Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2012   #16
Yeagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yeagermeister's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
47,537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RXP View Post
There you go. He's a coverage magnet.

/sarcasm
Kind of like Brandon Noble but on offense and much smaller
RIP Weldon "Pops" Parkhill....I will miss you my friend
R.I.P. Renee I miss you sis
Yeagermeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #17
RXP
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeagermeister View Post
Kind of like Brandon Noble but on offense and much smaller
Exactly.
RXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #18
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeagermeister View Post
Even 15 yrs ago I don't play them for letting him go. We had better wrs on the roster. If Jacksonville hadn't be an expansion team who knows if he even gets picked up. They had the time to let him develop and it's great that he got himself healthy and turned in to a great player. At the time we just couldn't wait on him.
.
Good points

But they really didn't have to wait long
He had over 1200 yard receiving his second year and basically strung together 9-10 more years like that before he was done.

And we did have enough of a need at WR that we spent a 3rd rounder pick on Stephret Williiams 2 years after we let go of Smith--who then went on to about 5 Pro Bowls.

Classic rueage material....but as I said, old news.

The point of this thread was to give the Beasley Groupies something to get excited about.
DFWJC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #19
Yeagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yeagermeister's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
47,537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
Good points

But they really didn't have to wait long
He had over 1200 yard receiving his second year and basically strung together 9-10 more years like that before he was done.

And we did have enough of a need at WR that we spent a 3rd rounder pick on Stephret Williiams 2 years after we let go of Smith--who then went on to about 5 Pro Bowls.

Classic rueage material....but as I said, old news.

The point of this thread was to give the Beasley Groupies something to get excited about.
We'll have to agree to disagree on the rueage
RIP Weldon "Pops" Parkhill....I will miss you my friend
R.I.P. Renee I miss you sis
Yeagermeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #20
RW Hitman
Senior Member
 
RW Hitman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,356
Send a message via AIM to RW Hitman
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
I was here when Amendola was in camp. That is nothing like--not even remotely like--what has gone on with Beasley.

There were some who really liked Amendola (and many who didn't who now say they did ) he had his little group of groupies. But go back and look. I bet I way underestimated the number of threads that have been started on lil Beastly's behalf.

The WR that I rued letting go the most was Jimmy Smith. I think the crowd that liked him trumped the Amedola crowd. None trump what I've seen surround Beasley. It's been entertaining for sure.

Let's hope it works out.

BTW, there a lot of similarities between Welker, Amendola, and Beasley....like small size, good hands etc.

Of yeah, and Danny Amendola is a fraking giant compared to Cole. He's 4 inches taller! Nothing a like size wise.
[View Full Quote]
really?

Last edited by justbob : 11-16-2012 at 04:41 PM.
RW Hitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #21
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RW Hitman View Post
really?
I know. Brilliant deduction on my part....stating the obvious, I mean.
DFWJC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #22
RXP
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
BTW, there a lot of similarities between Welker, Amendola, and Beasley....like small size, good hands etc. And yes, I do think it is a little bit of a factor.
I hadn't really thought about it until you mentioned it. Don't really care really. I disagree, I don't think it is a factor. I like Beasley, but if Harris is better than Beasley, go for it. I just want the best guys to play. And Ogletree isn't it.

Last edited by justbob : 11-16-2012 at 04:54 PM.
RXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #23
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RXP View Post
I hadn't really thought about it until you mentioned it. Don't really care really. I disagree, I don't think it is a factor. I like Beasley, but if Harris is better than Beasley, go for it. I just want the best guys to play. And Ogletree isn't it.
That's cool. And I buy it.

The other stuff is just a statistical observation, and not one that would apply at all everyone. I certainly wouldn't say it applies to you in particular.
But I'd say the odds are about 1000-1 (or much longer) that somehow, someway, three players are all singled out at a position that their racial makeup is fairly rare. One player..slighlty rare. Two player, very rare. Three player all together..nearly impossible.
It really is no big deal though. Just an elephant in the room kind of thing.
DFWJC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #24
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,309
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyskid29 View Post
I think everyone is just tired of seeing Ogletree on the field. I certainly am.
I think the Cowboys are sick of seeing Ogletree on the field too... And that's what's partially driving this.
MichaelWinicki is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #25
RXP
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
That's cool. And I buy it.

The other stuff is just an observation, and not one would apply everyone. I cenrtainly wouldn't say it applies to anyone specifically.
But I'd say the odds are about 1000-1 (or less) that somehow, someway, three players are all singled out at a position that their racial makeup is fairly rare. One player..slighlty rare. Two player, very rare. Three player all together..nearly impossible.
It really is no big deal though. Just an elephant in the room kind of thing.
Fair enough
RXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #26
JohnsKey19
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
5,257
Default

He can be a good WR when we go 4 WR. They'll use him on those short crossing type patterns where his quickness makes it very difficult for one defender to cover.
JohnsKey19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #27
Denim Chicken
Senior Member
 
Denim Chicken's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2009
Location:
Chesapeake, VA
Posts:
1,023
Default

Beasley!! Beasley!! Beasley!!
"When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." ~Socrates
Denim Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #28
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,309
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnsKey19 View Post
He can be a good WR when we go 4 WR. They'll use him on those short crossing type patterns where his quickness makes it very difficult for one defender to cover.
I think you're going to see him more as the #3.
MichaelWinicki is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #29
ninja
Numbnuts
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Bel Air, MD
Posts:
4,603
Default

The times I saw Beasley out there last week, he was open. It is tough to cover him on those short routes. Beasley is dangerous for those in-and-out routes and shallow crossing patterns. Keep him away from high traffic areas because he will get decapitated. He plays smart though. Knows when to get down and avoid hits.

Need to see more of Beasley and Harris.
ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012   #30
Seven
Messenger to the football Gods
 
Seven's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
10,195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
Something to look forward to!

Jerry was on the radio earlier today and let it slip that Beasley may have a bigger role in the game plan. He did so in the context of what players have gone above and beyond expectations lately. He also gave kudos to McCray.

I can't recall a player that has done so little that has a larger group of followers....even after quiting the team. I bet there have been more than a dozen threads on his behalf already. Oops, make that one more.

But I will say, he's fun to watch and I do think the kid can get open in this league.

Maybe his reps are going up. I sure the flow of the game will dictate part of it.

[View Full Quote]
Harris is another route runner in a scheme with a less than perfect OL, that sucks for route running.

Dallas needs beasley.


FTR - Amendola had a rather large following. Same kind of receiver.
AS: Cowboys ice their own kicker in 19-13 OT loss

“That is one of the luxuries of my position as owner as well as the ultimate decision maker, general manager and president – I can do that and take the losses and come back for more,” Jones said.


God help us...............
Seven is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com