Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > News Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2012   #1
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,354
Default Breaking Down the ‘Boys: The real reason for the Cowboys’ offensive struggles

The league’s best offensive coordinators work like magicians, using sleight of hand to perpetually confuse defenses. They pass when the defense expects a run, and vice versa. To do that, coordinators must sometimes utilize “sub-optimal” personnel in order to trick the defense. Passing the ball from tight end-heavy, run-oriented formations isn’t inherently advantageous, for example, but it often works because it surprises defenders.

I think Jason Garrett has improved in some areas as a coordinator, but utilizing the element of surprise isn’t one of them. Garrett preaches execution from his players, frequently using his bigger personnel packages to run the ball and the smaller ones to throw it.

The problem is that the Cowboys aren’t the only team on the field. In theory, the offense is at their “best” when passing with four or five receivers on the field, for example, but defenses compensate for various personnel packages, negating any advantage the offense might have owned. Thus, it’s sometimes in the Cowboys’ best interest to pass with no more than two receivers on the field (or, on the flip side, run from pass-oriented packages).

Don’t believe me? Below, I’ve listed the Cowboys’ passing stats that I’ve collected thus far in 2012, broken down by personnel. As a quick refresher, the first number in the personnel package indicates the number of running backs on the field and the second is the number of tight ends. Thus, “22” personnel is two running backs, two tight ends, and a wide receiver, “11” personnel is one running back, one tight end, and three receivers, and so on.

22 – 4 for 5 for 59 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT — 115.8 rating — 11.8 YPA
12 – 8 for 12 for 136 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT – 97.9 rating — 11.3 YPA
21 – 14 for 20 for 199 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT — 114.4 rating — 10.0 YPA
11 – 77 for 110 787 yards, 3 TD, 4 INT — 84.2 rating — 7.2 YPA
10 – 3 for 9 for 33 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT — 5.6 rating — 3.7 YPA

http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/20...truggles.html/
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 10-12-2012   #2
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,354
Default

Well written, reasoned, and on the money.
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #3
FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
 
FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Nowhereland
Posts:
13,844
Default

He gives up on the run because we cannot run the ball? I don't need to count buckets and have excel graphs for know that.

Sleight of hand when Cook and Bernadeau cannot block a weak breeze...

http://sturminator.blogspot.com/2012...down-tfls.html
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins

Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
FuzzyLumpkins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #4
Diogenes
Senior Member
 
Diogenes's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2012
Posts:
1,179
Default

It's stunning to read so many opinions from fans who think we should go 4 and 5 wide a lot more. The only thing I can think of is they want to see Orton play a lot sooner.
Diogenes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #5
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
It's stunning to read so many opinions from fans who think we should go 4 and 5 wide a lot more. The only thing I can think of is they want to see Orton play a lot sooner.
Agreed.

Teams who go 4 and 5 wide have to in order to make mismatches to get guys open. With the weapons we have, we should be going max protect and letting Dez, Miles, and I'd still argue Felix, make plays.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #6
Aven8
Senior Member
 
Aven8's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2008
Posts:
3,240
Default

Been griping about this this for 6 years with Garrett. We are too predictable. In fact wasn't it Baltimore in the last game at Tx stadium, all the players were saying this. It's been how many years and Garrett isn't learning?

No this isn't a bash on the HC, it's one on the OC. He's lousy at it.
Aven8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #7
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aven8 View Post
Been griping about this this for 6 years with Garrett. We are too predictable. In fact wasn't it Baltimore in the last game at Tx stadium, all the players were saying this. It's been how many years and Garrett isn't learning?

No this isn't a bash on the HC, it's one on the OC. He's lousy at it.
I'm pretty sure that Philly said they knew ALL of our hots after the '08 week 17 win-and-in game that we got blown out in.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #8
Diogenes
Senior Member
 
Diogenes's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2012
Posts:
1,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Future View Post
Agreed.

Teams who go 4 and 5 wide have to in order to make mismatches to get guys open. With the weapons we have, we should be going max protect and letting Dez, Miles, and I'd still argue Felix, make plays.

Not to mention it's a good way to get your QB killed. Especially this team which has enough problems getting it done while in max protect.
Diogenes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #9
Aven8
Senior Member
 
Aven8's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2008
Posts:
3,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Future View Post
I'm pretty sure that Philly said they knew ALL of our hots after the '08 week 17 win-and-in game that we got blown out in.
You are correct. And because Romo is superman half the time he hides a lot of the flaws in the OC. We look like we are a great offense, stats wise, but any casual fan should know its a mirage. We are a mess and have been for years!
Aven8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #10
Sarge
94
 
Sarge's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Utica, N.Y.
Posts:
18,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aven8 View Post
Been griping about this this for 6 years with Garrett. We are too predictable. In fact wasn't it Baltimore in the last game at Tx stadium, all the players were saying this. It's been how many years and Garrett isn't learning?

No this isn't a bash on the HC, it's one on the OC. He's lousy at it.
Multiple teams have said this over different years.

There is no formula for success except an unconditional acceptance of life and what it brings.
Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012   #11
FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
 
FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Nowhereland
Posts:
13,844
Default

How many people have you guys seen in the game threads be able to accurately predict what play is going to be called? i am not talking run/pass. I am talking route combinations/protections/ running plays etc.

I see a lot of people claim that they can predict what is going to be run but i have yet to see anyone put their money where their mouth is and pull it off.
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins

Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
FuzzyLumpkins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012   #12
AZBOYZFAN
Senior Member
 
AZBOYZFAN's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aven8 View Post
Been griping about this this for 6 years with Garrett. We are too predictable. In fact wasn't it Baltimore in the last game at Tx stadium, all the players were saying this. It's been how many years and Garrett isn't learning?

No this isn't a bash on the HC, it's one on the OC. He's lousy at it.
Ya cause Romo never changes any of the plays that Garrett gives him. O in fact hasn't Callahan said for Romo NOT to change the play sooo many times? I thought so
AZBOYZFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012   #13
Hoofbite
Senior Member
 
Hoofbite's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
29,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins View Post
How many people have you guys seen in the game threads be able to accurately predict what play is going to be called? i am not talking run/pass. I am talking route combinations/protections/ running plays etc.

I see a lot of people claim that they can predict what is going to be run but i have yet to see anyone put their money where their mouth is and pull it off.
That's a pretty high standard.

No to mention whether or not we as fans can do it even if we had all the information available to the team, let alone the broadcast cam, is pretty irrelevant.

If fans can pretty much guess a run or a pass on any given down it's not some large leap of faith to think that opposing players and coaches go a few steps beyond that.
Hoofbite is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012   #14
Wolfpack
Senior Member
 
Wolfpack's Avatar
Years Donated
2008
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Beaufort, SC
Posts:
2,238
Default

Red has had alot of tells in his formations and personal packs over the years. It's been a weakness that he really hasn't fully solved.

Some self scouting should show that.
Wolfpack is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012   #15
ChldsPlay
Senior Member
 
ChldsPlay's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
5,189
Default

This has been obvious for a long time. I'm anxiously awaiting the next jumbo package attempt that will inevitably gets stuffed up the middle, killing another scoring opportunity.
ChldsPlay is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com