
|
01-01-2013
|
#31
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2009 |
Posts: | 2,011 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMorgan
Perhaps Garrett just needs to call a more balanced game.
|
What would help the most is making your defense strong on the other side, so you can continue to stick to the offensive gameplan without worrying about playing in catch up mode. You have your CB's/LB core, now it's time to find some gems at the DE/NT position & plug in a serviceable safety for now
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#32
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2012 |
Posts: | 787 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zack
Actually it was Julius Jones in 2006. But this is what the team needs to be successful on offense. Romo is more than capable and he would excel if he had the Seahawks, Redskins, 49ers, Vikings running games. Can you imagine if we had a good running game?
But is Garrett really committed to doing this? Even in the game against the Skins, Romo threw it 40 times.
|
Exactly, Demarco was averaging over 4 yards a pop and Tecmo was still playing videogames out there. As long as Garretts here we will be a bottom 1/3rd running team. Deal with it.
The Dallas "Football" Cowboys a team where everyone is accountable*.
*Unless their name is Jerry or Jason.
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#33
|
|
Salary Cap Analyst
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 14,759 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venger
Adam - can you toss some red zone short yardage stats at us? I need to see why your stat doesn't jive with general observation, and perhaps we are keying heavily on red zone situations... or is it 4th down? I want to make sure we haven't done a little specification searching with those numbers...
|
We finished sixth in TD/first down percentage on all rushing plays in the red zone. If you go only by runs inside the 10, we finished ninth in first down/TD percentage. Inside the 3, we tied for 17th -- but keep reading.
One reason why people might think we struggled on short yardage was a few times when we were near the goal line and failed to punch it in on first or second down -- we were 2 of 7 on runs inside the 3 on first or second down. But we went 2-for-2 on third-down runs and 1-for-1 on fourth-down runs, so we eventually did punch it in each time. We scored a TD every time we got inside the 3 this season, because our only third-down incomplete pass was followed by a TD run on fourth down.
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#34
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Haley's Comet |
Posts: | 3,990 |
|
1 Seattle Seahawks
2 New England Patriots
3 Washington Redskins
4 Houston Texans
5 Kansas City Chiefs
6 New York Jets
7 San Francisco 49ers
8 Minnesota Vikings
9 Denver Broncos
10 Chicago Bears
11 Carolina Panthers
12 Baltimore Ravens
13 Buffalo Bills
14 Indianapolis Colts
14 Miami Dolphins
16 Green Bay Packers
17 Cincinnati Bengals
This is the ranking for run attempts. Most of the playoff teams are on that list. Coincidence? I don't think so.
Not all the teams on that list run well yardage wise but they still attempt to run.
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#35
|
|
Salary Cap Analyst
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 14,759 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zman5
1 Seattle Seahawks
2 New England Patriots
3 Washington Redskins
4 Houston Texans
5 Kansas City Chiefs
6 New York Jets
7 San Francisco 49ers
8 Minnesota Vikings
9 Denver Broncos
10 Chicago Bears
11 Carolina Panthers
12 Baltimore Ravens
13 Buffalo Bills
14 Indianapolis Colts
14 Miami Dolphins
16 Green Bay Packers
17 Cincinnati Bengals
This is the ranking for run attempts. Most of the playoff teams are on that list. Coincidence? I don't think so.
Not all the teams on that list run well yardage wise but they still attempt to run.
|
Congratulations, you just proved that teams run the ball more when they're ahead in the fourth quarter and trying to run out the clock instead of having to pass to catch up.
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#36
|
|
Research Tool
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | under this tree |
Posts: | 6,429 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFinisher
Unfortunately, we are not one of those teams that can be a contender relying heavily on the pass. Romo is a capable QB, but if we continue to put too much on his shoulders we're going to continue watching the playoffs from home.
|
Where are all these teams who are relying heavily on the pass and winning?
These were the only QB who had as many as 5 different games with over 40 attempts. None of them had a winning record in those games.
Games of >40 att/Rating
13 Stafford 82.3 W3 L10
10 Brees 86.4 W2 L8
7 Romo 84.6 W3 L4
7 Luck 72.0 W3 L4
6 Palmer 84.9 W1 L5
6 Brady 82.2 W2 L4
5 Ryan 81.6 W2 L3
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#37
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2004 |
Location: | Right behind you |
Posts: | 5,090 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFinisher
Unfortunately, we are not one of those teams that can be a contender relying heavily on the pass. Romo is a capable QB, but if we continue to put too much on his shoulders we're going to continue watching the playoffs from home. All is not lost and we do not have to blow things up, but we absolutely MUST develop a good running game to give ourselves a chance. It's going to help the QB by slowing down the pass rush AND the defense by keeping them off the field. The running game is the foundation of every good balanced offense, and its what we've been missing during the Romo/Garrett era.
