So where do we look at helping the OL or any other hole. It just can't happen.
Not to be picky, but can i get some sort of link for where you are finding these figures?
RoyTheHammer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #69
Cowboys&LakersFan
Banned
 
Joined:
Dec 2010
Posts:
14,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supercowboy8 View Post
yes he is better far better on the outside. But Scandrick job is the nickel, and gets paid like the nickel. He is to man the slot and not the outside. Thats why we spend all the money on Carr and traded up to get Claiborne.No matter how great Jenkins plays he isn't going to sign to stay a #3 rather we cut Scandrick or not, and we won't have the money to franchise Jenkins.
How the hell do you know that? You're not his agent.
Cowboys&LakersFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #70
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer View Post
Im not denying that you are a fan of Jenkins.. clearly you are and realize his value to this team.

Im just stating that i don't feel like 10 lbs lighter is a significant difference and i don't feel like Jenkins is "small" for the position at all. Jenkins doesn't have a safety type build.. but he's a pure cover corner. The effort is still there in his tackling though and he made a couple hits last year that were bigger than any other DB on the team, CB or S. Sure he may come up roughed up a bit, but he played through the pain. Gotta give him credit for that.
you right, he manned up and play through pain last year. I give him credit and I wish him the best. I hope he plays great for us and makes us miss him next year. I want as many great CBs on this team as possible but with the salary cap and other holes that needs more attention we can't afford to franchise Jenkins.
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #71
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys&LakersFan View Post
How the hell do you know that? You're not his agent.
why would he? I might not be his agent but its called common sense. Jerry goes, "Jenks we will give you Scandricks money or you can take that 40 million offered with 22 million guaranteed to you by jacksonville and be their starting right side CB or you can just stay here as the #3 and take the 12 million guaranteed, I'm sure your ready to sign with us"

Yeah right
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #72
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer View Post
Not to be picky, but can i get some sort of link for where you are finding these figures?
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-co...ndo-scandrick/

then go to the nfl and read about how the signing bonus and restructure bonus is prorated so if you release a player the prorated money comes off the cap that year.
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #73
Cowboys&LakersFan
Banned
 
Joined:
Dec 2010
Posts:
14,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supercowboy8 View Post
why would he? I might not be his agent but its called common sense. Jerry goes, "Jenks we will give you Scandricks money or you can take that 40 million offered with 22 million guaranteed to you by jacksonville and be their starting right side CB or you can just stay here as the #3 and take the 12 million guaranteed, I'm sure your ready to sign with us"

Yeah right
Play on a good team and its not like he wouldn't play. Teams nowadays with it being a passing league are constantly running three wide out sets which obviously means you need to have three solid corner backs. Plus it's Rob's current system at times one of corners will play safety.
Cowboys&LakersFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #74
RoyTheHammer
Cab to Kinko's
 
RoyTheHammer's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Location:
State College, P
Posts:
11,262
Default

Quick FYI.. for those of you who enjoy vomiting:

Scandrick is counting 7.7 million against the cap this year, which is more than any other player on the roster not named Tony Romo, Demarcus Ware, Anthony Spencer, or Doug Free.

Unreal how we make such mind-numbing mistakes like this.
RoyTheHammer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012   #75
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys&LakersFan View Post
Play on a good team and its not like he wouldn't play. Teams nowadays with it being a passing league are constantly running three wide out sets which obviously means you need to have three solid corner backs. Plus it's Rob's current system at times one of corners will play safety.
ok and when we put three Cbs on the field now its Carr, Clai, and Scandrick. Jenkins is going to want to be a every down CB starter and paid like one. We wont have the money to franchise him. Also he held out this offseason for a new contract. jerry didn't budge one inch. Sorry dude but he is gone after this year.
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com