Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-31-2013   #16
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

People said that Cordy Glenn had to move inside in the pros too.

But what little I saw of him, he looked pretty good out at tackle.
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #17
da_whiz_kid
Senior Member
 
da_whiz_kid's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
They moved James Carpenter to OG.

Keep in mind that Callahan is known for his Zone Blocking Scheme.

I have reviewed all of the Cowboys games on the All-22. Many of their Zone Stretch Runs that failed were due to 1 player being 1 step late to their block.

I can't blame all of those failures on a lack of quickness because there were some failed blocks where the OL stayed on his initial help-block too long; although in theory the quicker the player the longer he can stay with the help block and still get to his required 2nd block.

I'm not advocating for or against the ZBS, just pointing out that quickness is critical if you're planning to use it.

It's funny actually reading up on the type of offense we ran and the ZBS. In the ZBS as you mentioned, quickness is key to getting to the block. In the Coryell(this was hilarious) the requirements for it to work efficiently were, a good line, one that could create a pocket and type for the QB to step in and hit his WR that were deep, and a power run game. It was about timing and rhythm and the wr had to be in their spots. So if the ZBS is not working because the players were not quick enough to run it, and your passing game is lacking to very key details to running the offense correctly(power run, great protection up front), couple that with lack of adjustments, I don't see how we even won 8 games considering how inefficiently the offense was being run as a whole.
If you build it, he will run...
da_whiz_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #18
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

I like Long. He's got short arms but I like everything else about him.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #19
Tezz
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
248
Default

He might go 1st-early 2nd because I think he would have a smooth transition to Guard if he fails at RT.
Tezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #20
The Realist
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,264
Default

I like, not love him.

I prefer Chris Faulk and he fits the bill of us drafting injured players that fall.
The Realist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #21
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
I like Long. He's got short arms but I like everything else about him.
He seems like an LT to me.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013   #22
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

I like Fluker alot. He may not look the smoothest or fastest out there but he's a football player.

Kinda developing into a pet cat, I think
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #23
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
He seems like an LT to me.

I think his arms are too short for LT but if he could be a LT, that's not a bad problem to have. We could move Smith back to RT, where he played much, much better anyway. Either way, I think we could probably draft Long a little later and get very good value there.

Last edited by ABQCOWBOY : 02-04-2013 at 09:48 AM.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #24
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,352
Default

Can we all agree that Fluker, Faulk and even Long are likely upgrades over what is being trotted out there now. Only question is value, where do you get em.
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #25
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
Can we all agree that Fluker, Faulk and even Long are likely upgrades over what is being trotted out there now. Only question is value, where do you get em.
Yes, I think that's a fair thing to say.
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #26
CowboysLaw87
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Posts:
164
Default

Fluker is a less athletic, more assertive Cordy Glenn. And for the record, I'll take that trade off. I really liked Cordy last year because of his position flexibility. I figured at worst, here's a guy that'll be a darn good OG that could bump out to either OT spot in a pinch (or to RT full time if Free struggled).

Fluker doesn't have a high ceiling as a pass protector at OT, but his 37" arms certainly help. With some minor technique tweaks, I think he'd be adequate there. And he could be the game's best run blocking RT. An A+ run blocker and a B- pass protector (where Romo can see the rush anyway). Yes please.

But initially I'd play him at OG, where his run blocking is highlighted and his pass pro concerns diminished. He'd be a Day 1 starter at OG, and a really good one at that. He allows us to release Free, start Parnell, and bump out there if need be.

Smith-Fluker-Costa-Livings/Berny-Parnell

That's a much better OL (particularly run blocking) than in 2012. And it could only cost a 2nd rounder.
CowboysLaw87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #27
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboysLaw87 View Post

Fluker doesn't have a high ceiling as a pass protector at OT, but his 37" arms certainly help. With some minor technique tweaks, I think he'd be adequate there. And he could be the game's best run blocking RT. An A+ run blocker and a B- pass protector (where Romo can see the rush anyway). Yes please.

That's a much better OL (particularly run blocking) than in 2012. And it could only cost a 2nd rounder.
Nut shell at worst pass blocking stays same and run blocking takes huge step forward. I totally agree.
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #28
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

We could really use a massive run blocking tackle or guard on this team. Fluker is ideal. I really liked Glenn last year, but I like Fluker better--because of his strength and assertiveness (as mentioned above)
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #29
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede View Post
People said that Cordy Glenn had to move inside in the pros too.

But what little I saw of him, he looked pretty good out at tackle.
Cordy Glenn
6056, 345, 5.15 forty

I don't expect Fluker to break 5.5 in the forty.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #30
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
Cordy Glenn
6056, 345, 5.15 forty

I don't expect Fluker to break 5.5 in the forty.
then we shouldn't ask him to block anyone 40 yards down field??

that's a very weak complaint imho.

in the SEC he proved plenty able to block down field for multiple seasons.
he was a day 1 starter on a great collegiate ol.

dont think nate newton had any speed. many other guys along our ol either. we need guys who can actually block, we have guys who can run pass people and whiff or get driven back into the QB now.

i hope he runs a slow 40 and falls to us in r2 because he projected much higher right now.

anyone who watched the games saw a guy destroy people play after play.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com