Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Off-topic Zone
Reload this Page Star Trek Into Darkness

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 12-07-2012   #16
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,202
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam I Am View Post
Doesn't seem so.
of course someone who has never read Roddenberry's writings on this would think so.

IGNORANCE is bliss for those that don't bother to really look for the answers
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #17
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,202
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackat View Post
Please enlighten me. What is "my" definition of a punk? How does my definition compare to yours? Does your definition of punk include happiness? Just curious how you came to your conclusions based off of my response.
obviously you have never read Websters definition. I should say the non PC websters definition.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #18
Rackat
Senior Member
 
Rackat's Avatar
Years Donated
2009
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Ft. Worth
Posts:
2,119
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
obviously you have never read Websters definition. I should say the non PC websters definition.
I see. The modifying words "somewhat of a" before the word "punk" precludes a strict Merriam Websters Dictionary definition. I like Star Trek. It's one of my favorite SciFi series, but I admit, I have never read any of the novels. So, if you want to argue Roddenberry's writing of the original characters versus the reboot's new characters, I think I'll just pass.

1971--1977--1992--1993--1995--????
Rackat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #19
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,953
Default
One Kirk grew up with a father and the the other did not. That shaped the development of the character. The whole idea is there are supposed to be some differences and still some similarities between the two Kirks.
joseephuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #20
Phoenix
Senior Member
 
Phoenix's Avatar
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Aug 2008
Location:
Arlington, VA
Posts:
3,759
Default
Gary Mitchell would be cool. Q 2.
The liver is EVIL! It must be PUNISHED!
Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #21
Joe Rod
Do you like movies about Gladiators?
 
Joe Rod's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Somewhere Awesom
Posts:
7,533
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by joseephuss View Post
One Kirk grew up with a father and the the other did not. That shaped the development of the character. The whole idea is there are supposed to be some differences and still some similarities between the two Kirks.
Agree. I'll be watching it when it when it comes out.
Joe Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #22
cowboyeric8
Chicks dig crutches
 
cowboyeric8's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Location:
Texas
Posts:
5,127
Default
Jeez so much hostility in a thread about Star Trek
cowboyeric8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #23
Rackat
Senior Member
 
Rackat's Avatar
Years Donated
2009
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Ft. Worth
Posts:
2,119
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyeric8 View Post
Jeez so much hostility in a thread about Star Trek
Star Wars geeks are just as bad. And it gets really bitter when they argue which "universe" is better. I watch for the entertainment value. If it is entertaining, I watch it, if not, well I don't. Avatar got rave reviews a few years ago, I thought it was just a boring rendition of Dances with Wolves set on another planet. The new reboot of Star Trek, with one new movie out, has been enjoyable. I just don't see the point in argueing the merits of what Roddenberry intended versus a reboot by a different writer. You either like it or you don't, lol.

1971--1977--1992--1993--1995--????
Rackat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #24
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,953
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyeric8 View Post
Jeez so much hostility in a thread about Star Trek
That is what happens when you tick off nerds/geeks.
joseephuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #25
Joe Rod
Do you like movies about Gladiators?
 
Joe Rod's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Somewhere Awesom
Posts:
7,533
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyeric8 View Post
Jeez so much hostility in a thread about Star Trek
Some people take their Star Trek pretty serious.
Joe Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #26
cowboyeric8
Chicks dig crutches
 
cowboyeric8's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Location:
Texas
Posts:
5,127
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackat View Post
Star Wars geeks are just as bad. And it gets really bitter when they argue which "universe" is better. I watch for the entertainment value. If it is entertaining, I watch it, if not, well I don't. Avatar got rave reviews a few years ago, I thought it was just a boring rendition of Dances with Wolves set on another planet. The new reboot of Star Trek, with one new movie out, has been enjoyable. I just don't see the point in argueing the merits of what Roddenberry intended versus a reboot by a different writer. You either like it or you don't, lol.
Word for word what I think. I hated Avatar, but if someone else liked it more power to them. I've watched all the Star Trek's minus DS9 (because that show was boring), and for the most part enjoyed all the movies. I am in no way an expert, but I was entertained so I watch, and for a sci-fi movie to be more "real" is kind of weird thing to think about.
cowboyeric8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #27
ScipioCowboy
Convicted of Gnostical Turpitude
 
ScipioCowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jan 2007
Location:
Gatesville, Texa
Posts:
11,861
Default
People, people.

Star Trek isn't supposed to tear us apart. It's supposed to bring us together.

Personally, I liked the scene where the Enterprise destroys the Star Destroyer with one photon torpedo to the bridge, proving once and for all who is superior.
"Many of the greatest things man has achieved are not the result of consciously directed thought, and still less the product of a deliberately coordinated effort of many individuals, but of a process in which the individual plays a part which he can never fully understand." - Friedrich Hayek
ScipioCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #28
Trendnet
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Aug 2006
Posts:
696
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackat View Post
Star Wars geeks are just as bad. And it gets really bitter when they argue which "universe" is better. I watch for the entertainment value. If it is entertaining, I watch it, if not, well I don't. Avatar got rave reviews a few years ago, I thought it was just a boring rendition of Dances with Wolves set on another planet. The new reboot of Star Trek, with one new movie out, has been enjoyable. I just don't see the point in argueing the merits of what Roddenberry intended versus a reboot by a different writer. You either like it or you don't, lol.

Star Trek > Star Wars.

Yea,

I went there.
Trendnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #29
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,953
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackat View Post
Star Wars geeks are just as bad. And it gets really bitter when they argue which "universe" is better. .
It is the same universe.

Star Wars happened a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. In Episode I there is a scene in the senate where you see E.T.'s. In E.T., this race of E.T.'s is able to travel from their galaxy to the Milky Way galaxy and make it to Earth. In the future on Earth, eventually the stuff in Star Trek will occur. Hence, the same universe.
joseephuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012   #30
Denim Chicken
Senior Member
 
Denim Chicken's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2009
Location:
Chesapeake, VA
Posts:
1,017
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendnet View Post
Star Trek > Star Wars.

Yea,

I went there.
Star Trek Reboot > Star Wars EP I, II, & III

Star Wars EP IV, V, & VI > All Star Trek Movies & EPs
"When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." ~Socrates
Denim Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.

Home - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com