Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-20-2013   #31
Clove
Shrinkage
 
Clove's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
34,626
Default

bottom line, there was no pressure on the quarterback. roll out any scheme you want, if you can't get to the quarterback , it's useless.

Clove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013   #32
Vinnie2u
Senior Member
 
Vinnie2u's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Chesapeake, VA
Posts:
1,665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clove View Post
bottom line, there was no pressure on the quarterback. roll out any scheme you want, if you can't get to the quarterback , it's useless.
Watching a one legged RG3 Standing back there with a clean uniform was a back breaker..
Vinnie2u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013   #33
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clove View Post
bottom line, there was no pressure on the quarterback. roll out any scheme you want, if you can't get to the quarterback , it's useless.
That's what it is right there. This simplified scheme to account for the rare year where you have a ton of injuries on one side of the ball doesn't fly.

You'll never convince me the 4-3 is a better scheme. Last I checked the Super Bowl was played with two 3-4 defenses. They must have missed the memo on this keep it simple, go 4-3 idea.

The GM talked of being uncomfortable this offseason. Like every offseason. He's not about to change himself. His son is going nowhere. He's not ready yet to can the head coach, he's too comfortable with him. So Rob, you're up. You're the problem this year. We'll even make another cosmetic change of play caller on offense.

Wake me up when there's real change and our problems are actually being addressed.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013   #34
Wolfpack
Senior Member
 
Wolfpack's Avatar
Years Donated
2008
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Beaufort, SC
Posts:
2,238
Default

How do most team manage the Next Man Up thing and not here?

The pattern might be that the TC guys get cut to keep the development long shots. Thus you have no real depth and have to bring in a Street guy to actually play while the depth guys ride the pine cause they are pet cats? Its like the whole keeping 3 kickers awhile ago. Just silly.

How does Erin Simms roll in and none of the guys on the squad from TC can? Why not bring Erin in during TC if he was the guy? Why have Dan Conner on the team if he cant start?
Wolfpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013   #35
T-RO
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2009
Posts:
3,669
Default

We are going backwards. Our defense might have been top ten next year. Not now.

Absolutely horrific decision-making once again at Valley Ranch.

Too many schemes? No, too few healthy bodies.
--------------
Jerry Jones' accountabilibuddy
T-RO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013   #36
Little Jr
Senior Member
 
Little Jr's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Deer Park TX
Posts:
2,114
Default

I have no problem with firing rob. I agree his schemes was questionable at times. I just don't get where the accountability on the offense side of the ball?
Little Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #37
JerryFan
Senior Member
 
JerryFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
1,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomsday101 View Post
Yet has won a SB. I tend to agree with a statement Kiffin made, 3-4/4-3 there are 11 guys on defense and the key is getting them to play as a 1. Play hard, smart and fast.

I like Rob but my biggest complaint was how often he would use 3 man rushes. You get a team in a sure passing situation and we turn around and rush 3? Other teams will put you in a passing situation and then get after the QB we didn't we sat back and allowed QB's all day to find the open man.
I agree 100%. It would drive me nuts and then wonder why our DB'S didn't have a lot of INT's. He'd give the qb a perfect comfy pocket to throw on damn near anything longer then 3rd and 10.
JerryFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #38
Joe Rod
Do you like movies about Gladiators?
 
Joe Rod's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Somewhere Awesom
Posts:
7,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodysGirl View Post
More than a month after the organization tossed Ryan to the curb and brought Kiffin into the fold, Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones said the change that was made was a “tough decision.”

But he also added it was made with long-term considerations in mind.

“I think Rob is a very smart guy,” Jones said. “His schemes are very sound. There are a lot of schemes. That becomes a question. We made a tough decision. We felt like too many schemes can cause problems regardless of how good they are and how sound they are. If there is more than the players can digest in this day and time – as you don’t keep players for long, they move on and you have injuries – you just had to make a decision. And we made a tough one.”

