NFL: Tony Romo, Dallas Cowboys should part ways after latest loss - Page 10 - Dallas Cowboys Forum

SultanOfSix · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy

And that hasn't happened yet? LOL!

Please keep posting.

ROFL. LMAO. ORLY. OMG. LOL. It's a team game, oh master of football knowledge.

Section444 · 01-01-2013

The Cowboys will never win a title with Romo at QB. He's always been a good, not great QB. He can play great at times, but he's far too inconsistent to be a champion.

Cajuncowboy · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by SultanOfSix

ROFL. LMAO. ORLY. OMG. LOL. It's a team game, oh master of football knowledge.

And the team kept the game close until he choked it away with another well timed pick.

And if you don't think that then you are showing your complete and utter ignorance yet again.

tyke1doe · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by visionary

you guys are completely delusional

give romo

1) a real OC (like Norv)
2) a good OL
3) consistent running game

and he will win

the problems are jerry and jason not romo

So basically you're saying that we really can't rely on Romo unless everything around him is perfect?

Is that supposed to be some compliment for Romo?

ufcrules1 · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by SultanOfSix

I'll support him until he succeeds or fails.

You need to stop supporting him then.. because he has in fact failed. Actually, he has epically failed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SultanOfSix

Winning a SB is not easy.

I would start with settling for winning in a "Win and you're in" game. Actually, it would have been nice if he played decent against a pathetic 28th ranked defense in the league instead of melting down.

SultanOfSix · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy

It's using a phrase or term to say something else. Like "Brandt has forgot more about football than the collective of the broad knows about it". Meaning his is more knowledgeable than anyone here.

You have been checked.

eu·phe·mism (yf-mzm) n.
The act or an example of substituting a mild, indirect, or vague term for one considered harsh, blunt, or offensive: "Euphemisms such as 'slumber room' . . . abound in the funeral business" (Jessica Mitford).

hy·per·bo·le (h-pûrb-l) n.
A figure of speech in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect, as in I could sleep for a year or This book weighs a ton.

The readers can decide.

Section444 · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyke1doe

So basically you're saying that we really can't rely on Romo unless everything around him is perfect?

Is that supposed to be some compliment for Romo?

Great QB's find a way to make everyone around them better.

Cajuncowboy · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by ufcrules1

You need to stop supporting him then.. because he has in fact failed. Actually, he has epically failed.

Oh no. Apparently the sultan of football knowledge thinks that is succeeding.

Choking games away when they matter most is doing well.

Cajuncowboy · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by SultanOfSix

eu·phe·mism (yf-mzm) n.
The act or an example of substituting a mild, indirect, or vague term for one considered harsh, blunt, or offensive: "Euphemisms such as 'slumber room' . . . abound in the funeral business" (Jessica Mitford).

hy·per·bo·le (h-pûrb-l) n.
A figure of speech in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect, as in I could sleep for a year or This book weighs a ton.

The readers can decide.

Or phrase ... But really, this is what you want to hang your argument on?

Loser.

Cajuncowboy · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Section444

Great QB's find a way to make everyone around them better.

Did you not know that succeeding is the new failing?

SultanOfSix · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by ufcrules1

You need to stop supporting him then.. because he has in fact failed. Actually, he has epically failed.

As far as I know, he still has quite a few more opportunities left in him to succeed, but I'll do what I want, thank you very much.

Here's a suggestion. If Romo never wins a SB with the Cowboys (barring injury or retirement), I'll leave this forum. If he does, you'll leave it.

Cajuncowboy · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by SultanOfSix

As far as I know, he still has quite a few more opportunities left in him to succeed, but I'll do what I want, thank you very much.

Here's a suggestion. If Romo never wins a SB with the Cowboys (barring injury or retirement), I'll leave this forum. If he does, you'll leave it.

So if he retires or leaves sometime in this off season you will go away?

Oh now I want a trade now worse than ever. I would trade him for a sack of used footballs.

SultanOfSix · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy

Or phrase ... But really, this is what you want to hang your argument on?

It seems that your ego is getting in the way of your rationality.

Quote:

Loser.

Are you calling me a "loser" as in being a nobody, or a "loser" as in losing the argument, or both.

Because the former is your opinion and that is fine by me, two is non-factual because it is in fact you who have lost.

SultanOfSix · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy

So if he retires or leaves sometime in this off season you will go away?

Oh now I want a trade now worse than ever. I would trade him for a sack of used footballs.

LOL. I said "barring" retirement or injury, meaning the bet doesn't apply if the case holds. And you mocked me for my reading comprehension earlier?

You're welcome to take this bet too.

Cajuncowboy · 01-01-2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by SultanOfSix

It seems that your ego is getting in the way of your rationality.

Are you calling me a "loser" as in being a nobody, or a "loser" as in losing the argument, or both.

Because the former is your opinion and that is fine by me, two is non-factual because it is in fact you who have lost.

This coming from a guy who thinks 8-8 and throwing three picks in a win or go home game is succeeding. Rational, yeah right.