Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2012   #76
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
 
Alexander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
18,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazyking View Post
He would be wrong and lying to himself. Also, when has he EVER said that.. Even during the campo years I don't remember him saying that.

You don't go out and try to solve one need (the secondary) if you're rebuilding.
Correct.

Especially when you return a large part of the bottom of the roster. Our turnover was not significant.

We even intended to allow players like Ogletree to play the market and still brought them back and re-installed them back like they never left. Dockery was the same way.
Alexander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #77
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

I thought it was a 2 year job to get this team in contention if they made the right moves.

I don't think they did. Guard and corner were very deep in FA and the draft last year. Those should have been fixed last year. Guard certainly wasn't.

That would have freed up the team this year to potentially grab another pass rusher early in what could be a banner year. It also looks like a decent safety class which is also a need.

Center is the tricky one as there hasn't been great options the last two years.

I think it was Sturm that discussed it. These misses mean they have to keep investing to fill massive holes. They never really build any depth or address positions that have plagued the team for years (OL, S)
junk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #78
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
 
Alexander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
18,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk View Post
I think it was Sturm that discussed it. These misses mean they have to keep investing to fill massive holes. They never really build any depth or address positions that have plagued the team for years (OL, S)
There were still other holes that now they have no choice but to over-react to the misses that will get ignored.

Even if the offensive line is finally addressed ala the CB spot this year, there are still big issues at safety, center and defensive line.

Just get prepared for an offseason thinking Barry Church returning off of an Achilles injury is going to shore that spot up. The problem is, while he was showing promise, he was not a proven solution even when he was healthy. The same goes for Costa. Lissemore will be the revelation at end, Brent at nose tackle. None are sure things, but will be viewed that way.

Our "core" is getting to the point where it needs to be addressed, but I am sure the "window" will be another topic this offseason. Maybe this year it is closed.

The real problem for this organization is bad decision making coupled with poor self-evaluation.
Alexander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #79
Clove
Shrinkage
 
Clove's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
34,624
Default

We are not rebuilding - Jerry is going to keep adding parts until Tony is done stinking up the place. Then he will think he can find a QB by flipping through the undrafted free agent list, or try to draft some injury prone dude, or find a QB who's played Volleyball for 4 years and decided to come back and play football.

Jerry can't stand losing for a couple of years to position himself to get a Top QB. Rebuilding means losing fans = losing money.

As long as Jones has breath, he will never rebuild.
Clove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #80
Bluestang
Senior Member
 
Bluestang's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2009
Location:
Idaho
Posts:
4,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk View Post
I thought it was a 2 year job to get this team in contention if they made the right moves.

I don't think they did. Guard and corner were very deep in FA and the draft last year. Those should have been fixed last year. Guard certainly wasn't.

That would have freed up the team this year to potentially grab another pass rusher early in what could be a banner year. It also looks like a decent safety class which is also a need.

Center is the tricky one as there hasn't been great options the last two years.

I think it was Sturm that discussed it. These misses mean they have to keep investing to fill massive holes. They never really build any depth or address positions that have plagued the team for years (OL, S)
I thought the Claiborne deal was something that fell in their laps when St. Louis was looking to trade down on draft day.

If that doesn't happen, I think Zeitler would have been selected with the first pick after a trade down. I believe this based on an interview Stephen had with the Talkin' Cowboys crew.

I hope that OC is the top priority on the list for the upcoming offseason. Just like Parcells believed in having a good center on the OL is paramount, I also believe the same thing.

I would take a blue-chip OC over any blue-chip OG every day of the week.
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
Bluestang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #81
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexander View Post
There were still other holes that now they have no choice but to over-react to the misses that will get ignored.

Even if the offensive line is finally addressed ala the CB spot this year, there are still big issues at safety, center and defensive line.

Just get prepared for an offseason thinking Barry Church returning off of an Achilles injury is going to shore that spot up. The problem is, while he was showing promise, he was not a proven solution even when he was healthy. The same goes for Costa. Lissemore will be the revelation at end, Brent at nose tackle. None are sure things, but will be viewed that way.

Our "core" is getting to the point where it needs to be addressed, but I am sure the "window" will be another topic this offseason. Maybe this year it is closed.

The real problem for this organization is bad decision making coupled with poor self-evaluation.
These are the sorts of issues all organizations have. And, guess what: if we'd addressed everything, you're still going to have things like injuries and declining play hitting you upside the head where you don't expect it.

We've actually been ok this year when it comes to personnel depth. The big problems being multiple hits at positions like C and S and ILB and insufficient talent to run the offense the way we'd intended (missing a fit at WR and the issues at OT).

And, of course, because of these things, the issues with coughing up the ball that keep us from winning games against good teams.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #82
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexander View Post

The real problem for this organization is bad decision making coupled with poor self-evaluation.
Agreed. I think I'd also add lack of any sort of long term vision.

