Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-31-2013   #1
JDSTAR
Senior Member
 
JDSTAR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Posts:
126
Default Hypothetical

Lets say we find lots of depth for both the Oline and Dline from the combine and pro days. Would you take Cordarelle Patterson if he fell to 18? He is a true talent at the WR position and he would make our receiving corp look elite.
JDSTAR is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2013   #2
robert70x7
Senior Member
 
robert70x7's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Posts:
998
Default

Jerrah? Is that you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13 View Post
It wouldn't have to be a first-round pick, and we will have free-agent money.
robert70x7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #3
JDSTAR
Senior Member
 
JDSTAR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Posts:
126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robert70x7 View Post
Jerrah? Is that you?
Maybe
JDSTAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #4
Boys122
Senior Member
 
Boys122's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2010
Posts:
1,239
Default

It wouldn't surprise me at all if he took a wr.
Boys122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #5
DBOY3141
Senior Member
 
DBOY3141's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
2,530
Default

No. I would trade back with the Vikings, so they could take him. We need top qualify OL and DL, not more receivers.

Stop drafting 4th - 7th round players and hope they develop.

There is a reason SF has a good line, they have 3 1st rounders playing the OL.
DBOY3141 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #6
JDSTAR
Senior Member
 
JDSTAR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Posts:
126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOY3141 View Post
No. I would trade back with the Vikings, so they could take him. We need top qualify OL and DL, not more receivers.

Stop drafting 4th - 7th round players and hope they develop.

There is a reason SF has a good line, they have 3 1st rounders playing the OL.
Yea, but they also have 3 first round recievers (Crabtree, Jenkins, Moss) and a first round TE. I know you can make the argument that two of those players have been obsolete this season.
JDSTAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #7
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,732
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDSTAR View Post
Lets say we find lots of depth for both the Oline and Dline from the combine and pro days. Would you take Cordarelle Patterson if he fell to 18? He is a true talent at the WR position and he would make our receiving corp look elite.
I said in another post that in 3 years when we look back at the 2013 draft, Cordarrelle Patterson might be the best player drafted.

I would only consider it if Warmack and Cooper are gone. Those are the only 2 must-have players for me that could be at #18.

I put a higher value on OLinemen over DLinemen because of the percentage of snaps played. The DLinemen are normally in a rotation; whereas, the OLinemen normally play 100% of the offensive snaps.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #8
GloryDaysRBack
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,098
Default

Jenkins doesn't count. He doesn't do anything
GloryDaysRBack is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #9
chuch
Member
 
chuch's Avatar
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
I said in another post that in 3 years when we look back at the 2013 draft, Cordarrelle Patterson might be the best player drafted.

I would only consider it if Warmack and Cooper are gone. Those are the only 2 must-have players for me that could be at #18.

I put a higher value on OLinemen over DLinemen because of the percentage of snaps played. The DLinemen are normally in a rotation; whereas, the OLinemen normally play 100% of the offensive snaps.
I've always wondered whether front offices takes this into account when determining positional value. Seems like keeping more skilled players on the field for longer periods of time should be obvious.
chuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #10
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDSTAR View Post
Lets say we find lots of depth for both the Oline and Dline from the combine and pro days. Would you take Cordarelle Patterson if he fell to 18? He is a true talent at the WR position and he would make our receiving corp look elite.
I'll be kind here.

NO

The kid is talented though, I'll give him that.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #11
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,841
Default

Wouldn't hate it. Doing so would mean releasing Miles, and hopefully landing a G or T in FA or via trade.

However, I think if he falls, a trade back with someone who really covets him makes a lot of sense.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #12
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,362
Default

They should take the highest rated player on the board, the scouts have actually been good at spotting talent. If somebody offers them a deal that blows em away, they should take the deal. In general though, I believe this team needs more bodies, not less.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #13
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,597
Default

Only if he was the best player on our board and I couldn't trade out.
ABQCOWBOY is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #14
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,732
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Future View Post
Wouldn't hate it. Doing so would mean releasing Miles, and hopefully landing a G or T in FA or via trade.

However, I think if he falls, a trade back with someone who really covets him makes a lot of sense.
Good point about Austin. They could put the 6M in salary cap savings into a Lineman; therefore, partially offsetting the fact that they didn't take one with #18.

The problem is that they would need to sign the Free Agent Lineman before the draft.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #15
DBOY3141
Senior Member
 
DBOY3141's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
2,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDSTAR View Post
Yea, but they also have 3 first round recievers (Crabtree, Jenkins, Moss) and a first round TE. I know you can make the argument that two of those players have been obsolete this season.
They didnt' draft Moss, so you can't count him.

They drafted Jenkins the year after they went to an NFC Championship game and the OL was established. When we get our OL established, I will be all for using another 1st rounder on a skill position.

Until then, no WR/TE/RB in the first 2 rounds. They are all a dime a dozen.
DBOY3141 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com