Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-19-2013   #46
Bluestang
Senior Member
 
Bluestang's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2009
Location:
Idaho
Posts:
4,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
He really is a doofus.
I called him on that statement that don't even have a weak side linebacker. I mean, Carter is a prototype Will. He emailed me back saying he was not a Will.
It'd be comical if it wasn't so pathetic.

Did he really say that?

Carter played the WOLB position in college...what the heck was Goose thinking?
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
Bluestang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #47
SWG9
Senior Member
 
SWG9's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2011
Posts:
727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rack Bauer View Post
He's been playing DE since he's been in the league (nickel/Dime). Hell, even in the 3-4 he's basically been a DE that stands up.

Goose is a freaking moron.
IDK, Goose was responsible for drafting DeMarcus Ware. I'd take what he says somewhat seriously.
SWG9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #48
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWG9 View Post
IDK, Goose was responsible for drafting DeMarcus Ware. I'd take what he says somewhat seriously.
Explain.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #49
dwmyers
Senior Member
 
dwmyers's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Atlanta
Posts:
1,951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyChris View Post
Goose on with Norm. great listen

you need 8 DL in place, we have 8 LB's, lot harder to find DL than LB's

Ware doesnt fit at DE
Spencer doesnt fit at all
Ratliff isnt a Warren Sapp

we dont have a 3 tech DT
we dont have a WLB
we dont have the safety in place either, really emphasizing Safety, high round pick

http://stationcaster.com/player_skin...=4891&f=987191
Comment about DL hard to find is true, but..

Ware is light for a 43 DE, but in schemes that allow for it, he can certainly play it. Ditto Spencer.

Rat's a 1 tech in a 43, so the Sapp comparison is immaterial.
Hatcher is your 3 tech.

Either of our ILBs (Lee, Carter) can play any of the 3 43 LB spots. They're that good and fast. In a classic Miami 43 (Tampa not too far removed from the Miami), you get your WLB by drafting an oversized SS. They're not hard to find. It certainly wouldn't hurt you to try Ernie Sims at WLB either.

What I don't get is this laser like focus on a 4 man front, when in all probability, this first year we're going to play a mix of fronts.
dwmyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #50
dwmyers
Senior Member
 
dwmyers's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Atlanta
Posts:
1,951
Opinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
He really is a doofus.
I called him on that statement that don't even have a weak side linebacker. I mean, Carter is a prototype Will. He emailed me back saying he was not a Will.
It'd be comical if it wasn't so pathetic.
Carter isn't just a prototype Will, he's a prototype 46 adjuster.

The 46 adjuster has to be able to play line technique, LB technique, and run down the field with 3rd wide receivers on the field, as well as TEs.

