brockers pretty good game

[jblaze2004]

vs the bills, 1.5 sacks a force fumble and 7 tackles. Pretty good numbers. He has been pretty good.

[danielofthesaints]

I think you meant this for the NFL zone.

[supercowboy8]

Yes he played very well om a 4-3. Still don't believe he would make a good 3-4 DE

[burmafrd]

not worth a first rd pick so far

[Manwiththeplan]

Originally Posted by burmafrd

not worth a first rd pick so far

4 sacks through 13 games is actually pretty good for an interior lineman.

So using this logic, Warren Sapp wasn't worth a first rounder as a rookie.

And judging an interior guy on sacks alone, makes no sense.

[cowboysooner]

Brockers also missed the first 3 or 4 weeks with an ankle. Brockers would be in the top 10 in a redraft.

[Manwiththeplan]

maybe top 5. Better prospect than Hankins imo.

[Joshmil53]

He hasn't been impressive at all IMO. Definitely not top 5.

[Manwiththeplan]

Originally Posted by Joshmil53

He hasn't been impressive at all IMO. Definitely not top 5.

if hankins is being talked about going top 5, then there's no reason to say Brockers wouldn't have the same talk.

[tomson75]

Originally Posted by danielofthesaints

I think you meant this for the Ru3age zone.

FIFY..

[burmafrd]

Originally Posted by Manwiththeplan

4 sacks through 13 games is actually pretty good for an interior lineman.

So using this logic, Warren Sapp wasn't worth a first rounder as a rookie.

And judging an interior guy on sacks alone, makes no sense.

you are comparing him to Warren Sapp. You do know that.

its not just sacks. He has not done all that much else. But clearly you are just a homer on this guy so who cares?

[Manwiththeplan]

Originally Posted by burmafrd

you are comparing him to Warren Sapp. You do know that.

its not just sacks. He has not done all that much else. But clearly you are just a homer on this guy so who cares?

if what you got from my post was brockers = sapp, then you're clearly the one who's biased on the subject.

FWIW, I don't think it's a coincidence that St.Louis went from allowing 4.8 ypc and 152.1 ypg, to 4.0 ypc and 110.3 ypg.

Brockers isn't soley responsibile, but when you combine the improvement in the run game, and his success collapsing the pocket, there's really no argument to say he's still not worth a first round pick.

[DBOY3141]

Originally Posted by burmafrd

not worth a first rd pick so far

Then neither is Claiborne with his 1 interception.

Brockers is and will be a very good DL.

[Joshmil53]

Originally Posted by Manwiththeplan

if what you got from my post was brockers = sapp, then you're clearly the one who's biased on the subject.

FWIW, I don't think it's a coincidence that St.Louis went from allowing 4.8 ypc and 152.1 ypg, to 4.0 ypc and 110.3 ypg.

Brockers isn't soley responsibile, but when you combine the improvement in the run game, and his success collapsing the pocket, there's really no argument to say he's still not worth a first round pick.

Quinn is also turning into an elite DE and Lauranitis too. Jenkins and Finnegan help too.

[burmafrd]

Originally Posted by Manwiththeplan

if what you got from my post was brockers = sapp, then you're clearly the one who's biased on the subject.

FWIW, I don't think it's a coincidence that St.Louis went from allowing 4.8 ypc and 152.1 ypg, to 4.0 ypc and 110.3 ypg.

Brockers isn't soley responsibile, but when you combine the improvement in the run game, and his success collapsing the pocket, there's really no argument to say he's still not worth a first round pick.

depends on what you define as what is worth a first rd pick.

This guy is not a Seymour and that to me is the only one I would say is worth it