
|
10-10-2012
|
#106
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,256 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Numbers921
At the end of the year, Nate Livings and Mackenzy Bernadeau will still be bad players. Bookmark it.
|
I'd have to be interested in your opinion to bookmark it. No offense, but I'm not.
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#107
|
|
Cab to Kinko's
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Location: | State College, P |
Posts: | 11,281 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I'd have to be interested in your opinion to bookmark it. No offense, but I'm not.
|
How rude..
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#108
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
Yes, we're all a bunch of football laypeople who have no idea what's going on and demand instant gratification like a child would. We can't critique our team or our head coach for multiple embarrassing losses and performances over the years because we are all simply retarded children who have no football sense.
Not everyone wants instant results. We simply want results. At some point. Anything. But this team has been stuck in a coma for the past few years.
I see nothing different from Wade's regime. Eventually, this 'process' should give us promising results. But here we are, year 2.5 under Garrett still getting blown out at home in embarrassing fashion on national TV.
Where are the results? What are they?
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#109
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,256 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer
I would agree.. it'd be alot nicer to have a lifetime guarentee of a job without your boss expecting any tangible results.
No doubt.
|
LOL
Yeah, you expect results and I don't. Nice attempt at back to back insults but you swung at air.
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#110
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,256 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer
How rude..
|
He hasn't been rude all over the forum though right?
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#111
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2012 |
Posts: | 817 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I'd have to be interested in your opinion to bookmark it. No offense, but I'm not.
|
Touche. 
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#112
|
|
Cab to Kinko's
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Location: | State College, P |
Posts: | 11,281 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
Yes, we're all a bunch of football laypeople who have no idea what's going on and demand instant gratification like a child would. We can't critique our team or our head coach for multiple embarrassing losses and performances over the years because we are all simply retarded children who have no football sense.
Not everyone wants instant results. We simply want results. At some point. Anything. But this team has been stuck in a coma for the past few years.
I see nothing different. Eventually, a 'process' yields promising results.
Where are they? What are they?
|
Bingo. But some of us have been saying this for awhile now.. it simply doesn't get through to Hos that this isn't 2010 anymore and the word "immediate" doesn't apply to an NFL head coach in his third year.
These are the questions that i have yet to see answered though.
Have at it, Hos..
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#113
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2012 |
Posts: | 817 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
He hasn't been rude all over the forum though right?
|
This just in. Being rude is not lowering your expectations for the Cowboys to Bengals like standards.
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#114
|
|
Cab to Kinko's
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Location: | State College, P |
Posts: | 11,281 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
He hasn't been rude all over the forum though right?
|
You're a RKG.. you don't stoop to other people's levels.
JG would be disappointed right now.
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#115
|
|
Diamond surrounded by trash
Years Donated 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 32,047 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyTheHammer
How rude..
|
Actually I have never seen anyone insulted that nicely.
victory is ours
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#116
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2011 |
Posts: | 1,814 |
|
no one can sell you on a completely GUTLESS and INEPT robo-coach.
there were fire garrett websites before he even became head coach!!
it's amazing how people forget that quickly. It's like the amnesia hammer came down when he went a measly 5-3....mind you with a team that won the NFC east championship and first playoff game in 14 years, the season before.
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#117
|
|
Penguinite
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 16,304 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Numbers921
Who picked the two new free agents who can't play?
|
Nate Livings has been our highest rated OL.
Please just stop posting.
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#118
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 29,089 |
|
I think when you evaluate a head coach you have to ask yourself if he is getting the most from what he has.
Currently, he is not. End of story. Dallas has a QB and they have all the skill players any coach could ever want.
Find me a single OC who is currently employed who couldn't get results if they had all that AND a good OL.
Do the results match up to the pieces the team has on offense? Simple as that and the answer is, "They do not".
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#119
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 29,089 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell
Nate Livings has been our highest rated OL.
Please just stop posting.
|
What an accolade.
|
|
|
10-10-2012
|
#120
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2011 |
Posts: | 1,814 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoofbite
I think when you evaluate a head coach you have to ask yourself if he is getting the most from what he has.
Currently, he is not. End of story. Dallas has a QB and they have all the skill players any coach could ever want.
Find me a single OC who is currently employed who couldn't get results if they had all that AND a good OL.
Do the results match up to the pieces the team has on offense? Simple as that and the answer is, "They do not".
|
wait what do ya mean?...isn't a 30th ranked scoring offense getting the most from our offense? 
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.
|