Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone
Reload this Page Cooper/Warmack

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3456 > Last »
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2013   #16
RamziD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,486
Default
So, are they weighing-in/measuring the OL today? If so, are we going to get updates or one of those fancy spreadsheets from xwalker and the likes? Those are always great resources and much appreciated by everyone.
RamziD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #17
Boys122
Senior Member
 
Boys122's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2010
Posts:
1,239
Default
I'd be happy with either one but Cooper can play guard or center. Maybe we look for that guard that can play center to or that tackle that can play guard.

At least you have more options in that scenario.For example: Fluker, Cooper, Thomas, Jones, Frederick.
Boys122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #18
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boys122 View Post
I'd be happy with either one but Cooper can play guard or center. Maybe we look for that guard that can play center to or that tackle that can play guard.

At least you have more options in that scenario.For example: Fluker, Cooper, Thomas, Jones, Frederick.
Great point. The team definitely values flexibility in their OL
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #19
Boys122
Senior Member
 
Boys122's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2010
Posts:
1,239
Default
Jones and Frederick in the second or third round though.
Boys122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #20
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default
Brian Winters. He's probably the most flexible of all the OL prospects.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #21
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default
If we don't come away with Cooper, Warmack, Warford or Fluker in the first--and yes, I think Warford sneaks in round 1 like Zeitler last year--then I'd want Thomas or Frederick in round 2.
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #22
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,695
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rack Bauer View Post
Cooper: 6'2", 311 lbs. 34" reach

Warmack 6'2", 317 lbs. 34 7/8" reach.

First... Anyone still worried about cooper's size?

Second... That's pretty good reach for guards. We need to get one of these guys.
I've been anxiously awaiting the info on these 2 players. That is exactly where I thought that Cooper would weigh in. I'm surprised that Warmack came in under his college listed weight of 322.

The excellent arm length is just a bonus on top of the already known ability of these two players.

I'm curious to see how these two do in the speed/quickness measurables.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #23
Rack Bauer
Federal Agent
 
Rack Bauer's Avatar
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Fort Hood
Posts:
21,740
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
I've been anxiously awaiting the info on these 2 players. That is exactly where I thought that Cooper would weigh in. I'm surprised that Warmack came in under his college listed weight of 322.

The excellent arm length is just a bonus on top of the already known ability of these two players.

I'm curious to see how these two do in the speed/quickness measurables.
Agreed. And I normally don't give two rat's behinds about the underwear Olympics but I do like to see how the OL does on the agility and the 10 meter "dash".

Other than that, what they do during this time has nothing to do with what type of football player they are, their game tape shows what type of player they are.

But for two players at the same position we're looking at, I like to see how they compare on the shuttle, 3 cone drill and the 10 yards.
Rack Bauer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #24
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,353
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddyuta View Post
I would love to take one of these guys but its going to be defense again with the first pick.
This. Both are safe picks but too many holes on defense.
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #25
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,353
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede View Post
If we don't come away with Cooper, Warmack, Warford or Fluker in the first--and yes, I think Warford sneaks in round 1 like Zeitler last year--then I'd want Thomas or Frederick in round 2.
Read Fluker down to 339.
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #26
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,180
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
This. Both are safe picks but too many holes on defense.
every time I hear that- and its every year I hear that- I wonder how so many can be so blind
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #27
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,353
Default
Eric Edholm ‏@Eric_Edholm
Wisconsin OL Travis Frederick, ready to chop down a few trees. pic.twitter.com/wxONjCXfyT
View photo Reply Retweet Favorite More
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #28
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
Read Fluker down to 339.

That's really good for him. If he can get to say 335 and show some agility, he's a 1st round lock and a guy I would go get! I love the way he plays. I just hate that he is so slow out of his stance in pass protection.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #29
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,353
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
every time I hear that- and its every year I hear that- I wonder how so many can be so blind
Fact: Kiffins defense wont work with current personnel. Huge holes on the D Line and Safety and one LB.
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #30
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,695
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
Read Fluker down to 339.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
That's really good for him. If he can get to say 335 and show some agility, he's a 1st round lock and a guy I would go get! I love the way he plays. I just hate that he is so slow out of his stance in pass protection.
He really needed to come in lower than 339, IMO. At under 6-5, 339 is really heavy for an OT.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply
Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3456 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Home - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com