Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > News Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-20-2013   #1
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
US
Posts:
26,076
Default Calculating 2013 Cap Space for Every NFL Team

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...l-tCalculating 2013 Cap Space for Every NFL Team



Speculating about free agency is a pastime for fans of teams that failed to qualify for the playoffs—or in today's case, have already been eliminated.

But, with free agency now on the horizon, it's time to curb the wild speculation and separate the contenders from the pretenders. In other words, it's time to establish which NFL teams actually have the cap space to compete in free agency and which teams will sit by the sidelines.

ESPN's John Clayton provided a great breakdown of each team's projected cap space headed into 2013, and these figures are used in this article—along with analysis, of course.

These projected cap numbers are subject to change as teams cut and restructure contracts over the next two months. Anyway, here's an idea of how each NFL team shapes up financially heading into a free-agency period that figures to feature plenty of talent.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-20-2013   #2
Cajuncowboy
Preacher From The Black Lagoon
 
Cajuncowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
State of Grace
Posts:
27,478
Default

I'm sorry....Did that say we are 18 Mil over the cap?


For a great free bible study tool check out http://www.e-sword.net

"Those who would deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves..."-Abraham Lincoln
Cajuncowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #3
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy View Post
I'm sorry....Did that say we are 18 Mil over the cap?
Yes. It is the black and white cap space situation.

Of course we extend Romo and hand Carr a check and we're back under the cap.

But we do have far too much money tied up in guys who didnt produce enough last year: Free, Miles, OS, Ratliff. Injury caused the last 3 to under-produce.

We can make cuts but we end up eating salary to do so. Each cut costs us about 480k because anyone removed roster member promotes another charge for the next guy in line.

Once we declare our tags and restricted guys we'll still be under the cap. But it's mot likely we'll be very far under. UNLESS we just let Spencer walk with no compensation except a late r4 guy next year.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #4
Hoofbite
Senior Member
 
Hoofbite's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
29,072
Default

Nobody should be shocked and anyone who is has no one to blame but themselves for being willfully ignorant to the the number of articles spanning back to at least November that have come out.

There's been a number of reports with similar values but a vast majority simply write it off because Adam hasn't come out and put the actual numbers out there.

That said, Dallas will do the annual salary cap dance and push the money off into the future. I think they really need to be mindful of what could happen if they continue this approach and players like Murray, Lee, Carter, Dez, Tyron and others continue to develop.

If you constantly have to manipulate the numbers in order to operate in a year where you don't have a ton of young talent looking at Free Agency, making decisions on who to keep isn't out of the question.
Hoofbite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #5
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,042
Default

Every year the cap is a problem for Dallas. I don't think Stephen is the guru that some claims he is.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #6
Manwiththeplan
Senior Member
 
Manwiththeplan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
4,000
Default

As long as that includes the $5 million dollar cap penalty, I'm not too worried. Add $2-3 million from unused cap space, plus extending Romo, restructuring Carr and we are under. Any money we need for free agents can be created by restructuring a few others as well as releasing a few.


Greatest Plank Ever!
Manwiththeplan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #7
wileedog
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnday View Post
Every year the cap is a problem for Dallas. I don't think Stephen is the guru that some claims he is.
I think his dad's penchant for extending guys with large contracts when he shouldn't is a bigger problem.
wileedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #8
T-RO
Benched
 
Joined:
Jan 2009
Posts:
3,669
Default

Just another exhibit of how poorly this team is run.

We are mediocre now, and will be operating at a disadvantage in the future.

The prudent thing would be to take one season and get the financial house in order....not perpetuate more bleeding. Miles, Free and probably Ratliff should be cut loose. Absorb the hit and free the team up to be in good shape in '14.

