
|
11-13-2012
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101
The play in the video is wide open to convert the 1st down it comes down to making the play. It is great that fans would call a different play but in the end any play you call has to be executed.
|
It's true. I usually don't harp on Garrett for his playcalling, because it's pretty difficult to understand what's going on, and it's ridiculously easy (read: lazy) to say what would've worked better in hindsight.
I would like to know, however, why Garrett continues to plug stupid players into an offense that requires smart ones. Why'd we get rid of the guys who could adjust and run the right routes? And go with a group of mental midgets instead? Is Jerry making these personnel decisions? If yes, why does Garrett allow that?
This offense clearly requires players who are smart and can think on their feet. Why doesn't he surround his QB with players like that?
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Posts: | 2,191 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
I love seeing stuff like this. Much needed perspective for my daily Garrett-hating.
Real info.
I'd love to see what this offense would be capable of with Austin, and two other WR who know what they're doing. Why'd we get rid of Crayton? Robinson? Two WR who were productive here because they were smart. Bryant and Ogletree must severely handicap what we want to do. Romo missing easy passes doesn't help either. His accuracy has been pretty spotty this year.
Wonder if Garrett's offense would be better w/ a more accurate passer and at least one more capable receiver?
|
where is crayton these days? just because he was a decent 3rd WR long ago, doesn't make him so today.
Robinson took the money. Jerry wasn't willing to pay him the kind of money he was looking for.
and its funny to read the garrett hating, yet people complain about the players. is it garrett? or the players?
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Posts: | 2,191 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
It's true. I usually don't harp on Garrett for his playcalling, because it's pretty difficult to understand what's going on, and it's ridiculously easy (read: lazy) to say what would've worked better in hindsight.
I would like to know, however, why Garrett continues to plug stupid players into an offense that requires smart ones. Why'd we get rid of the guys who could adjust and run the right routes? And go with a group of mental midgets instead? Is Jerry making these personnel decisions? If yes, why does Garrett allow that?
This offense clearly requires players who are smart and can think on their feet. Why doesn't he surround his QB with players like that?
|
where do you get smarter players? he is playing the hand he is dealt.
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboysFaninDC
where do you get smarter players? he is playing the hand he is dealt.
|
We had smarter players. Your post above mentioned Crayton and where is he today? Who cares? While he was here, he was good. And extremely useful when the opponent blitzed.
Robinson, likewise, gave us speed and dependability. And production!
We've had these guys and let them go. Yeah Robinson wanted starters money. But if this offense's success absolutely depends on their WRs, why in the hell did we go with Bryant and Ogletree (knowing full well that these guys take the short bus)
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2004 |
Posts: | 10,809 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
We had smarter players. Your post above mentioned Crayton and where is he today? Who cares? While he was here, he was good. And extremely useful when the opponent blitzed.
Robinson, likewise, gave us speed and dependability. And production!
We've had these guys and let them go. Yeah Robinson wanted starters money. But if this offense's success absolutely depends on their WRs, why in the hell did we go with Bryant and Ogletree (knowing full well that these guys take the short bus)
|
Jerry should have absolutely found a way to keep Robinson. Ogletree should have been hitting the bricks.
We tell the team we have to move on from success" JG Oh how they have done that.
I know that when we do not have the kind of success, when we don't have expectations lived up to, the one that should get the most heat is the one that ultimately makes the decisions, period, with the Dallas Cowboys. And that's me."
Jurrha "Smack" Jones
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#21
|
|
The Instant Classic
Years Donated 2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Moar leadership! |
Posts: | 20,385 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101
You can go on and on about playcall but it comes down to execution. The play in the video is wide open to convert the 1st down it comes down to making the play. It is great that fans would call a different play but in the end any play you call has to be executed.
|
This is exactly right. There are two open players on that particular play who were open and behind the sticks. This isn't an example of players being dumb, and it's not an example of bad play calling.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, Texas |
Posts: | 70,341 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
It's true. I usually don't harp on Garrett for his playcalling, because it's pretty difficult to understand what's going on, and it's ridiculously easy (read: lazy) to say what would've worked better in hindsight.
I would like to know, however, why Garrett continues to plug stupid players into an offense that requires smart ones. Why'd we get rid of the guys who could adjust and run the right routes? And go with a group of mental midgets instead? Is Jerry making these personnel decisions? If yes, why does Garrett allow that?
This offense clearly requires players who are smart and can think on their feet. Why doesn't he surround his QB with players like that?
|
I think it is bit more than that, it is not that they don't know the rout often they fail to make the proper adjustment on the sight routs and being on the same page as Romo based on the defensive coverage they face when they get up to the line. I also do not think jerry is doing anything but paying the damn bills. This crap of blaming Jerry give me a break Jason want to call the plays he calls the plays Jerry is not making him do anything Jerry is giving Garrett the room to do the job. If Garrett fails then it is on Garrett
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit
This is exactly right. There are two open players on that particular play who were open and behind the sticks. This isn't an example of players being dumb, and it's not an example of bad play calling.
|
I was just generally speaking, not regarding this play in particular
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, Texas |
Posts: | 70,341 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit
This is exactly right. There are two open players on that particular play who were open and behind the sticks. This isn't an example of players being dumb, and it's not an example of bad play calling.
|
Exactly, on the play Romo kills the run play goes to the pass. The play works if you execute it there are open targets on the play. Had we ran and got stuffed behind the line since NY was stacked inside that would have been the wrong move for Romo. The play was there for the taking but you have to execute the play. It is not that fricken hard to understand. However as soon as a play fails the same parrots holler oh it was poor play calling as if they had a clue
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,761 |
|
Y Duznt Teh Garetz Runn Therre!!1!
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,761 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by e41dalasfan
If it 2nd and 1 why not just run the ball?
|
Well, I don't know. If we burn them on a long pass play in that situation because the QB read the defense correctly, would you be asking why we didn't just run the ball on 2nd and 1?
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, Texas |
Posts: | 70,341 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
Well, I don't know. If we burn them on a long pass play in that situation because the QB read the defense correctly, would you be asking why we didn't just run the ball on 2nd and 1?
|
I actually like throwing the ball deep on 2nd and 1 it is like taking a free shot knowing you have a manageable 3rd down should you not connect on the deep ball.
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2008 |
Posts: | 271 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
I love seeing stuff like this. Much needed perspective for my daily Garrett-hating.
Real info.
I'd love to see what this offense would be capable of with Austin, and two other WR who know what they're doing. Why'd we get rid of Crayton? Robinson? Two WR who were productive here because they were smart. Bryant and Ogletree must severely handicap what we want to do. Romo missing easy passes doesn't help either. His accuracy has been pretty spotty this year.
Wonder if Garrett's offense would be better w/ a more accurate passer and at least one more capable receiver?
|
Crayton was an arrogant idiot that dropped the game winning touchdown pass against the Giants in the playoffs. He was wide the hell open, free, and if he simply caught it, the Cowboys would go up two scores in the 4th quarter. Thank god that trash is gone.
Fire Jason Garrett
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,761 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101
I actually like throwing the ball deep on 2nd and 1 it is like taking a free shot knowing you have a manageable 3rd down should you not connect on the deep ball.
|
I do too. 2nd and 1 is a great time to take a chance down the field.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
11-13-2012
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101
I actually like throwing the ball deep on 2nd and 1 it is like taking a free shot knowing you have a manageable 3rd down should you not connect on the deep ball.
|
I like it too. It's a great idea to take a shot when you've only a little to go on 3rd. This team can pick up short yardage 3rd downs pretty well--between Witten and Austin.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.
|