Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-22-2013   #1
brooksey1
Senior Member
 
brooksey1's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Location:
NY
Posts:
746
Default Why Callahan as OC/Playcaller is Genius

It really would be a great move for us. The biggest weakness Jason has had as the OC is situational game & time management, no answer to the blitz in big games, problems running the ball and scoring inside the redzone. Some of these problems are personnel problems mainly on the offensive line and some are based on the offensive "Air Coryell" philospohy with these particular players. The Air Coryell vertical attack is not very friendly to Romo with this line...especially against the blitz. They plays take a long time to develop and zone blitzes force Tony in turnovers.

Callahan fixes these problems. First Jason will be able to fully immerse himself in the game management process on both sides of the ball. Callahan will continue to run the Cowboys Air Coryell "number based" system and add some of his WCO plays for Tony. This is important, because we don't have to learn a new offense just add new plays.

Callahan can install WCO plays, assign them a number with Garrett and make the offense more Romo friendly. When we're not in shotgun, more three step drops and get rid of it, the short passes should open up more running lanes and deep balls plus take some pressure of Romo and the "OL". If we can get the running game going we have the play action/boot rollouts for Romo similar to how Rich Gannon was used and how and Aaron Rodgers is used today. It allows them to make more plays with their feet and and can punish the blitz. Both systems are timing based and I think we can thrive with Dez and Romo now on the same page. Romo may need to make some adjustments from reading the deep man first to going through more progressions and dumping it off if nothing is open. I think we can bring that along slowly and he can do it, he's a great student.

Really what we'd be doing is moving from Coryell to a hybrid Coryell/Walsh WCO using the same number system we are using now. At the end of the day Jason will be better, Tony will be better and we can focus the main philisophical difference on the defensive side of the ball.

I love the idea and think this is where we're heading.
brooksey1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-22-2013   #2
17yearsandcounting
Senior Member
 
17yearsandcounting's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2012
Posts:
775
Default

And he has headcoaching experience if we start off slow.

Im not really wild about this, it has an air of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, but I also dont see how it could possibly be worse than the crap we watched in the first half of football games last season.
The Dallas "Football" Cowboys a team where everyone is accountable*.

*Unless their name is Jerry or Jason.
17yearsandcounting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #3
CowboyChris
Senior Member
 
CowboyChris's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Corpus Christi
Posts:
2,630
Send a message via AIM to CowboyChris Send a message via Yahoo to CowboyChris
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooksey1 View Post
It really would be a great move for us. The biggest weakness Jason has had as the OC is situational game & time management, no answer to the blitz in big games, problems running the ball and scoring inside the redzone. Some of these problems are personnel problems mainly on the offensive line and some are based on the offensive "Air Coryell" philospohy with these particular players. The Air Coryell vertical attack is not very friendly to Romo with this line...especially against the blitz. They plays take a long time to develop and zone blitzes force Tony in turnovers.

Callahan fixes these problems. First Jason will be able to fully immerse himself in the game management process on both sides of the ball. Callahan will continue to run the Cowboys Air Coryell "number based" system and add some of his WCO plays for Tony. This is important, because we don't have to learn a new offense just add new plays.
[View Full Quote]
not to be a jerk, but how do you know all this?
CowboyChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #4
EvilJerry88
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Posts:
297
Default

I think it's in Garrett's best interest as a head coach. He won't be overly involved in one side of the ball. Callahan is definitely, experienced. We won't be totally revamping the offense, but Callahan may show better in game management on offense than JG, more creative play calling, etc. Offense shouldn't change so I don't see any kind of huge change but those little costly mistakes at the end of games with clock management and things may be better handled by Callahan which could be the difference between 7-9 and 11-5 or 8-8 and 12-4. We have potential.
EvilJerry88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #5
dupree89
Senior Member
 
dupree89's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Location:
Albany NY
Posts:
218
Default

I love the idea of Garrett not calling plays/in charge of the offense anymore.

I have been negative about Garrett but I am man enough to admit that I think this might make a world of difference in Garrett's success as head coach.

As for whether they appointed the right guy...I will take your word for it as I dont have enough background on his philosophy/tendencies to make my own judgement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super_Kazuya View Post
Jerry is nuttier than a bowl of Grape Nuts.
dupree89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #6
WoodysGirl
Instincts to another flow
 
WoodysGirl's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
58,811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyChris View Post
not to be a jerk, but how do you know all this?
Maybe from this...


Quote:
Jerry said if you assume new playcaller, and you assume Callahan, you can assume elements of his offenses in the past.
http://cowboyszone.com/forums/dallas...s.php?t=251866
Thank you to all donated to the Jason Witten Camp drive!

WoodysGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #7
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

The idea that Garrett will get better at game management by having more time to think about his decisions does not make me optimistic.