Even if all we do this off-season is bring in some road graders up front and a complementary bell-cow to Murray, we'll still see a much improved team come September. Get back to basics, pound the rock.
|
ummm for sure. In addition we need a pounding RB. Murray is awesome but can we count on him for 16+ games in a season? We need either a FA or higher draft pick that is starting caliber.
Still left to accomplish:
sign OT Winston or G Moore
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#38
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2012 |
Location: | Cybertron |
Posts: | 242 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13
Congratulations, you just proved that teams run the ball more when they're ahead in the fourth quarter and trying to run out the clock instead of having to pass to catch up.
|
Congratulations, you now have to sort through a great deal of play by play stats to back up that claim. You just jumped the shark.
It's a message board, that's what the topics are for.
What I don't understand...insistence...disdain...It's one thing to feel that way, and to say so. Why try to make other people agree with you....And why pretend...Disagree with me all you like...Don't start twisting mine or getting frustrated just because I don't want to eat the other half of that crap-sandwich you made for yourself...Because I don't happen to like crap sandwiches.
--Ecclesiastes 10:13
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#39
|
|
It ain't over 'til it's over
Joined: | Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 3,563 |
|
Dallas has the running back in Murray. Just need to fix the O-Line he is running behind 
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#40
|
|
Sanka, Ya Dead Mon? Ya Mon.
Joined: | Jan 2011 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 4,223 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
It's definitely the blocking. We haven't had a real quality OL in nearly two decades. Our short yardage and red zone offense has always been a joke because of it. Just putting a hat on a hat situations aren't winnable for the Cowboys.
I don't care what back you have, he's not going to excel with that many stiffs blocking. No offensive coordinator and/or play caller is going to overcome that either.
|
Guarantee Murray and Felix get the job done with a better OL.
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#41
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Charlotte, NC |
Posts: | 1,645 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RastaRocket
Guarantee Murray and Felix get the job done with a better OL.
|
And I guarantee Romo will benefit too...
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#42
|
|
Research Tool
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | under this tree |
Posts: | 6,429 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zman5
1 Seattle Seahawks
2 New England Patriots
3 Washington Redskins
4 Houston Texans
7 San Francisco 49ers
8 Minnesota Vikings
9 Denver Broncos
12 Baltimore Ravens
14 Indianapolis Colts
16 Green Bay Packers
17 Cincinnati Bengals
This is the ranking for run attempts. Most of the playoff teams are on that list. Coincidence? I don't think so.
|
The Patriots, Broncos, and Packers don't run that much in the first half of games. They're only on your list because they run late after they build leads. You can confirm this by looking at the number of pass attempts by their QB in the first half of games. Brady, Manning, and Rodgers are among the leaders in 1st half attempts.
The Falcons are also a playoff team, and they aren't on your list. Ryan is second only to Brees in first half attempts.
None of these teams is among the top 10 in yards per rush. They are able to have a high number of rushing attempts because they build leads by outpassing their opponents. The Falcons, Packers, Patriots, and Broncos are all top 7 in passer rating differential, however. There's your important stat.
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#43
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2012 |
Posts: | 419 |
|
Hmm seems to me like Garrett needs to be a better playcaller. The second the Cowboys fall behind, he's calling pass plays of some form every down. Part of it is the defense not making stops but our offense doesn't click early.. Garrett wants the running backs to get 8 yards per carry to keep running the ball, if they don't he goes away from it.
Honestly, I thought the run game against the Skins was fine, a few losses but Murray was getting about 4 and half yards other times.
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#44
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2012 |
Posts: | 267 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zack
Actually it was Julius Jones in 2006. But this is what the team needs to be successful on offense. Romo is more than capable and he would excel if he had the Seahawks, Redskins, 49ers, Vikings running games. Can you imagine if we had a good running game?
But is Garrett really committed to doing this? Even in the game against the Skins, Romo threw it 40 times.
|
Stephan Taylor enough said .
|
|
|
01-01-2013
|
#45
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2008 |
Posts: | 1,132 |
|
Best instant upgrade to the offense in general- leave Garrett completely out of any involvement with it. Put him in a booth with a couple of those pole dancers to keep him occupied.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.
|