Everyone knows my dislike of the job Jerry has done here. Although he likes to spout off about how he listens to all these "advisers", I think it really handicaps him because he just listens to whoever has his ear. As a result, the team doesn't have any sort of long term plan for what kind of football team they want to be.

Someone else mentioned it on here, but they described as players that don't play well together......good collection of individual talent, but not a great team.
junk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #83
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestang View Post
I thought the Claiborne deal was something that fell in their laps when St. Louis was looking to trade down on draft day.

If that doesn't happen, I think Zeitler would have been selected with the first pick after a trade down. I believe this based on an interview Stephen had with the Talkin' Cowboys crew.

I hope that OC is the top priority on the list for the upcoming offseason. Just like Parcells believed in having a good center on the OL is paramount, I also believe the same thing.

I would take a blue-chip OC over any blue-chip OG every day of the week.
Center is a tough one. The only guy that might be considered blue chip this year is Barrett Jones.

I was for signing Koppen last year just for the veteran leadership. Look at Doug Free and Tyron Smith's best years......who was playing next to them? The team needs a vet presence on the line.
junk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #84
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
 
Alexander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
18,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk View Post
Agreed. I think I'd also add lack of any sort of long term vision.

Everyone knows my dislike of the job Jerry has done here. Although he likes to spout off about how he listens to all these "advisers", I think it really handicaps him because he just listens to whoever has his ear. As a result, the team doesn't have any sort of long term plan for what kind of football team they want to be.

Someone else mentioned it on here, but they described as players that don't play well together......good collection of individual talent, but not a great team.
If Jerry Jones is the true alpha male in the organization, which I believe he is, it is part of his job to make a great team.

There is a lot more that goes into that other than signing the checks.
Alexander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #85
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit View Post
These are the sorts of issues all organizations have. And, guess what: if we'd addressed everything, you're still going to have things like injuries and declining play hitting you upside the head where you don't expect it.

We've actually been ok this year when it comes to personnel depth. The big problems being multiple hits at positions like C and S and ILB and insufficient talent to run the offense the way we'd intended (missing a fit at WR and the issues at OT).

And, of course, because of these things, the issues with coughing up the ball that keep us from winning games against good teams.
I know it is really popular around to here to pretend that Dallas is just like every other franchise, but they aren't. I think their track record over the past 15 years or so is evidence enough of that.
junk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #86
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexander View Post
If Jerry Jones is the true alpha male in the organization, which I believe he is, it is part of his job to make a great team.

There is a lot more that goes into that other than signing the checks.
Jerry wants the credit for building a football team and being a football guy. He gets the blame when he fails. He's failed for quite some time now.

A good GM is working all day, every day to evaluate players, work with his staff, etc. I actually don't Jerry being a meddler is his issue. It is that he is only a part time GM and he listens to way too many people.
junk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #87
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk View Post
I know it is really popular around to here to pretend that Dallas is just like every other franchise, but they aren't. I think their track record over the past 15 years or so is evidence enough of that.
That's popular? I hadn't noticed.

What I have seen as popular is people pretending that, because some things are wrong in Dallas, everything is wrong in Dallas.

Like it or not, our personell has not been a huge problem, other than having to work around some very specific injuries. We've got a moderately-talented club right now.

And that's not me making an excuse, it's me taking the personnel excuse off the board. That should make you happy instead of sad.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #88
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit View Post
That's popular? I hadn't noticed.

What I have seen as popular is people pretending that, because some things are wrong in Dallas, everything is wrong in Dallas.

Like it or not, our personell has not been a huge problem, other than having to work around some very specific injuries. We've got a moderately-talented club right now.

And that's not me making an excuse, it's me taking the personnel excuse off the board. That should make you happy instead of sad.
So you think it is all injuries? Or coaching?
junk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #89
Zordon
Senior Member
 
Zordon's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
Austin via Big D
Posts:
4,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestang View Post
I thought the Claiborne deal was something that fell in their laps when St. Louis was looking to trade down on draft day.

If that doesn't happen, I think Zeitler would have been selected with the first pick after a trade down. I believe this based on an interview Stephen had with the Talkin' Cowboys crew.

I hope that OC is the top priority on the list for the upcoming offseason. Just like Parcells believed in having a good center on the OL is paramount, I also believe the same thing.

I would take a blue-chip OC over any blue-chip OG every day of the week.
why do you have to tease me?

Zordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #90
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk View Post
So you think it is all injuries? Or coaching?
It's turnovers. That's part coaching. Part players (WRs, in particular, but also the QB and the protection). It's also the S's not getting the takeaways we need. I think the injuries at OLB are really going to end up hurting us. We've also been largely unable to blitz as a by product of compromised coverage which has probably hurt our defensive takeaways.

But the personnel problems have been more or less isolated to WRs and OTs and S. And then depth at OC and ILB. Given the extent of the damage at those spots, though, the 3rd and 4th string backups have actually played ok. It's just not reasonable to expect us to go 3 and 4-deep at those positions.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com