
|
01-22-2013
|
#46
|
|
Federal Agent
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Fort Hood |
Posts: | 21,743 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
Remember Al Singleton? He was the SLB we got from Tampa Bay in 2003. (Started on that Super Bowl squad) He was 6-2 250 and not exactly a fast cover guy from what I remember.
Greg Spires was their DE (6-1 265) and he only had 3.5 sacks in 2002 for their Super Bowl run.
Warren Sapp only had 7.5 sacks that year.
|
Yeah I see Butler more as a Singleton type then a 4-3 edge rusher.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#47
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 6,764 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
Remember Al Singleton? He was the SLB we got from Tampa Bay in 2003. (Started on that Super Bowl squad) He was 6-2 250 and not exactly a fast cover guy from what I remember.
Greg Spires was their DE (6-1 265) and he only had 3.5 sacks in 2002 for their Super Bowl run.
Warren Sapp only had 7.5 sacks that year.
|
It's not 2003. It's 2013. Tight ends are faster and used more in the passing game. Tell me how big Nick Roach is on the bears... hint 234 lbs.
You can have bigger defensive ends, but the point is the line itself needs to get after the QB. If we don't have a Warren Sapp, you're going to need better defensive ends to get after the QB. FYI, we don't have a Warren Sapp.
In the final two months of 2011, Romo’s passer rating was 115.9.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#48
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 6,764 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rack Bauer
Exactly. In college. He will not be a DE in the NFL. Not a good one. I wouldn't even want him as a "Pass rush specialist" cuz he's not a very good pass rusher.
|
I'd say he is. Look at his sacks per snap, and I'm guessing he is a more efficient pass rusher than Ware.
In the final two months of 2011, Romo’s passer rating was 115.9.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#49
|
|
Federal Agent
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Fort Hood |
Posts: | 21,743 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galian Beast
I'd say he is. Look at his sacks per snap, and I'm guessing he is a more efficient pass rusher than Ware.
|

|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#50
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Posts: | 4,722 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rack Bauer
Butler would NOT be a DE in a 4-3.
|
He would actually be a better fit at WDE in the 4-3-under than an SOLB in Rob Ryan's defense.
Compare Seattle WDE Bruce Irvin to 2012 SOLB Anthony Spencer.
Having said the above, I don't expect Butler to be great at any position. He is not a great run player near the line and he does not have the speed of an off-the-line LB.
You don’t know what you don’t know.
Half of the population has below average intelligence.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#51
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 6,169 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galian Beast
You can have bigger defensive ends, but the point is the line itself needs to get after the QB. If we don't have a Warren Sapp, you're going to need better defensive ends to get after the QB. FYI, we don't have a Warren Sapp.
|
Interesting thing to me is I expect Hatch to do a Spencer and have a career year at 3 tech to get paid. Course we will lose him and probably plug in Crawford at that point, but I don't think we will be hurting at that position.
The grumpy old men crew we have up front for this new 4-3 needs a total overhaul though, but we will have to make them last long enough til we have time to pick up all the replacements.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#52
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Posts: | 4,722 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galian Beast
Dan Connor is entirely too slow to play as a linebacker in a tampa 2 4-3. Entirely too slow.
Linebackers in a tampa 2 need to cover, pursue, and tackle. They aren't going to be in on the blitz much (much, being a keyword).
We absolutely need to get a strong side linebacker, we do not currently have that player on the team. I think it would be interesting to see Barry Church in that position.
|
Dan Connor is too slow in any defense.
You don’t know what you don’t know.
Half of the population has below average intelligence.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#53
|
|
iPhotoshop
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 5,684 |
|
Im willing to bet now Dallas doesnt even have G on its draft board in round 1.
DE will be the pick. I guess you cant really blame them with the talent that will be avail this yr at DE. Disappointing news tho.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#54
|
|
Save the Snow Leopard
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | US |
Posts: | 26,084 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker
Dan Connor is too slow in any defense.
|
Somebody give that man a cigar!
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#55
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2007 |
Location: | Toronto |
Posts: | 1,332 |
|
Tyrone Crawford is your protoypical SDE. If he can stay in that 275-280 range he has enough quickness to play that role very well whilst remaining stout at the POA. Good length as well to bat balls down.
I see him as our starting SDE in september unless we go after say michael bennett or draft ansah
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#56
|
|
iPhotoshop
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 5,684 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by unionjack8
Tyrone Crawford is your protoypical SDE. If he can stay in that 275-280 range he has enough quickness to play that role very well whilst remaining stout at the POA. Good length as well to bat balls down.
I see him as our starting SDE in september unless we go after say michael bennett or draft ansah
|
You can see him as anything you want. But what the Dallas Cowboys are saying is they envision him as a DT.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#57
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 6,169 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinMind
You can see him as anything you want. But what the Dallas Cowboys are saying is they envision him as a DT.
|
Yeah, this is the part that is being ignored in this thread.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#58
|
|
Federal Agent
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Fort Hood |
Posts: | 21,743 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by unionjack8
Tyrone Crawford is your protoypical SDE. If he can stay in that 275-280 range he has enough quickness to play that role very well whilst remaining stout at the POA. Good length as well to bat balls down.
I see him as our starting SDE in september unless we go after say michael bennett or draft ansah
|
Yep. If Red Bryant can play SDE at 320 lbs then Crawford can do it at 290.
I'd love to see him as the SDE in our base defense with Spencer at Sam. NO ONE would run to that side.
THen on passing downs have them both move down a spot (Crawford to DE/SPencer to DE).
Having SPencer at Sam would open things up for us as far as blitzes as well.
And the cowboys have NOT said "Crawford will be a DT". We'll see what Kiffin does with him, but I'd prefer a more Seattle type Tampa 2 to an old Original Tampa 2. But even then, I think Crawford can be every bit the pass rusher Spires was and a helluva lot better fun defender at the same time.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#59
|
|
Federal Agent
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Fort Hood |
Posts: | 21,743 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep_Freeze
Yeah, this is the part that is being ignored in this thread.
|
All I've seen is Jerry say that he could see Crawford at a DT. Not that he WILL be a DT.
|
|
|
01-22-2013
|
#60
|
|
iPhotoshop
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 5,684 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rack Bauer
All I've seen is Jerry say that he could see Crawford at a DT. Not that he WILL be a DT.
|
Them even mentioning it kinda tips their hat on how they see him. Probably a player better suited to provide pressure inside because he cant really provide it outside. And that basically sums up what scouts thought of him coming out of college. Thats why 3-4 teams were looking at him. Stout against the run, but limited.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.
|