Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2012   #16
rodd94
Senior Member
 
rodd94's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2008
Location:
Dudley England
Posts:
172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJJ View Post
Posts like this are ridiculous. You're not going to improve by trading away some of your best players and rolling the dice on draft picks that may never pan out. You keep the players that are helping you win games and dump the players on the OL that are helping you lose. The main issue with the Cowboys is a poor OL and an incompetent head coach who continues having the team spin it's wheels.

The better the coaching the more you get out of the players you have. The roster doesn't need to be revamped the team needs a solid head coach and a DC who's built some real good defenses on some winning teams. For the Cowboys to start making progress they need to fix the coaching and the OL.
On the first part, It seemed to work when Dallas traded Hershel Walker to the Vikings for a bunch of picks.

On the second part, I said this would be a problem in april and all i got was abuse with people saying as long as we've got Claibourne this team is set, as the offense is "the same as last years" and we're Superbowl bound.

Erm ....................................
TEST
rodd94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #17
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
US
Posts:
26,073
Default

After the season there will be a review and inventory. Problems are identified and solutions entertained. There will be no wholesale changes for this team. I look for pass rusher, S, and OL to be specifically addressed but things could change between now and then.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #18
Nunez21
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2008
Posts:
134
Default

I think its a great idea. But 1 guy at a time starting with Witten this offseason, but I'd hang on to Dez because he's only 23. Time to move on from the past and build up our front lines!
Nunez21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #19
KJJ
You Have an Axe to Grind
 
KJJ's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2009
Location:
Malibu Ca
Posts:
7,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodd94 View Post
On the first part, It seemed to work when Dallas traded Hershel Walker to the Vikings for a bunch of picks.

On the second part, I said this would be a problem in april and all i got was abuse with people saying as long as we've got Claibourne this team is set, as the offense is "the same as last years" and we're Superbowl bound.

Erm ....................................

They traded one player not their QB, OLB, TE and WR. The 89 Cowboys were virtually talentless so they gambled their best player because that team had holes everywhere. You could trade Romo, Ware, Witten and Dez and never get the number of draft picks and players the 89 Cowboys got for Walker.

The Cowboys received 8 draft picks and 5 veteran players for Walker. Romo, Ware, Witten and Dez are the teams corp players and without them the Cowboys are probably a 3-4 win team at best. The picks they would get for them would be used to try and replace them it would make no sense. The Cowboys would probably end up having to use multiple picks just trying to replace Romo.

If you're referring to the OL don't know why you got abused for saying it would be a problem in 2012 most on the board figured it would be. A lot of fans wanted the Cowboys to use their #1 on the OL.
KJJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #20
rodd94
Senior Member
 
rodd94's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2008
Location:
Dudley England
Posts:
172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJJ View Post
They traded one player not their QB, OLB, TE and WR. The 89 Cowboys were virtually talentless so they gambled their best player because that team had holes everywhere. You could trade Romo, Ware, Witten and Dez and never get the number of draft picks and players the 89 Cowboys got for Walker.

The Cowboys received 8 draft picks and 5 veteran players for Walker. Romo, Ware, Witten and Dez are the teams corp players and without them the Cowboys are probably a 3-4 win team at best. The picks they would get for them would be used to try and replace them it would make no sense. The Cowboys would probably end up having to use multiple picks just trying to replace Romo.

If you're referring to the OL don't know why you got abused for saying it would be a problem in 2012 most on the board figured it would be. A lot of fans wanted the Cowboys to use their #1 on the OL.
I said taking Claibourne and losing our 2nd round pick was a mistake as the O-line needed help and the player brought in were career back ups. For this i got abuse off lots of poster who are now saying what i said back in April. Now i'm not slating Claiborne and never did i was saying giving up a 1st & 2nd for a player was too much and spending over $100m on CB and a few dimes on the o-line was a mistake. For this i was slated.
TEST
rodd94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #21
Fletch
To The Moon
 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Location:
Blairsville, PA
Posts:
8,574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys&LakersFan View Post
Way too early for this. Season is nowhere near being over. Revisit this in the offseason.
Yep. 1/4 of the season is thru and people are jumping ship. Bandwagoneers?