Jones’ comment came after he was asked if the simplicity of Kiffin’s 4-3 scheme was an attractive selling point when they contemplated hiring him.

[View Full Quote]

If they truly feel that way, then why didn't they feel that way after watching Wade Phillips have to "simplify" the defense virtually every year when he was here in-season? Free Agency and injuries have been commonplace for decades, was it magically supposed to change because they brought in Rob Ryan and more complex schemes?

The beauty of the 3-4 is the confusion it can bring to offenses, yet Rob Ryan is at fault for making the defense have different schemes like other successful 3-4 defenses. Seems like they just wasted a few years.
Joe Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #39
Yakuza Rich
Senior Member
 
Yakuza Rich's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Orlando, FL
Posts:
10,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Rod View Post
If they truly feel that way, then why didn't they feel that way after watching Wade Phillips have to "simplify" the defense virtually every year when he was here in-season? Free Agency and injuries have been commonplace for decades, was it magically supposed to change because they brought in Rob Ryan and more complex schemes?

The beauty of the 3-4 is the confusion it can bring to offenses, yet Rob Ryan is at fault for making the defense have different schemes like other successful 3-4 defenses. Seems like they just wasted a few years.
To Jerry's credit, the CBA was renewed after Rob had been hired.

The new CBA rules really limit practice time. As Garrett mentioned in the press conference, they essentially felt with less practice time and hitting allowed, it has created more injuries and thus you need players who can step right in and it's too difficult, from their perspective, to do in a complex scheme.

I believe there was much more to getting rid of Ryan than just too many and too complex schemes. But, since day 1 Garrett has put a major focus on players being able to come right into the game and play. It's even been mentioned that he doesn't refer to anybody as a 'backup.' So I can believe their concerns about injuries and how to best combat them. Whether it works or not is another question.






YR
The integrity of the Dallas Sports Media can be summed up in this quote 'I've gotta be the bad guy on CBS11 and my radio job on ESPN. I don't have to be the bad guy here.' - Steve Dennis

Legend of Kirby Dar Dar Blog
Yakuza Rich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #40
Double Trouble
Senior Member
 
Double Trouble's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,081
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodysGirl View Post
“I think Rob is a very smart guy,” Jones said. “His schemes are very sound. There are a lot of schemes. That becomes a question. We made a tough decision. We felt like too many schemes can cause problems regardless of how good they are and how sound they are. If there is more than the players can digest in this day and time – as you don’t keep players for long, they move on and you have injuries – you just had to make a decision. And we made a tough one.”
Stephen Jones has such vast and deep experience with NFL defenses, it's clear that he's more than qualified to make such a call.

We're fortunate to have him to go to war against people like Mike Shanahan and Jerry Reese.
“He doesn’t like it because Jerry thinks he’s the walk-around head coach." - Jimmy Johnson
Double Trouble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #41
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Trouble View Post
Stephen Jones has such vast and deep experience with NFL defenses, it's clear that he's more than qualified to make such a call.

We're fortunate to have him to go to war against people like Mike Shanahan and Jerry Reese.
Sadly, that's the hand we've been dealt.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #42
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,427
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Trouble View Post
Stephen Jones has such vast and deep experience with NFL defenses, it's clear that he's more than qualified to make such a call.
You think it was SJ's call?
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #43
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,346
Default

Makes no difference as to the why Rob was fired. Seldom in the NFL are HC or organizations going to rip a guy after they fire him. They will compliment them and talk about a new direction or something of that nature. People getting worked up over the reason why must not follow the NFL closely.

I don't blame Ryan for the season but I can't say I was impressed by him either. I expected a much more aggressive defense and that is not what he delivered.
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #44
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit View Post
You think it was SJ's call?


As cynical as I can be at times, I don't see this being SJ's call.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #45
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakuza Rich View Post
I believe there was much more to getting rid of Ryan than just too many and too complex schemes.
Way more than we know and will ever be made public.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com