Jason Garrett must let talent flow

[felix360]

Jason Garrett must let talent flow

Jean-Jacques Taylor [ARCHIVE] ESPNDallas.com | December 4, 2012

IRVING, Texas -- Philosophically, Jason Garrett believes the more players a defense has to stop, the better, because it allows his offense to attack favorable matchups. Read more at link. http://m.espn.go.com/wireless/story?...34&city=dallas

[Idgit]

Another awful article, full of misunderstandings and inaccuracies.

[visionary]

Originally Posted by Idgit

Another awful article, full of misunderstandings and inaccuracies.

those idiot beat writers and 'haters in the media', NFL commentators, so called experts, people who have been in actual NFL front offices, former coaches and players

being critical of RJ again

clearly ignorant of the basics of football

ever thought of sending your extensive football resume to the media outlets so you can shine the light, show them the true path?

[Dhragon]

All Garrett supporters will think this article is trash, all Garrett haters will think it's genius.

[Hoofbite]

JJT's an idiot.

Could barely read the thing but saw the part about Beasley should never be targeted "X" amount of times because he's not dynamic enough to make the most of those opportunities?

You don't put quotas on targets. If it works out that Beasley has 10 or 15, that's how it works out. What do you do, throw to someone who isn't open when Beasley is?

The only time I would ever do something along the lines of putting a quota on a target is right along the lines with what Collinsworth said the other night.

At least a coule of times per game just throw it up deep to Dez and let him go after it.

[Hoofbite]

Originally Posted by Dhragon

All Garrett supporters will think this article is trash, all Garrett haters will think it's genius.

I'm critical of the Garrett. Article sucks.

[Oh_Canada]

Originally Posted by Hoofbite

I'm critical of the Garrett. Article sucks.

Article is written like a ten year-old, but one thing is for certain, Dez does need to get the ball early.

[Zimmy Lives]

Originally Posted by Dhragon

All Garrett supporters will think this article is trash, all Garrett haters will think it's genius.

Come on, now! Gene Jock Tailor is not capable of writing anything that would remotely be considered "genius."

[visionary]

Originally Posted by Zimmy Lives

Come on, now! Gene Jock Tailor is not capable of writing anything that would remotely be considered "genius."

you dont have to be a genius to see the warts on this team

GM
HC
OC

[Chocolate Lab]

JJT is a terrible writer, but he's right here in that you have to get the ball in the hands of your best players. You can't always just take what the defense gives because they're always going to give you Cole Beasley and not Dez Bryant.

Sometimes on offense you have to find a way to take what you want.

[Zimmy Lives]

Originally Posted by visionary

you dont have to be a genius to see the warts on this team

GM
HC
OC

Then it would be obvious to even the most obtuse of us, like me!

No genius here. Move along... .

[Idgit]

Originally Posted by visionary

those idiot beat writers and 'haters in the media', NFL commentators, so called experts, people who have been in actual NFL front offices, former coaches and players

being critical of RJ again

clearly ignorant of the basics of football

ever thought of sending your extensive football resume to the media outlets so you can shine the light, show them the true path?

Whoah, there, slippery slope! Let me get my crimpons out. I said JJT wrote a horrible article. Because he's awful at his job, and because he wrote an entire article based on a premise that was exploded in a previous press conference when the head coach was asked about pass distribution directly.

And because the article contains stuff like this:

This team isn't good enough to let Bryant, one of its best offensive players, be a nonfactor for an entire half, but that's what occasionally happens in Garrett's offense because the ball is supposed to go wherever the coverage dictates it should go.

Whatever.

Sometimes, an offense needs to take what it wants -- not what the defense gives it.

in regards to a game we won, where the offense put up 31 points and moved the ball really well both on the ground and in the air.

He's also disregarding the fact that the offense makes a ton of adjustments in the game based on coverages to make sure it gets the matchups it wants, but that's because he fundamentally misunderstands how football works even after all these years 'covering' the team. But, hey, it sounds good to an untrained ear and agitates the masses.

I've got plenty of my own criticism of JG on record if anyone bothers to read it. I just make an effort, at least, to make sure that if I'm going to pick on a guy, I use a valid point of criticism.

[Zimmy Lives]

Originally Posted by Idgit

Whoah, there, slippery slope! Let me get my crimpons out. I said JJT wrote a horrible article. Because he's awful at his job, and because he wrote an entire article based on a premise that was exploded in a previous press conference when the head coach was asked about pass distribution directly.

And because the article contains stuff like this:



in regards to a game we won, where the offense put up 31 points and moved the ball really well both on the ground and in the air.

He's also disregarding the fact that the offense makes a ton of adjustments in the game based on coverages to make sure it gets the matchups it wants, but that's because he fundamentally misunderstands how football works even after all these years 'covering' the team. But, hey, it sounds good to an untrained ear and agitates the masses.

[View Full Quote]I've got plenty of my own criticism of JG on record if anyone bothers to read it. I just make an effort, at least, to make sure that if I'm going to pick on a guy, I use a valid point of criticism.

This.

Gene Jock Tailor displays shabby writing skills as it is but when he uses words like "ridiculous" and "whatever" he is the one who is ridiculous and his article is whatever.

[Double Trouble]

Originally Posted by Dhragon

All Garrett supporters will think this article is trash, all Garrett haters will think it's genius.

Garrett sucks. JJT sucks.

[Idgit]

Originally Posted by Double Trouble

Garrett sucks. JJT sucks.

There we go. Middle ground. Now everybody's happy, right?