Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2012   #16
ringmaster
Senior Member
 
ringmaster's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
1,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocyaice View Post
I don't think it would matter. Tight ends, field goal kickers...its just not as attractive as the wide receiver, running back or quarterback position. Or even the sack record. Tight end will always be a afterthought. Or it may change with the way the tight end position is evolving.
Calvin Johnson's record of 1,892 yds and is one pace for a 2,000 yd season, or Adrian Peterson's attempt at Dickerson's record is more significant in alot of people's eyes.
ringmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012   #17
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ringmaster View Post
Calvin Johnson's record of 1,892 yds and is one pace for a 2,000 yd season, or Adrian Peterson's attempt at Dickerson's record is more significant in alot of people's eyes.
I would say Peterson breaking Dickerson record. Reason they have not changed rules to make it easier on RB.
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012   #18
ringmaster
Senior Member
 
ringmaster's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
1,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101 View Post
I would say Peterson breaking Dickerson record. Reason they have not changed rules to make it easier on RB.
I see what you're saying Dooms regarding the RB record it would be more impressive that's for sure.

As for Calvin Johnson, and yes I agree that the league has made it easier for WRs regarding the rules he is that once in a lifetime talent at WR, and imho is a bigger, faster version of Jerry Rice and while his team isn't as good his record of 1,892 yds and is only 108 yds shy of 2,000 yds is just as impressive.
ringmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012   #19
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ringmaster View Post
I see what you're saying Dooms regarding the RB record it would be more impressive that's for sure.

As for Calvin Johnson, and yes I agree that the league has made it easier for WRs regarding the rules he is that once in a lifetime talent at WR, and imho is a bigger, faster version of Jerry Rice and while his team isn't as good his record of 1,892 yds and is only 108 yds shy of 2,000 yds is just as impressive.
I agree it is impressive. I just think it is harder to accomplish what Peterson may end up doing. 1984 Dickerson put up 2,105 yards
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012   #20
ringmaster
Senior Member
 
ringmaster's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
1,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101 View Post
I agree it is impressive. I just think it is harder to accomplish what Peterson may end up doing. 1984 Dickerson put up 2,105 yards
I agree you won't hear any arguements from me on this one.

Do you see another WR breaking Johnson's record anytime soon?
ringmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012   #21
cowboyschmps3
Senior Member
 
cowboyschmps3's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2006
Location:
Pharr, Texas
Posts:
1,775
Send a message via MSN to cowboyschmps3 Send a message via Yahoo to cowboyschmps3
Default

It be all over sport networks and all big cause that certain tight end would be the best ever but since its witten they down play it
cowboyschmps3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012   #22
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ringmaster View Post
True Hos as I stated in a previous post that Gronk is the equivalent to Witten in terms of skill set.
I think Gronk is overall even more skilled that Witten.
But you must give credit to someone doing it over many years.
Witten has done that and more
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #23
ringmaster
Senior Member
 
ringmaster's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
1,621
Default

[quote=DFWJC;4923011]I think Gronk is overall even more skilled that Witten.
But you must give credit to someone doing it over many years.
Witten has done that and more[/QUOTE Gronk does seen to be more of a WR than Witten, that I agree with.
ringmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #24
Illini88228
Senior Member
 
Illini88228's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2010
Posts:
1,113
Default

It's not a particularly sexy so record, so I'm not super surprised that it's not getting more attention than it is.

But, it does amaze me how little attention Jason Witten gets in general. His career numbers are unreal. He's the best tight end in football and has been for quite a while, and he gets no respect whatsoever from the media. He is an actual tight end too, not just an overgrown wide receiver. I always assumed it's because he's not dramatic or flashy at all. He's a total blue collar type. Maybe if he had a big flashy dance or something...
Illini88228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #25
Joshmil53
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2011
Posts:
2,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ringmaster View Post
I agree you won't hear any arguements from me on this one.

Do you see another WR breaking Johnson's record anytime soon?
Dez Bryant

/homer
Joshmil53 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #26
Dale
Forum Architect
 
Dale's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
San Antonio, TX
Posts:
4,709
Send a message via AIM to Dale
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Future View Post
Agreed.

This is a so so record at a very unsexy position. I'm not surprised there isn't much attention being paid.
Agreed. If he were setting the all-time single-season receptions record, it'd be one thing. But he's setting the single-season record for tight ends. Doesn't carry nearly the same cache -- just like when he set the single-game receptions record for a tight end. It's a great feat, but nothing like some of the other single-season record chases going on right now.
Dale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #27
AdamJT13
Salary Cap Analyst
 
AdamJT13's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
14,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsandTerps View Post
Perhaps AdamJT can assist with this answer as far as Witten targets compared to other TE's...
Witten has been targeted 140 times this season, the most by any tight end. In second is Jimmy Graham, who has been targeted 21 fewer times and has 27 fewer catches.

When Gonzalez had 102 catches in 2004, he was targeted 148 times. And that's not even his career high for targets. He was targeted 150 times (93 catches) in 2000, 154 times (99 catches) in 2007 and 155 times (96 catches) in 2008.

When Witten had 96 catches in 2007, he was targeted 141 times.
AdamJT13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #28
AdamJT13
Salary Cap Analyst
 
AdamJT13's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
14,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmd24 View Post
Most people don't care. Few remember that Dallas Clark had a chance to tie the record in 2009. The Colts were 14-1, and Manning and Clark played one quarter during the regular season finale in snowy Buffalo. Clark had 7 catches when he sat down and needed just 3 to break the record.
Clark had seven catches in the first quarter-plus (they played into the second quarter), and six of them came on screens and shovel passes behind the line of scrimmage. The other was a dumpoff pass thrown 6 yards over the middle.

Reggie Wayne caught five passes to get to 100 as well -- four of them were on wide receiver screens, and the other was on a pass thrown 4 yards downfield.

It's like the Colts just wanted to get both Clark and Wayne 100 catches the cheap way before letting them sit, and they didn't care about anything else. Their starters were in for 20 plays -- 18 passes and two runs (for minus-3 yards).
AdamJT13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #29
kmd24
Senior Member
 
kmd24's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13 View Post
Clark had seven catches in the first quarter-plus (they played into the second quarter), and six of them came on screens and shovel passes behind the line of scrimmage. The other was a dumpoff pass thrown 6 yards over the middle.

Reggie Wayne caught five passes to get to 100 as well -- four of them were on wide receiver screens, and the other was on a pass thrown 4 yards downfield.

It's like the Colts just wanted to get both Clark and Wayne 100 catches the cheap way before letting them sit, and they didn't care about anything else. Their starters were in for 20 plays -- 18 passes and two runs (for minus-3 yards).
Exactly right. Clark's last catch was the first play of the 2nd quarter on 3rd and I think 4. He lined up as tailback and caught a pass that was practically a handoff. If they wanted the record they could have easily gotten it on the next series, I think.
kmd24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012   #30
DallasDW00ds0n
Senior Member
 
DallasDW00ds0n's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
New Jersey
Posts:
2,783
Default

I just saw a guy with a customized NFL t-shirt, it said "Whitten" on the back.

Hes gotta have a most misspelled last name record for this board.
DallasDW00ds0n is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com