
|
01-14-2013
|
#166
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2008 |
Location: | San Francisco, C |
Posts: | 199 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY
They both ran read option offenses, practically from the time they came into the NFL. Each played in offenses that had elements of Read Option in them.
|
Vick and Vince Young was missing an element essential of a read option offence success. They are not accurate passers.
|
|
|
01-14-2013
|
#167
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2011 |
Location: | Yuma, AZ |
Posts: | 624 |
|
2 things that I think might work against the R/O.
1. DE/OLB always take a direct path to the QB.
2. Run stunts so the QB "reads" the DE/OLB crashing but an ILB/DT is looping out to in effect give a false "read".
Either way hit the QB as often and as hard as you can.
|
|
|
01-14-2013
|
#168
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 6,167 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuma Cactus
Either way hit the QB as often and as hard as you can.
|
Yeah decking the QB every time they do it will end it. Noone will want their QB taking that many hits cause they do add up for the game, and if they see him out there getting killed they will stop doing it.
If he wants to run, treat him like a running back and if he wants to slide, make him slide in the backfield. I saw what the 9er fan said about teams having a good running game being more effective with it, problem is their effectiveness is increased greatly by the run option so of course they run well.
Deck the QB, and you don't have to worry about him running.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#169
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Nov 2009 |
Posts: | 175 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuma Cactus
2 things that I think might work against the R/O.
1. DE/OLB always take a direct path to the QB.
2. Run stunts so the QB "reads" the DE/OLB crashing but an ILB/DT is looping out to in effect give a false "read".
Either way hit the QB as often and as hard as you can.
|
The offense will use the FB to loop around the DE and block your ILB/DT. The DE is not blocked at all. He takes himself out of the play.
HTTR
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#170
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Location: | Chesapeake, VA |
Posts: | 1,664 |
|
College ball is pumping out read option qb's like the Fed is printing money. You can get a new one every year. I would suit up 3 qb's every game.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#171
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Feb 2008 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 16,905 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slaga
The offense will use the FB to loop around the DE and block your ILB/DT. The DE is not blocked at all. He takes himself out of the play.
|
Especially if his name is D Ware.
I know he was very hurt, but he seemed very unprepared mentally to defend that play and was always out of position. Granted, RG3 is a great ball-handler, but Ware was clueless.
That to me, reflected on Rob Byan and the staff.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#172
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Nov 2011 |
Posts: | 543 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuma Cactus
2 things that I think might work against the R/O.
1. DE/OLB always take a direct path to the QB.
2. Run stunts so the QB "reads" the DE/OLB crashing but an ILB/DT is looping out to in effect give a false "read".
Either way hit the QB as often and as hard as you can.
|
this is why i think the read option is just a fad that will pass on
i love the read option but after awhile defenses will adjust and the unblocked end will just go straight and hit the quarterback no guessing anymore, and those million dollar quarterbacks will take too many shots
will the read option work if a team like the skins, 9ers run it for years? I think so but do they want their quarterback in the dirt 5 times a game, along with sacks and other pressure
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#173
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 7,974 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinnie2u
College ball is pumping out read option qb's like the Fed is printing money. You can get a new one every year. I would suit up 3 qb's every game.
|
I agree. We can snag a R/O QB late in the draft. I want one !!!
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#174
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 7,974 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayhouston12
this is why i think the read option is just a fad that will pass on
i love the read option but after awhile defenses will adjust and the unblocked end will just go straight and hit the quarterback no guessing anymore, and those million dollar quarterbacks will take too many shots
will the read option work if a team like the skins, 9ers run it for years? I think so but do they want their quarterback in the dirt 5 times a game, along with sacks and other pressure
|
Yep ... even if it leads to a penalty. Have the DE head straight for the QB and put a helmet into his chest regardless if he has the ball or not.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#175
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,550 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly
Vick and Vince Young was missing an element essential of a read option offence success. They are not accurate passers.
|
Not true. As a running QB, both were much better. Neither were what I would call accurate but both were better throwing on the run then they were completing passes in a traditional drop back offense.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#176
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,550 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NIBGoldenchild
The QB is instructed to only run when the DE/OLB is playing the tailback, that leaves him wide open to run and have plenty of time to slide or get out of bounds. The play is always being ran away from him, so there are only the defenders on the weak side with an opportunity to hit him, and you already know one isn't there. If the opportunity isn't there, the ball goes to the tailback. I've often seen RG3 keep it only twice a game. If a defense is been particularly undisciplined, you'll see him keep it more.