46 places extreme demands on the stock 4-3 positions of WLB and SS, and he could do it.

~~~

Of course, in the early 2000s, Goose proclaimed the Arizona line with Leonard Davis at LT as the future of the NFL. That the line subsequently never held up to the promise posed by all the high end draft choices poured into it, shouldn't surprise anyone, as it was picked for size as opposed to athleticism. But that's a classic Goose proclamation when it comes to football.

Goose is a good sports reporter, well respected by his peers. He's not very good at analyzing football.

D-
dwmyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #51
Joe Rod
Do you like movies about Gladiators?
 
Joe Rod's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Somewhere Awesom
Posts:
7,531
Default

Why did this nimrod go away from the draft? He went from being a good source of information to just another jackwad that spews baseless opinionated drivel.
Joe Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #52
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Rod View Post
Why did this nimrod go away from the draft? He went from being a good source of information to just another jackwad that spews baseless opinionated drivel.
Because newspapers are dinosaurs and subscriptions are endangered. The only way to make up revenue lost is traffic clicks. The way to get those is to be paparazzi sensationalistic in what you report.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #53
noshame
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,221
Default

The 4-3 isn't so much about the "right size" player, it's about playmakers. It's about unburdening guys and letting them go to the ball.

Welcome back!
By the end of 2014 Romo will not be starting for the cowboys and the most popular phrase on the board will be..."see I knew we shouldn't have signed him to that big contract".
noshame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #54
CowboyChris
Senior Member
 
CowboyChris's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Corpus Christi
Posts:
2,630
Send a message via AIM to CowboyChris Send a message via Yahoo to CowboyChris
Default

if anyone listened to that interview, Goose was for the most part quoting what Dungy had said about our personnel, those werent all his opinions.

The part about Ware was pretty much his opinion, comparing it to Derrick Thomas when he used to cover KC, that when KC made the switch Thomas' numbers fell off dramatically, DE would be to physical for Ware.
CowboyChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #55
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyChris View Post
if anyone listened to that interview, Goose was for the most part quoting what Dungy had said about our personnel, those werent all his opinions.

The part about Ware was pretty much his opinion, comparing it to Derrick Thomas when he used to cover KC, that when KC made the switch Thomas' numbers fell off dramatically, DE would be to physical for Ware.
Ware bench presses over 400 pounds. He's hardly a daisy.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #56
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwmyers View Post
Comment about DL hard to find is true, but..

Ware is light for a 43 DE, but in schemes that allow for it, he can certainly play it. Ditto Spencer.

Rat's a 1 tech in a 43, so the Sapp comparison is immaterial.
Hatcher is your 3 tech.

Either of our ILBs (Lee, Carter) can play any of the 3 43 LB spots. They're that good and fast. In a classic Miami 43 (Tampa not too far removed from the Miami), you get your WLB by drafting an oversized SS. They're not hard to find. It certainly wouldn't hurt you to try Ernie Sims at WLB either.

What I don't get is this laser like focus on a 4 man front, when in all probability, this first year we're going to play a mix of fronts.
No matter what scheme the team chose to employ this year, they needed to get better along the defensive front. Staying 3-4 would have meant upgrades/reinforcements at NT/DE/OLB. 4-3 means DT and DE.

The linebackers, in my opinion, really aren't a concern. 4-3 OLBs are fairly easy to find IMO. What I would do though is have Carter work at both WOLB and in the middle. I don't think Dallas has a good option for the Tampa 2 MLB position other than Lee and Carter. And with their injury history, it is a concern. I'd feel more comfortable moving Carter over in case of a Lee injury and backfilling WOLB than to try to fill in someone at MLB.

This is, of course, a moot point provided McSurdy fully recovers from his injury.
junk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #57
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
1-star thread
Posts:
32,049
Default

His argument about Carter was that with his size, he'd be best on the strong side handling the tight end.

I'm with those who wouldn't be shocked if Carter plays in the middle and Lee on the weakside, as when Quarles was the mike and Brooks the will in later years at Tampa. You'd still probably expect Lee in the middle, but the other way could happen.
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #58
Dodger12
Senior Member
Years Donated
2008, 2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWG9 View Post
IDK, Goose was responsible for drafting DeMarcus Ware. I'd take what he says somewhat seriously.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
Explain.
I think this is what SWG9 is referring to. It was brought up by Bluestang in another thread some time ago. I never heard the interview so I can't speak to it's content, just providing the link that I think is being referred to in this thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestang View Post
Just an interesting tidbit here about the drafting of Demarcus Ware:

Mickey Spagnola offered his account of the story on Talkin' Cowboys this offseason. There was a big divide amongst scouts and coaches on who the first pick would be. As you guys know Parcells wanted Spears and the other half wanted Ware. Spagnola had a conversation with Rich Gooselin of the DMN and Gooselin had shown Mickey his own scouting report of DeMarcus Ware and was so impressed by it he told Goose that he should show it to Jerry Jones. Goose did so and Jerry Jones presented it the next day to everyone in their meeting and then subsequently the group decided that Ware would be the first pick.
Dodger12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #59
cboyd
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Posts:
385
Default

We are a couple of drafts from getting the players to run the 4-3, we need a defensive end(if Spencer leaves), we need a defensive tackle to compliment Spencer, we need a SLB, and we need a playmaking centerfield type safety. At the same time we also have a lot of pieces to run the 4-3. I think this year will be a little bit of a transition, but too say its a total transition is just BS, we will be fine
cboyd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013   #60
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodger12 View Post
I think this is what SWG9 is referring to. It was brought up by Bluestang in another thread some time ago. I never heard the interview so I can't speak to it's content, just providing the link that I think is being referred to in this thread.


I forgot about this. They got lucky with Ware, but it illustrates how screwed up the Dallas front office is that they are being influenced by a write up from a newspaper guy.

If true, it is a sad indictment of the state of the Dallas front office. By far, the most beneficial thing to this team would be a qualified GM, with a long term vision, leading the personnel acquistion efforts.
junk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com