Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2013   #31
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsay View Post
Regardless of propriety, it would seem that we need to look beyond our two tackles due to age wear and availability considerations (incarceration), for the '13 season. Literally, a big hole to fill.
I don't know what they plan to do with Crawford but if he's going to play inside I would expect more from both Hatcher and Crawford at DT than I would Ratliff next season.

The guy has just broken down physically.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #32
justbob
The Peacemaker
 
justbob's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Two feet over
Posts:
5,806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsay View Post
Regardless of propriety, it would seem that we need to look beyond our two tackles due to age wear and availability considerations (incarceration), for the '13 season. Literally, a big hole to fill.
Do you go with cutting Rat now or keep him another year and hope he stays healthy and sober.


You Young-uns Stay Out of Cbz's Yard --
Still miss you Pops
justbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #33
Zimmy Lives
Senior Member
 
Zimmy Lives's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Location:
Frisco, TX
Posts:
3,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
Whether people like it or not, it comes down to production. Jimmy has said he was consistent in being inconsistent. If a 3rd string QB falls asleep in a meeting, he's gone. If it's Troy Aikman, you wake him up and tell him to pay attention.

Ratliff has not been productive for 3 years. I don't think he qualifies any longer as a guy who should get special treatment for his play on the field.
I agree. Let him go to camp and if he underperforms then cut his ace; salary cap hit be danged. Don't use the DUI thing and make him a martyr.
Garrett to players: Make today a great day; go about the business of winning! If you can't keep up then don't step up.
Zimmy Lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #34
justbob
The Peacemaker
 
justbob's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Two feet over
Posts:
5,806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
I don't know what they plan to do with Crawford but if he's going to play inside I would expect more from both Hatcher and Crawford at DT than I would Ratliff next season.

The guy has just broken down physically.
Answered my question before I asked it RS....So do use this incident as a place to make a point to the team


You Young-uns Stay Out of Cbz's Yard --
Still miss you Pops
justbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #35
LatinMind
iPhotoshop
 
LatinMind's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
5,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
I don't know what they plan to do with Crawford but if he's going to play inside I would expect more from both Hatcher and Crawford at DT than I would Ratliff next season.

The guy has just broken down physically.
Yup, people who say Dallas is weak there arent looking at the roster much. Sure there are no probowlers. But you dont need probowlers in this type of defense that rotates players. Hatcher/Crawford/Lissemore is a start. If you look at the Bears DL its a group of virtual JAGs that get the most out of the system. Melton/Pea/Okoye/Collins. Not the house hold names. IMO Dallas needs a DE more than a DT

Newest Wallpapers Dez|Cowboys Apocalypse
http://latinmind.deviantart.com/#/d5rkvym
Twitter
@CowboysRMX2011

Last edited by LatinMind : 01-25-2013 at 09:29 AM.
LatinMind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #36
Zimmy Lives
Senior Member
 
Zimmy Lives's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Location:
Frisco, TX
Posts:
3,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinMind View Post
When you have a fresh incident just a couple months away it is a despicable act. And can be viewed as detrimental to the team. This just shows that Ratliff isnt putting the team first. Plain and simple.

I guess ill just have to wait until the start of the new football yr to see if he will be cut. I have a feeling he will be. And ill be happy. Its funny how keeping Ratliff is viewed as a positive because theres nobody better at the moment, while its been documented by teammates the guy is a hothead. But a player who was viewed by his teammates as a good teammate was run out of Dallas in Owens. Same kind of situation. Dallas had nobody better. But it was the right choice. As in in this case, they might not have anybody better at the moment, but it would be the best choice to get him out of Dallas. A Cancer is a Cancer
Yes, it was a despicable act but that does not make him a despicable person. Personally, I think the guy is a turd but cutting him now would make him out to be a victim. Let him go to camp and lose his job -- hopefully to some stud rookie the Cowboys draft in the 1st round -- then cut his ace.
Garrett to players: Make today a great day; go about the business of winning! If you can't keep up then don't step up.
Zimmy Lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #37
LatinMind
iPhotoshop
 
LatinMind's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
5,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimmy Lives View Post
Yes, it was a despicable act but that does not make him a despicable person. Personally, I think the guy is a turd but cutting him now would make him out to be a victim. Let him go to camp and lose his job, hopefully to some stud rookie the Cowboys draft in the 1st round. Then cut his ace.
Then there is a little incident where he threatened to whoop a 70 yr olds butt. Remember that? The guy is despicable any way you want to look at it.

Newest Wallpapers Dez|Cowboys Apocalypse
http://latinmind.deviantart.com/#/d5rkvym
Twitter
@CowboysRMX2011
LatinMind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #38
SilverStarCowboy
The Actualist
 
SilverStarCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
6,007
Default

How can you send a message when you are the example.


SilverStarCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #39
Zimmy Lives
Senior Member
 
Zimmy Lives's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Location:
Frisco, TX
Posts:
3,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinMind View Post
Then there is a little incident where he threatened to whoop a 70 yr olds butt. Remember that? The guy is despicable any way you want to look at it.
Maybe but I'm leaning towards mental illness. I think he needs medical help.
Garrett to players: Make today a great day; go about the business of winning! If you can't keep up then don't step up.
Zimmy Lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #40
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justbob View Post
Answered my question before I asked it RS....So do use this incident as a place to make a point to the team
I would cut him. But I would have cut him right after he had his incident with Jerry in the locker room. I wanted to make that point then. As much as I hate Jerry, he's the owner and GM of this team. You show him respect in his own locker room.

I doubt the Cowboys will cut him. I just hope we have a good plan B in place should he miss a lot of time injured again.

Crawford's the wild card. I like him. But where does Kiffin play him? If it's at DT, we're in a little better shape to handle not having Ratliff next year.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #41
Iago33
Senior Member
 
Iago33's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2006
Posts:
1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
Great point, stash.

However, it's the head coach that talks of RKGs and it's the owner that will make the decision to keep or release Ratliff. Don't assume if he stays that that's what the head coach wants.
Exactly. If a message needs to be sent, I'd prefer it to come from the head coach.
Iago33 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #42
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinMind View Post
Yup, people who say Dallas is weak there arent looking at the roster much. Sure there are no probowlers. But you dont need probowlers in this type of defense that rotates players. Hatcher/Crawford/Lissemore is a start. If you look at the Bears DL its a group of virtual JAGs that get the most out of the system. Melton/Pea/Okoye/Collins. Not the house hold names. IMO Dallas needs a DE more than a DT
I don't know if Ratliff would be receptive to it, but if Kiffin intends to play Crawford at DT, I would start him with Hatcher and use Ratliff as a pass rusher in the nickel. Lighten his load and let him do what he does best. Keep him away from all the wear and tear of playing the run.

Now I wouldn't want to be the one who went up to Jay with this plan though. I'd have to have Danny Coale with me in case things got out of hand.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #43
Reality
Administrator
 
Reality's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
10,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinMind View Post
If Jerry wants a moment to change his perception in fans minds or even in nfl circles i think he needs to get rid of Ratliff. What kind of message does it send to his team if he says enough is enough. If he doesnt then that speech meant nothing but sugar coating.

Ratliff is a disgrace, and it just shows the guy is selfish and plain stupid.

Steelers wasted no time in kicking one of their players to the curb for getting arrested. I like that zero tolerance type setting.

If Jerry wanted one moment to take control of the situation and change the whole perception that Dallas is soft this is how you do it. Take the cap hit, show this team that bull will not be tolerated. Cause at the end of the day a team that knows they're being held accountable for their actions will now think twice knowing they would be cut.

[View Full Quote]
It's easy to cut a rookie running back drafted in the 5th round. He has a low round rookie contract and running backs not named Adrian Peterson are the easiest players to replace.

As long as you are comparing us to the Steelers, what about Ben Roethlisberger? What he was accused of was a lot worse yet they stuck by him.

In business, successful people do not make decisions based on emotions. Jimmy would cut a Chris Rainey type of running back too, but there was no way he would have cut Troy, Emmitt, Michael, Leon Lett, Erik Williams, etc.

/reality
Reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #44
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reality View Post
It's easy to cut a rookie running back drafted in the 5th round. He has a low round rookie contract and running backs not named Adrian Peterson are the easiest players to replace.

As long as you are comparing us to the Steelers, what about Ben Roethlisberger? What he was accused of was a lot worse yet they stuck by him.

In business, successful people do not make decisions based on emotions. Jimmy would cut a Chris Rainey type of running back too, but there was no way he would have cut Troy, Emmitt, Michael, Leon Lett, Erik Williams, etc.

/reality
Jimmy's come out and said that many times. He wasn't about to treat Emmitt Smith like he was Derrick Lassic. He'd be a fool to do so.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013   #45
Zordon
Senior Member
 
Zordon's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
Austin via Big D
Posts:
4,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reality View Post
It's easy to cut a rookie running back drafted in the 5th round. He has a low round rookie contract and running backs not named Adrian Peterson are the easiest players to replace.

As long as you are comparing us to the Steelers, what about Ben Roethlisberger? What he was accused of was a lot worse yet they stuck by him.

In business, successful people do not make decisions based on emotions. Jimmy would cut a Chris Rainey type of running back too, but there was no way he would have cut Troy, Emmitt, Michael, Leon Lett, Erik Williams, etc.

/reality


I think most people would agree with this. I think the disagreement is coming from what is ratliff's worth? me personally, i think he's still a valuable piece. i might be singing a different tune if we had 30-40M in cap space.

Zordon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com