DESTINATION... END ZONE!!!
Fletch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #22
justbob
The Peacemaker
 
justbob's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Two feet over
Posts:
5,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
Yep. 1/4 of the season is thru and people are jumping ship. Bandwagoneers?
Bandwagoneers? ---does not google


You Young-uns Stay Out of Cbz's Yard --
Still miss you Pops
justbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #23
Falcon554
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
Yep. 1/4 of the season is thru and people are jumping ship. Bandwagoneers?
how in the heck can you bandwagon a 8-8 team?
Falcon554 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #24
maxdallasfan
Senior Member
 
maxdallasfan's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Oct 2009
Location:
Quakertown, PA
Posts:
380
Default

The only thing I would trade any of them for are 4 starting quality OL
maxdallasfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012   #25
lqmac1
Senior Member
 
lqmac1's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Location:
Tarheel Nation
Posts:
841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMERICAS_FAN View Post
Ahhh, no. Let's not slam te window shut prematurely.

Remebmer, this is year 2 of a 3-year rebuilding process.

You're asking if we should be tearing the whole thing down before seeing the full plan through.

How about we give it at least another offseason to get the rest of the pieces in place before we judge how Super Bowl ready this team is.

We've been rebuilding since 95!
TORCH HAS BEEN PASSED!!! 88
lqmac1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012   #26
lqmac1
Senior Member
 
lqmac1's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Location:
Tarheel Nation
Posts:
841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJJ View Post
They traded one player not their QB, OLB, TE and WR. The 89 Cowboys were virtually talentless so they gambled their best player because that team had holes everywhere. You could trade Romo, Ware, Witten and Dez and never get the number of draft picks and players the 89 Cowboys got for Walker.

The Cowboys received 8 draft picks and 5 veteran players for Walker. Romo, Ware, Witten and Dez are the teams corp players and without them the Cowboys are probably a 3-4 win team at best. The picks they would get for them would be used to try and replace them it would make no sense. The Cowboys would probably end up having to use multiple picks just trying to replace Romo.

If you're referring to the OL don't know why you got abused for saying it would be a problem in 2012 most on the board figured it would be. A lot of fans wanted the Cowboys to use their #1 on the OL.
Dude, that's the whole point of rebuilding. I never said the players we would draft would come in and win a super bowl that year. Withing 3-5 years I believe we would be in good position with a bunch of young talent mainly from the many picks we get. 1 playoff win since 96... remember that. Romo has all the stats and none of the wins. I was romo's biggest supporter 'till last week, that was the straw. I'm actually playing Flacco and Big Ben in both of my fantasy leagues over Romo.
TORCH HAS BEEN PASSED!!! 88
lqmac1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012   #27
AMERICAS_FAN
Senior Member
 
AMERICAS_FAN's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lqmac1 View Post
We've been rebuilding since 95!
Really? Didn't know it was 1995 when Garrett took over for Wade Phillips. Thanks for pointing out the facts.
___Americas Fan___
=================
_ AMERICAS_TEAM _
=================

Trent Dilfer: "Tony [Romo] has greatness in him. I think when you talk to other people that really play the quarterback position, there's a few guys that really have incredible greatness in them, and Tony is one of them. I think the issue here is he needs more help from his teammates. I think they are not nearly as talented as people say they are, from 1 to 53. I'm talking about the total roster.”

Last edited by AMERICAS_FAN : 10-11-2012 at 12:35 PM.
AMERICAS_FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012   #28
jazzcat22
Senior Member
 
jazzcat22's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Euless, TX
Posts:
6,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bark View Post
what would this team look like with another good free agent class and another good draft?
let's ride this romo and garrett train a coupla more yrs

I agree, this is year 2 of 3 in the rebuilding. Next year in FA & draft, it's OL & S.
That gives the win now team, but yet builds for long term future too.

Trade any one away, that's a give up. Too early in year to give up.
Ride it out.
jazzcat22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012   #29
DezBRomo9
Formerly joshjwc9
 
DezBRomo9's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Palm Harbor, FL
Posts:
1,499
Default

Honestly, this team is good enough. But I've been converted to blaming it on the Oline. I'd be up for trading Witten and Jenkins or Scandrick. Pick up some 2nd or 3rd rounders and reload the Oline with those picks. I believe the team is strong enough to pick up some FA's along the Dline and replace the two players we trade. I really think with selecting a guy like Barrett Jones or Chance Warmack along with a NT like Jesse Williams this team could see some dominate play from the trenches.
DezBRomo9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012   #30
lqmac1
Senior Member
 
lqmac1's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Location:
Tarheel Nation
Posts:
841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMERICAS_FAN View Post
Really? Didn't know it was 1995 when Garrett took over for Wade Phillips. Thanks for pointing out the facts.
So what kinda years were the one's in between 95-2010? As an organization we have been rebuilding, getting new coaches is a part of that process. AND how are you gonna rebuild when we never had anything good that collapsed? Like I said we've been rebuilding since 96.... Beat it!
TORCH HAS BEEN PASSED!!! 88
lqmac1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com