Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Sports Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2013   #16
WPBCowboysFan
Senior Member
 
WPBCowboysFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
WPB, FL
Posts:
2,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
Yes. It was the usage of PEDs that allowed for the Yankees to get out of that contract.
This should be part of every contract of every MLB player.
WPBCowboysFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013   #17
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
Yes. It was the usage of PEDs that allowed for the Yankees to get out of that contract.

The Yankees never got out of Giambi's contract. They had an option year on the end of the deal and declined it.

Current MLB policy is that teams may take no action against any player due to drug issues, performance enhancing or otherwise. The league itself is the only entity with that power.
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #18
RastaRocket
Sanka, Ya Dead Mon? Ya Mon.
 
RastaRocket's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
4,214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CashMan View Post
I think that depends on what you classify PED as. Coffee? Energy Drink? HGH?
Banned substances used to enhance performance.


"Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!"

RIP Jerry Brown
RastaRocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #19
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski View Post
The Yankees never got out of Giambi's contract. They had an option year on the end of the deal and declined it.

Current MLB policy is that teams may take no action against any player due to drug issues, performance enhancing or otherwise. The league itself is the only entity with that power.
Auhh. I didn't realize that. Thank you for that info.

I know that contracts are guaranteed in Baseball but I also know that language in contracts, especially more recently, are included in contract language specific to illegal usage of things like PEDs.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #20
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
Auhh. I didn't realize that. Thank you for that info.

I know that contracts are guaranteed in Baseball but I also know that language in contracts, especially more recently, are included in contract language specific to illegal usage of things like PEDs.

I'm not aware of any contract approved by the Commissioner's office that includes anything of the sort.
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #21
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski View Post
I'm not aware of any contract approved by the Commissioner's office that includes anything of the sort.
Heard an interview just this morning over this. Apparently, it's something that is being done more and more because of this very thing.

Typically, teams in this situation have either moved players and eaten portions of their contracts, cut them and simply ate the entire remainder or just cut them and fought the contract after the fact. Usually a settlement situation. Now, I guess, teams are realizing that this whole PEDs thing could easily get out of control and are trying to take measures to safeguard themselves.

I've never seen a player contract so I don't know what they might have looked like before but I thought this was interesting. I also think it's necessary. Teams can not continue to give such lucrative contracts to players who may not be in the league in a years time because of PEDs. MLB, at this point, can not stay in front of the testing curve so your always in a situation where you learn after the fact. Just too much money involved. To many potential long term issues. I imagine the Player's Union will fight it but I don't really think they have a chance on this issue. This is something that I think could kill a Franchise and by extension, the players so I think there will have to be give here.

I long for the days when sports were about playing. I feel bad for those who will never see that side of Pro Sports. It is what it is I suppose.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #22
WPBCowboysFan
Senior Member
 
WPBCowboysFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
WPB, FL
Posts:
2,771
Default

One would think the Yankees are weighing all options with regards to A-Fraud.

If they have any way to get out of that contract you can bet they will attempt to.

It will be interesting to see if anything can be done to get out of the contract or reach some sort of settlement.
WPBCowboysFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #23
WPBCowboysFan
Senior Member
 
WPBCowboysFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
WPB, FL
Posts:
2,771
Default

http://espn.go.com/new-york/mlb/stor...ording-sources

Looks like the Skankees are going to try to get out of the contract.

Can it be done?

My guess is a settlement with A-Roid is their best shot.

Could the team just refuse to pay him and then fight it in court? If there is no provision for an out in the contract they would have to come up with something like PED's used by ARod violate the good faith part of negotiations and the reason for giving the contract in the 1st place. Show evidence of PED's causing long term harm to the body and blame ARod for that. Would that work? Who knows.
WPBCowboysFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #24
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

The Yankees will end up honoring Rodriguez's contract. This has been "explored" numerous times by numerous teams always ending in the same conclusion, they can't be voided.

The only out teams haven't tried is paying the contract then filing suit for fraud. The MLBPA wouldn't stand for that though.
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013   #25
WPBCowboysFan
Senior Member
 
WPBCowboysFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
WPB, FL
Posts:
2,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski View Post
The Yankees will end up honoring Rodriguez's contract. This has been "explored" numerous times by numerous teams always ending in the same conclusion, they can't be voided.