But at 71 years of age, with a DC who will be turning 73 in a few weeks...I don't think Jerry cares squat about where the team will be sitting 3 or 5 years from now. He'll likely just push us into a Daniel Snyder type fiscal hole and spend like a drunken sailor.
T-RO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #9
Hoofbite
Senior Member
 
Hoofbite's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
29,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnday View Post
Every year the cap is a problem for Dallas. I don't think Stephen is the guru that some claims he is.
I'm not a fan of the route the team has taken and continues to be on.

Write contracts to be re-worked the following year in order to operate. I'd rather they be in a position to re-work them in order to be able to go all out but can still operate without having to push money down the line.

The team's ability to manipulate the cap to comply looks to be top notch.....although given there are few teams that have to do it as often perhaps it's just a perception thing. The fact that I can't recall many teams (if any) who have suffered serious consequences from an inability to comply with the cap doesn't really do much to help his perceived are of "expertise".

On the flip-side, the teams ability to manage the cap in terms of writing contracts that don't become burdensome and avoiding the annual shuffle of cap space looks to be lacking.
Hoofbite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #10
Galian Beast
Senior Member
 
Galian Beast's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
6,761
Default

We definitely have a few issues with the cap.

Miles Austin 7 years 57 million
DeMarcus Ware 7 years 79 million
Marcus Spears 5 years 19 million
Gerald Sensabaugh 6 years 25 million
Orlando Scandrick 6 years 28 million
Jay Ratliff 6 years 58 million
Kyle Orton 3 years 10 million
Nate Livings 5 years 18 million
Doug Free 4 years 42 million
Dan Connor 2 years 6.5 million
Barry Church 5 years 13 million
Mackenzie Bernadeau 4 years 11 million
In the final two months of 2011, Romo’s passer rating was 115.9.
Galian Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013   #11
Randy White
Senior Member
 
Randy White's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,027
Default Seriously

for some of you, itching has become a way of life.

Don't want salary cap problems ? Fine, go back to rooting for the 2000, 2001, and 2002 teams. They didn't have any problems. Of course, they didn't have any talent either, but, hey, they sure weren't making alot.

Here's a question:

Exactly what all that caproom some of you are yearning for, did for the Filthadelphia Beagirls all those years ?
Originally Posted by Chuck 54:

" Everything in the NFL has an element of talent and a dose of good fortune and timing. "
Randy White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013   #12
mmillman
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2006
Posts:
2,053
Default

just shocked that St. Jones the GM and Owner has allowed the team to become so mediocre in most respects. Shocked I say.
mmillman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013   #13
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,183
Default

probably not good but I would not use the bleacher report to wipe a rabid dogs butt
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013   #14
Bluefin
Senior Member
 
Bluefin's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Posts:
2,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post

probably not good but I would not use the bleacher report to wipe a rabid dogs butt
I share your feelings for that site, but they are using John Clayton's numbers in this instance, not anything they came up with on their own.

Clayton saying Dallas is currently $18.2M over the estimated 2013 salary cap ceiling of $120.9M, which would put the team at $139.1M.

Clayton is counting the 2012 cap carry over, which he has at $2.3M, in this number. He makes no mention of the $5M Mara cap penalty, so I don't know if he took it into account.

I have Dallas at $142.053M if Doug Free's contract remains at the original 4 seasons or $141.413M if the team added two additional seasons when they restructured it last off-season.

That's including the $5M Mara penalty and Clayton's $2.3 cap rollover from 2012.

That puts us either $21.153M or $20.513M over the cap.

BLUE STORM RISING
Bluefin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013   #15
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy White View Post
for some of you, itching has become a way of life.

Don't want salary cap problems ? Fine, go back to rooting for the 2000, 2001, and 2002 teams. They didn't have any problems. Of course, they didn't have any talent either, but, hey, they sure weren't making alot.

Here's a question:

Exactly what all that caproom some of you are yearning for, did for the Filthadelphia Beagirls all those years ?
Actually, those teams had a ton of cap trouble. I think at one point they were paying Troy, Michael, and Deion, and none were even on the team.
Future is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com