Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > News Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2013   #1
btcutter
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,263
Default Why Cowboys Had To Replace Rob Ryan, Part II: Adapting To A Changing Landscape

Fantastic article on defense!

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2013/...i-monte-kiffin
btcutter is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2013   #2
Teague31
Defender of the Star
 
Teague31's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Location:
Ozark, Missouri
Posts:
5,474
Default

Good read
Teague31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #3
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,315
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

A powerful read.

Everyone should read it– twice.


Terrific explanation on why Rob Ryan's 3-4 defense is out of date.
MichaelWinicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #4
jday
Senior Member
 
jday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btcutter View Post
Very good read. But it is discouraging, as well. The Cowboys seem to be a long way off from having the personnel to pull this defense off, particularly considering our overall defenses speed.
jday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #5
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,598
Default

Great article. Now I'm wondering where the one is about the offense, or do we wait till AFTER the change is made to say it had to be made?

Isn't this also, in some ways, an indictment against resigning a 32 year old gunslinger? I'm not anti-romo, but if you want to sell the Ryan fire as a re-imagining of our Dallas Cowboys, maybe it's time to also bring in a QB that can run this so-called next generation offense.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #6
BlueStar3398
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2010
Location:
Texas
Posts:
1,525
Default

They said on "The Break" that some of the Defensive staff were not getting along at the end of the season. Jerome Henderson was not attending meetings with some of the staff for some reason.
BlueStar3398 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #7
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
1-star thread
Posts:
32,066
Default

Meh, that article is way off. Jimmy didn't invent the 1-gap 43; that's ridiculous.

Nor did he have any success against OU at Okie State -- he never beat them, and gave up 38, 63, 27, 27 and 21 points to them.

Know why he beat them at Miami? Because he had insane talent on those teams, especially up front. Jimmy's teams lived in other teams' backfields and that beat basically every offense, not just Oklahoma's wishbone. Jerome Brown and Co. will do that.

And I like how he totally ignored Kiffin's record vs the spread the last couple of years.

Funny how just two years ago it was Rob who had the high-tech, whiz-bang offense that had buffaloed Brady and Brees. Now it's all outdated and 72-year-old Kiffin has the defense for the latest and greatest.

I'm not even against the 43 cover-2 or Kiffin at all. At the very least I think we'll be more sound and won't beat ourselves with mistakes as often. But there's a lot of hope-reaching in this "article".
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #8
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,598
Default

Hate to double dip, but man does this sound good:

Quote:
Instead of telling defensive linemen to 2-gap and watching them get fooled by the option on every play, he switched entirely to a 1-gap system. Johnson simplified things for them by giving them one job and telling them to attack...
I'll also add that while they say Jerry became aware of this, this year. There's some evidence to suggest they were thinking 4-3 before that. Remember when they said they'd have taken Wagner in the 2nd if they hadn't grabbed Claiborne?
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.

Last edited by TheCount : 01-16-2013 at 04:09 PM.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #9
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,315
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jday View Post
Very good read. But it is discouraging, as well. The Cowboys seem to be a long way off from having the personnel to pull this defense off, particularly considering our overall defenses speed.
I know what you're saying...

But I think there are several players on the defense that have more than enough speed to make this switch:

The two corners
Two of the three linebackers (don't know who the 3rd one is)
Ware
Lissmore, Crawford and Hatcher are fast enough for the defensive line.

If Spencer stays, he's fast enough. If not, then they need someone.

Safety is a "push". Tampa's defense didn't feature 4.4 safeties.

The defense isn't that far off (speed wise).
MichaelWinicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #10
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,362
Default

This defense needs 3 key pieces to work.

1) Big defensive tackle as of today they dont have.

2) Fast weak side speed LB. Where does Carter play?

3) Safety play. Sensabaugh is rumored out. Church is coming off an achilles. Johnson after being injured as a senior didnt even make it out of the trainers room last year.

For this to work alot of pieces that are at best questionable and at worst non existent have to fall in place.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #11
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,315
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
This defense needs 3 key pieces to work.

1) Big defensive tackle as of today they dont have.

2) Fast weak side speed LB. Where does Carter play?

3) Safety play. Sensabaugh is rumored out. Church is coming off an achilles. Johnson after being injured as a senior didnt even make it out of the trainers room last year.

For this to work alot of pieces that are at best questionable and at worst non existent have to fall in place.
A big DT?

Why?

Kiffin didn't have a big DT at Tampa.

And Carter played OLB in college.

Johson didn't have big DT's at Dallas.
MichaelWinicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #12
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki View Post
A big DT?

Why?

Kiffin didn't have a big DT at Tampa.

And Carter played OLB in college.

Johson didn't have big DT's at Dallas.
And why is a big DT more important in the 4-3 than what we were using in the 3-4?

If we're going by prototypes, both Lee and Carter are WAY more in line with a prototype 4-3 LB than a prototype 3-4 LB. 3-4 LBs ideally weight 250+ because they have unprotected gap control, and are often asked to stack and shed 330 lbs. offensive guards. That's why Wade ran off DeMarco Ryans in Houston to bring in Bradie James.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #13
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki View Post
A big DT?

Why?

Kiffin didn't have a big DT at Tampa.

And Carter played OLB in college.

Johson didn't have big DT's at Dallas.
I think both Rat and Spears (who excelled in the 4-3 at LSU) could play the defensive front for Kiffin.
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #14
btcutter
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,263
Default

In either 3/4 or 4/3 we have needs.

Our personnel actually favors a 4-3 as Lee and Carter are ideal 4-3 backers. What is really lacking is S play and depth in DL to rotate in fresh bodies constantly.

Oh, Morris really going to have to step up in his CB spot to play physical. In someways Scandrick may fit better in Cover Two than Morris.
btcutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013   #15
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101 View Post
I think both Rat and Spears (who excelled in the 4-3 at LSU) could play the defensive front for Kiffin.
I would LOVE to see Spears earn and excel as a starter. The dude deserves it. He gets bagged on so much, but he's never complained about his role and consistently talks about how his life could be worse than being a roleplayer in the NFL.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com