The only out teams haven't tried is paying the contract then filing suit for fraud. The MLBPA wouldn't stand for that though.
If they dont want to honor the contract then they should not pay and fight to keep their money. Once they pay, then going after it would be tough. If they hold out they could hope for an agreed settlement.

My guess is they dont have an out and A-Fraud will get his $$$$ even if he never wears the pinstripes again. They are on the hook for the money so they should just make whatever decision is in the best interest of the club. That money is already spent.
WPBCowboysFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #26
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

Actually, it's being reported that the Yankees are looking at at least 20 different legal options to void the contract, if it's determined by MLB that A-Rod did break the rules.

Chief among these, according to the report, is the contract language that forbids players from using none team sanctioned Medical Treatment from an outside source. This, apparently, would constitute Breach Of Contract.

Who knows what's real and what is not at this point but if MLB finds A-Rod to be guilty of using, the Yankees seem to be serious about voiding his contract.

At worst, they will kill the contract and force A-Rod to fight it in court. This will get expensive and the Yankees may end up paying him in an out of court settlement but even if that happens, that's a win for the Yankees because they would force A-Rod to settle for say .50 cents on the Dollar. Still, a lot of money but not as much as they would have to pay if they just cut him and paid the contract.

The Yankees will not have A-Rod on the team next season. That seems pretty clear at this point.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #27
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
Actually, it's being reported that the Yankees are looking at at least 20 different legal options to void the contract, if it's determined by MLB that A-Rod did break the rules.

Chief among these, according to the report, is the contract language that forbids players from using none team sanctioned Medical Treatment from an outside source. This, apparently, would constitute Breach Of Contract.

Who knows what's real and what is not at this point but if MLB finds A-Rod to be guilty of using, the Yankees seem to be serious about voiding his contract.

[View Full Quote]


They've explored 20 different options because none of them hold any water. A team may pursue a Plan B. When they're down to Plan U, they're pretty much stuck.

If they just stop paying him and sue, they may be on the hook for many times the contract, plus damages, plus fees.

That doesn't even delve into the issues with the league office regarding the luxury tax or MLBPA.

I doubt he suits up for the Yankees in '13 but I would be stunned if they aren't paying him.

I just don't think you grasp the enormity of the situation. This isn't about him, it's about the inner workings of baseball contracts, the strength of the MLBPA...
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #28
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski View Post
They've explored 20 different options because none of them hold any water. A team may pursue a Plan B. When they're down to Plan U, they're pretty much stuck.

If they just stop paying him and sue, they may be on the hook for many times the contract, plus damages, plus fees.

That doesn't even delve into the issues with the league office regarding the luxury tax or MLBPA.

I doubt he suits up for the Yankees in '13 but I would be stunned if they aren't paying him.

I just don't think you grasp the enormity of the situation. This isn't about him, it's about the inner workings of baseball contracts, the strength of the MLBPA...

On the contrary, I grasp it fully. This is a League issue and while I understand that the Player's Union will support players and there are Legal Issues, the game is what's really at stake here. Teams can not afford to give out these huge contracts, only to have players found using. That basically kills the team and the cap. Something has to give. Will it be the money that is payed to the players? Don't think so. Will it be the League accepting PEDs? Don't think so. Will it be the Teams just continuing to lose money on the huge contracts? Don't think so.

I understand fully whats involved here. I also understand that the numbers don't work. Something has to change and it will be the contracts and what players can be held to at the end of the day. There is no support for the Unions or the Players on this position. This is what I believe will eventually happen.

What's more, if you don't fix this (Union and Players), your going to leave yourself open to Government Intervention and nobody wants that. That's a lose/lose all the way around.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #29
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post

I long for the days when sports were about playing. I feel bad for those who will never see that side of Pro Sports. It is what it is I suppose.
When was that exactly?
joseephuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #30
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WPBCowboysFan View Post
One would think the Yankees are weighing all options with regards to A-Fraud.

If they have any way to get out of that contract you can bet they will attempt to.

It will be interesting to see if anything can be done to get out of the contract or reach some sort of settlement.
This is what I think will happen. I think the Yankees will fight it legally until they force A-Rod to either request a trade or retire. I mean, if they can tie it up for two years, lets say, that's a long time in the playing life of A-Rod. If he does want to play, he's going to have consider settling. The longer the Yankees keep him on the shelf, the closer A-Rod gets to retiring. Either way, A-Rod loses money so I do see this as a viable method for the Yankees to force a settlement.

JMO of course.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com