Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2012   #1
CowboyChris
Senior Member
 
CowboyChris's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Corpus Christi
Posts:
2,630
Send a message via AIM to CowboyChris Send a message via Yahoo to CowboyChris
Default What does everyone think of Livings at LG?

what does everyone think of Livings at LG? good or bad signing?
CowboyChris is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2012   #2
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,175
Default

Solid. I like the move.

I'm sure as soon as we get the rest of the oline squared away he'll be the next guy to start playing terrible though.
CATCH17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #3
fortdick
Senior Member
 
fortdick's Avatar
Years Donated
2006, 2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
5,338
Default

It is an upgrade, but barely. He is probably the best Oline we have had all year. Too bad Tyron has struggled.

I think we should make a run at Jake Long.

fortdick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #4
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,425
Default

I think a team could win with the OG play we're getting right now. I don't like the backup options other than Kowalski, though.

Mack started really slowly, but his play has leveled off as he's gotten back into football shape and logged some starts.

What's interesting to me is that, in only a few games, Parnell has looked roughly as good as Smith has. And that's not solely a compliment to Parnell. Smith's slumped in this sophomore year, and Parnell looks like he should be elevated to RT as soon as Smith gets back in the lineup. Or maybe we try Smith at RT and leave Parnell where he's at.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #5
theebs
Believe!!!!
 
theebs's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2010
 
Joined:
Feb 2006
Location:
Cookies?
Posts:
20,488
Default

Unlike some others on this Team he is playing hurt.

He has had a significant knee injury he has played through without whining about it.

If only he could teach Jenkins and Felix about this.
theebs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #6
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Decent enough but I'd still very much like to improve on that position if we can.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #7
JohnsKey19
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
5,250
Default

Livings has been a solid starter. For the money, decent signing.

Bernadeau has been up/down and would've been ideal as a good versatile backup, not as a starter. Still, for the money, not a bad signing. Whether he's solid/good starter is another question.

Looking forward to next season, we must seriously upgrade 1 interior OL spot and also replace Free at RT. Realistically 2 new starters on the OL is probably all we're going to see. I really like Parnell if he has the entire offseason to practice at RT. We'll probably be drafting in the teens so it's highly unlikely an OG or OC is selected there. Perhaps we grab one in the 2nd round.

On another note, i've been watching Parnell and he may be the best run blocker we have. Hopefully coachscout chimes in at some point with player evaluations. But this guy mauls people.
JohnsKey19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #8
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
Solid. I like the move.

I'm sure as soon as we get the rest of the oline squared away he'll be the next guy to start playing terrible though.
It'll be more like his warts will show. On a good line, everybody would be looking to replace him.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #9
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit View Post
I think a team could win with the OG play we're getting right now.
Wow. I'm literally at a loss for words over that statement.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #10
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit View Post
I think a team could win with the OG play we're getting right now. I don't like the backup options other than Kowalski, though.

Mack started really slowly, but his play has leveled off as he's gotten back into football shape and logged some starts.

What's interesting to me is that, in only a few games, Parnell has looked roughly as good as Smith has. And that's not solely a compliment to Parnell. Smith's slumped in this sophomore year, and Parnell looks like he should be elevated to RT as soon as Smith gets back in the lineup. Or maybe we try Smith at RT and leave Parnell where he's at.
You have some good points on Parnell.

Livings has not been better than Holland would have been. He is a low-tier free agent.that has been a problem in a problem area. He should be easy to upgrade.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #11
Section444
Senior Member
 
Section444's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
Frisco, TX
Posts:
2,519
Default

He's a good (not great) filler until we find the long-term answer. I don't think that he has much of a future with the team beyond a couple of years.

Section444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #12
Shinywalrus
Senior Member
 
Shinywalrus's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2012
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
1,737
Default

Better than I expected, to be honest. JAG, but that's better than our situation at C or RG.
Shinywalrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #13
dexternjack
Senior Member
 
dexternjack's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2010
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
Posts:
2,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
Decent enough but I'd still very much like to improve on that position if we can.
It is going to be hard enough to upgrade 4 positions as it is on the O-line. I think he is fine there, keep Smith at LT (unless a stud LT in the draft and move Smith to RT), let Costa hold center and the scouts focus on RG and RT.

This team still needs to work on the defensive line too., not to mention a safety.

Just saying there are too many needs to change up 4 guys on one side of the ball, Livings, Costa and Smith should stay put. If there is money left, then maybe try and upgrade center, but it is not a necessity IMO.
Everyone has a plan, until they get hit.
/ Mike Tyson
dexternjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #14
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dexternjack View Post
It is going to be hard enough to upgrade 4 positions as it is on the O-line. I think he is fine there, keep Smith at LT (unless a stud LT in the draft and move Smith to RT), let Costa hold center and the scouts focus on RG and RT.

This team still needs to work on the defensive line too., not to mention a safety.

Just saying there are too many needs to change up 4 guys on one side of the ball, Livings, Costa and Smith should stay put. If there is money left, then maybe try and upgrade center, but it is not a necessity IMO.
True, but ignored by most. This team has alot of needs, and while we should concentrate on upgrading the OL in free agency, it wouldn't be smart at all to go into the draft with an OL or bust mentality.

Hopefully we can address some needs in free agency so we can get the BPA in the draft.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #15
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep_Freeze View Post
True, but ignored by most. This team has alot of needs, and while we should concentrate on upgrading the OL in free agency, it wouldn't be smart at all to go into the draft with an OL or bust mentality.

Hopefully we can address some needs in free agency so we can get the BPA in the draft.
You have no worry. Jerry is not going to spend quality draft picks on the line anyway. He could use one second or third round pick every year and keep a young quality line on the field. First round picks are not needed.
I disagree with building the line with free agents. They are too expensive and the quality is not there unless the team overpays. This last draft was an excellent time to fix many of the problems on the line, but the team decided to trade up and burn picks which made this draft a one starter draft.

The oline is the biggest positional unit on either side of the ball and draft picks should be used accordingly. The line are the only positions that has a direct impact on QB,RB and WR positions and good line play even keeps the defense fresh. They are worth the investment to a real football GM.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com