He's already lost in the headlights and overthinks things. Now, he'll suddenly improve at this thing he's so horrible at by having more time to make the wrong decision?
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #8
brooksey1
Senior Member
 
brooksey1's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Location:
NY
Posts:
746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyChris View Post
not to be a jerk, but how do you know all this?
I dont. I'm listening to Jerry who has been very vocal about making the offense more romo friendly since our loss to the skins. It is no secret that Romo is suited for a WCO. Callahan is a WCO guy but there is no way we are installing the WCO. The offense is very complex and we don't need to do that while we also flip to a 4-3 on defense. With Callahan and Garrett together, we simply add some WCO "Romo " plays and keep our current number system.

Jerry wants it now and this gives us the best chance to do it, in the shortest amount of time.
brooksey1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #9
Wood
Senior Member
 
Wood's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Location:
West Palm Beach,
Posts:
3,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooksey1 View Post
I dont. I'm listening to Jerry who has been very vocal about making the offense more romo friendly since our loss to the skins. It is no secret that Romo is suited for a WCO. Callahan is a WCO guy but there is no way we are installing the WCO. The offense is very complex and we don't need to do that while we also flip to a 4-3 on defense. With Callahan and Garrett together, we simply add some WCO "Romo " plays and keep our current number system.

Jerry wants it now and this gives us the best chance to do it, in the shortest amount of time.
Jerry has been trying to make the offense more 'romo friendly' for 7 years now. How is that working out? Maybe things shouldn't be so friendly. Just saying.
Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #10
Zman5
Senior Member
 
Zman5's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Haley's Comet
Posts:
3,990
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood View Post
Jerry has been trying to make the offense more 'romo friendly' for 7 years now. How is that working out? Maybe things shouldn't be so friendly. Just saying.
Yeh and who's been the OC/playcaller for most of that 7 years? It's about time we make a change.
Zman5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #11
Erik_H
Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
 
Erik_H's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
In a van down by
Posts:
2,210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooksey1 View Post
It really would be a great move for us. The biggest weakness Jason has had as the OC is situational game & time management, no answer to the blitz in big games, problems running the ball and scoring inside the redzone. Some of these problems are personnel problems mainly on the offensive line and some are based on the offensive "Air Coryell" philospohy with these particular players. The Air Coryell vertical attack is not very friendly to Romo with this line...especially against the blitz. They plays take a long time to develop and zone blitzes force Tony in turnovers.

Callahan fixes these problems. First Jason will be able to fully immerse himself in the game management process on both sides of the ball. Callahan will continue to run the Cowboys Air Coryell "number based" system and add some of his WCO plays for Tony. This is important, because we don't have to learn a new offense just add new plays.

[View Full Quote]
While I may not be as optimistic about this as you, I'd like to thank you for an intelligently thought out post. Nice change of pace from the troll party.
Erik_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #12
Sb or Bust
Why do people that know the least know it the loudest?
 
Sb or Bust's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2009
Posts:
145
Default

Wonder if Callahan will also send in two plays at the same time. Romo yelling kill kill kill and snapping the ball with 1 sec left is something I've grown very fond of the last couple of years. (Sarcasm)
Sb or Bust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #13
Gemini Dolly
Senior Member
 
Gemini Dolly's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2007
Location:
TeXas
Posts:
5,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sb or Bust View Post
Wonder if Callahan will also send in two plays at the same time. Romo yelling kill kill kill and snapping the ball with 1 sec left is something I've grown very fond of the last couple of years. (Sarcasm)
I heard callahan calls in four plays


Gemini Dolly's twitter

QB Tony Romo has played 4 "Win or Go Home" games since 2008 (includes 2 playoff gms) -- in 3 of them, his QBR was less than 20"
---ESPNStatsINFO
Gemini Dolly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #14
Zordon
Senior Member
 
Zordon's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
Austin via Big D
Posts:
4,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilJerry88 View Post
I think it's in Garrett's best interest as a head coach. He won't be overly involved in one side of the ball. Callahan is definitely, experienced. We won't be totally revamping the offense, but Callahan may show better in game management on offense than JG, more creative play calling, etc. Offense shouldn't change so I don't see any kind of huge change but those little costly mistakes at the end of games with clock management and things may be better handled by Callahan which could be the difference between 7-9 and 11-5 or 8-8 and 12-4. We have potential.
whoa that sig hurts.

Zordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013   #15
DBOY3141
Senior Member
 
DBOY3141's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
2,513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zordon View Post
whoa that sig hurts.
I'm guessing SF fans have the same sig since they have had 3 players arrested in the last year and let's not forget Crabtree and his "questioning" about sexual assault prior to a playoff game.
DBOY3141 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com