
|
02-10-2013
|
#16
|
|
I'm kind of a Big Deal
Joined: | Dec 2007 |
Location: | Under The Bus |
Posts: | 6,020 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offsides
I think the Cowboys number 1 priority is to upgrade the OL and DL lines but I also think their receiver situation after Bryant is not too solid. Austin is alway hurt. Not that the Vikings would have interest in Austin, but I'd try to trade Austin and a draft pick for Harvin.
|
so you would trade Austin and a pick for a guy who misses more time than him and puts up fewer yards and TDs?.....cant argue that logic
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#17
|
|
Surrealist
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 43,249 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theebs
Trading Austin and a pick for harvin?
That is crazy talk.
|
Harvin is 24 years old. Seriously.
If you could get him for Austin and 3rd, you take that trade. This team needs a serious deep threat.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#18
|
|
Surrealist
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 43,249 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17
I think Harvin is a top 5 receiver when healthy but he would be a bad fit here with Garrett calling plays.
|
If we got Harvin, he'd be here a heckuva lot longer than Garrett will.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#19
|
|
Benched
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
Well then they're missing out. Ask the Seahawks and Lions.
|

|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#20
|
|
Believe!!!!
Joined: | Feb 2006 |
Location: | Cookies? |
Posts: | 20,488 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt
Harvin is 24 years old. Seriously.
If you could get him for Austin and 3rd, you take that trade. This team needs a serious deep threat.
|
I wouldn't.
Austin is way better than people think.
Perfect chemistry in the locker room and with romo.
I will take Austin over harvin.
Probably in the minority but I am happy to be in this case.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 18,268 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theebs
I wouldn't.
Austin is way better than people think.
Perfect chemistry in the locker room and with romo.
I will take Austin over harvin.
Probably in the minority but I am happy to be in this case.
|
The stats support you.
****
"The restructures are built in. Everybody’s making a big to do about this. I don’t know why."- Stephen Jones
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 29,066 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt
Harvin is 24 years old. Seriously.
If you could get him for Austin and 3rd, you take that trade. This team needs a serious deep threat.
|
He's a monster on KRs too which is something this team hasn't had in just about forever.
I'm not positive but I think you have to go back to when Harvin was in grade school in order for Dallas to have accumulated as many KR TDs as he has in the past 4 years.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#23
|
|
We got a hat. I want a ring.
Joined: | Jan 2008 |
Location: | Duncan, Oklahoma |
Posts: | 21,130 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt
Harvin is 24 years old. Seriously.
If you could get him for Austin and 3rd, you take that trade. This team needs a serious deep threat.
|
I'd have to agree.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2012 |
Location: | The Mid Altantic |
Posts: | 2,125 |
|
Mannnn this is a tough one... I like Harvin's versatility though.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2010 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 151 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
Harvin
2012 Minnesota Vikings 9 8 62 677 10.9 45 3
2011 Minnesota Vikings 16 14 87 967 11.1 52T 6
2010 Minnesota Vikings 14 13 71 868 12.2 53T 5
2009 Minnesota Vikings 15 8 60 790 13.2 51T 6
Austin
2012 Dallas Cowboys 16 15 66 943 14.3 49 6
2011 Dallas Cowboys 10 10 43 579 13.5 53T 7
2010 Dallas Cowboys 16 16 69 1,041 15.1 69T 7
2009 Dallas Cowboys 16 9 81 1,320 16.3 60T 11
2008 Dallas Cowboys 12 0 13 278 21.4 63 3
2007 Dallas Cowboys 16 0 5 76 15.2 35 0
2006 Dallas Cowboys 9 0 -- -- -- -- --
|
look who their respective qbs are, Austin is a decent wr2 but he's nowhere near the talent of Harvin
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 29,066 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tantrix1969
look who their respective qbs are, Austin is a decent wr2 but he's nowhere near the talent of Harvin
|
Are trying to say that Christian Ponder, Joe Webb, Donovan McNabb are no Tony Romo?
Granted he had Favre but that was after Favre's miracle season and the Favre he got was the busted down QB who was just as bad as the guys above.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2011 |
Posts: | 2,085 |
|
Why would they take Austin for harvin? Austin contract is awful

Austin 3:16
Says The Cowboys Will Whip Your ***
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#28
|
|
Surrealist
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 43,249 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theebs
I wouldn't.
Austin is way better than people think.
Perfect chemistry in the locker room and with romo.
I will take Austin over harvin.
Probably in the minority but I am happy to be in this case.
|
Austin will be 29 years old this season and his best production is behind him. Harvin will double or triple Austin's production in the next 6 years.
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 18,268 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowdown27
Why would they take Austin for harvin? Austin contract is awful
|
No it isn't the actual contract paid a large chunk during the uncapped year. Now the fines the nfl gave them would make it not as good but they don't count together.
****
"The restructures are built in. Everybody’s making a big to do about this. I don’t know why."- Stephen Jones
|
|
|
02-10-2013
|
#30
|
|
Surrealist
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 43,249 |
|
Austin has non-guaranteed base salaries of:
2013: $6.732 million
2014: $5.5 million
2015: $6.888 million
2016: $11.38 million
If there was a trade, they would re-work the contract contemporaneously.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.
|