So actually, only one of the 3 options exposes your quarterback. He'll either hand it off to the RB, throw it, or keep it himself. Keeping it himself happens the least. How good your personnel is running the offense and how the defense plays it, determines how many times the QB is handing off or throwing.
|
No. I understand the design of the read option but, you can not account for everything the defense will do. Things break down and your QB is going to get hit. It's the NFL. If your QB gets hit, he's going to get hurt. I mean, that's really what it comes down to.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#177
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,550 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101
Again the QB is not hanging on to the ball like some old fashion option play and NFL does not let you kill QB's. You got just as much of a chance getting hammered in the pocket. Look at Romo broken collar bone, broken ribs and injured ribs in the last game. If this was an offense that was soley about running the ball out of this formation then I would agree but it's not, guys with very good passing skills can run it be it RGIII or Andy Dalton.
In my view it is not anything like the wildcat which is nothing but a direct snap to the RB and it is soley a running play the defense know exactly what you are going to do. The Pistol does not allow you to key on just one thing you have to play the field because you can throw out of it just as easy as you can running out of it.
|
Right, and the Defense is not just rushing up the field in designated passing lanes either. Defense gets paid to play football too. You can't know what a defense will do to counter you. You may depend on the fact that a DC will devise a game plan to hit you as much as possible. This is not new stuff. We've seen QBs try to run this for years. It's not as if this is new this year. What always happens? You get your QB killed.
I'm sorry, I don't agree.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#178
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,550 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwmyers
When Vick came into the league, the coach in Atlanta was Dan Reeves, and he was running a version of Tom Landry's offense.
(sarcasm) You know, zone read central (/sarcasm).
D-
|
I recall. In fact, I also remember Reeves wanting to get away from running as much of, what he called "Freelance", offense with Vick. In fact, that was a major issue between he and the organization and ultimately, that's what helped get him fired. Vick wanted to run this offense and Reeves wanted to move away from it and develop Vick in a more traditional offense with more of a running game dependent play action style.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#179
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,550 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwmyers
In 2000-2001 how many people were running the spread offense? If Rich Rodriguez is credited with inventing it, where did Vick learn it, from Tommy Bowden at Tulane or Clemson? Vick's coach in college was Frank Beamer, for crying out loud, a defensive guru and a 4-4 disciple.
Option plays, yes. The option is as old as Don Faurot. The zone read out of the spread? Almost certainly not. It wasn't that common when Vick came out of college.
D-
|
This is crazy. That offense has been around since Roger Staubach at Navy. Heck, before that. The 49ers ran a version of this with Steve Young. Doug Williams ran it as well. They have been running this in Canada since they had football in Canada. I mean, this is not new. Come on guys.
The NFL has not used it because NFL coaches know that once you lose your QB, your done.
|
|
|
01-15-2013
|
#180
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Sep 2005 |
Posts: | 2,050 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY
This is crazy. That offense has been around since Roger Staubach at Navy. Heck, before that. The 49ers ran a version of this with Steve Young. Doug Williams ran it as well. They have been running this in Canada since they had football in Canada. I mean, this is not new. Come on guys.
The NFL has not used it because NFL coaches know that once you lose your QB, your done.
|
Not true
Rich Rodriguez at Clemson was the primary inventor of the 21st century "read option" offense which he then took to WVU and had success with Pat White.
http://smartfootball.com/run-game/th...adruple-option
Chris Ault at Neveda invented the "pistol" formation which started in 2005
http://www.sbnation.com/longform/201...l-redskins-rg3
Quote:
|
Before the 2005 season, Ault, unhappy with his offense, presented his staff with a new idea – a shotgun formation with the running back aligned directly behind the quarterback. “They thought I’d lost my marbles,” Ault recently recalled [source]. But with the “Pistol” Nevada went from near the bottom to the top of its conference in offensive production and over the next few years slowly added additional components to the attack to make it even more effective.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.
|